Development of a treatment technique for the AeroForm™ tissue expander breast implant system–a single department experience

Purpose Air tissue expander systems offer breast cancer patients a number of advantages but present an unusual challenge when treating patients post mastectomy with external beam radiation therapy The primary aim of this study was to describe the planning protocol developed for external beam locoregional radiation therapy RT in post mastectomy patients with in situ air expanders and to quantify the effect of the AeroForm trade AirXpanders reg Palo Alto California implant on target volumes and treatment factors Secondary aims included an evaluation of clinical outcomes including acute side effects Methods and materials This is a single institution review of eight female patients treated between March and August All patients received a prescription of cGy in treatments delivered five times per week Specific density overrides were applied to critical structures in order to achieve the most accurate dose distribution Acute side effects were assessed at weeks two four and six during radiation therapy and followed up at week six after the final treatment Results A three dimensional D conformal radiation therapy CRT tangential wedged pair technique with additional contouring and density overrides applied to critical structures is suitable for patients with breast air tissue expanders mm ndash mm of bolus over the entire chest wall throughout treatment enhances treatment delivery accuracy to the superficial skin layers without increasing early acute skin reactions Conclusion It is feasible to plan radiation therapy in patients with air tissue expanders requiring chest wall with or without nodes irradiation using an appropriate planning technique and density overrides to critical structures The addition of bolus to the entire chest wall increases dose distribution accuracy Early clinical results show that this treatment method is reproducible has acceptable early toxicity and results in similar acute toxicity to those seen in patients without air expanders Our air expander protocol will continue to be adapted as additional prospective data is collected

[1]  J. Bradley,et al.  To Treat or Not to Treat? A Postmastectomy Question. , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Xiaohong Xu,et al.  Meta-analysis for psychological impact of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer , 2018, Breast Cancer.

[3]  R. Jagsi,et al.  Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction , 2018, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  A. Hasenburg,et al.  Psychosocial Aspects of Immediate versus Delayed Breast Reconstruction , 2017, Breast Care.

[5]  B. Mehrara,et al.  Radiotherapy in the setting of breast reconstruction: types, techniques, and timing. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  J. Ascherman,et al.  Carbon Dioxide–Based versus Saline Tissue Expansion for Breast Reconstruction: Results of the XPAND Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial , 2016, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  T. Fitzgerald,et al.  Dosimetric impact of the AeroForm tissue expander in postmastectomy radiation therapy: an ex vivo analysis. , 2015, Practical radiation oncology.

[8]  H. Verkooijen,et al.  Prospective evaluation of severe skin toxicity and pain during postmastectomy radiation therapy. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M. Chao,et al.  A dosimetric analysis of the Aeroform(tm) tissue expander in radiation therapy , 2014 .

[10]  EBCTCG (Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborati Effect of radiotherapy after mastectomy and axillary surgery on 10-year recurrence and 20-year breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 8135 women in 22 randomised trials , 2014, The Lancet.

[11]  J. Rembert,et al.  Radiation testing of the AeroForm co2-based breast tissue expander implant , 2013, Radiation Oncology.

[12]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Breast patient setup error assessment: comparison of electronic portal image devices and cone-beam computed tomography matching results. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Julie C. Lowery,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Long-term Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: Two-year Postoperative Results From the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[14]  L Fallowfield,et al.  Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. , 2000, European journal of cancer.

[15]  P. Cederna,et al.  Prospective Analysis of Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: One-Year Postoperative Results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[16]  P. Ganz,et al.  Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.