Multinational Intellect: The Synergistic Power of Cross Cultural Knowledge Networks

The world of international business is experiencing transformations of such magnitude that existing business models have become either invalid of incomplete. A fundamental force behind these disruptions has been the emergence of the digital networked economy (Ridderstrale and Nordstrom 2004, Flores and Spinosa, 1998) with its supporting internet and communications technology. One significant manifestation of this economy is the emergence of business models designed to gain competitive advantage by bonding with customers, suppliers and complementors (Wilde and Hax 2001). From the multinational perspective outsourcing and off shoring have been the most common examples of this approach, but user lead innovation models (von Hippel 2005) based on Open Source methods are rapidly emerging as the leading source of competitive advantage. Commitment has been argued to play an important role in determining the success of these relationships (Abrahamsson and Livari, 2002) suggesting that entrepreneurs must be adept at building and maintaining commitment based value networks (Allee 2004, Sveiby and Roland 2002, Savage 1996, Gadman 1996, Adams 2004). This paper considers the challenges associated with commitment in multinational value networking and finds them to be most problematic in the diffusion of innovation where increasing levels of commitment are required across national boundaries and cultures. (Mauer, Rai and Sali 2004). Current research into core commitment structures of virtual multinational communities is not been well established. By analyzing data from a range of sources the paper concludes that the success of value networks depends on the desire of participants to acquire history making identities (Gauntlett 2002, Spinosa et al. 1997) by maintaining identity defining commitments across the network. Implications for theory and research are discussed. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-60566-679-2.ch003

[1]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover , 2013 .

[2]  Chong Ju Choi,et al.  China's Social Market Economy: The Leverage of Economic Growth , 2013, Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag..

[3]  Ashis K. Pani,et al.  E-procurement in Emerging Economies: Theory and Cases , 2007 .

[4]  K. Vaidya Organizational Assimilation of E-Procurement: An Institutional Perspective and the Research Model , 2007 .

[5]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Finding Cures for Tropical Diseases: Is Open Source an Answer? , 2004, PLoS medicine.

[6]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Karl-Erik Sveiby,et al.  Collaborative climate and effectiveness of knowledge work - an empirical study , 2002, J. Knowl. Manag..

[8]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  Commitment in software process improvement - in search of the process , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  David Gauntlett Media, Gender and Identity: An Introduction , 2002 .

[10]  Pekka Abrahamsson,et al.  Rethinking the Concept of Commitment in Software Process Improvement , 2001, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  The Delta Project , 2001 .

[12]  Eric Lease Morgan,et al.  Review of The Cathedral & the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary by Eric S. Raymond, Sebastopol, Calif.: O'Reilly, 1999 , 2000 .

[13]  Gary Mongiovi Shackle on Equilibrium: A Critique , 2000 .

[14]  Fernando Flores,et al.  Information technology and the institution of identity: Reflections since Understanding Computers and Cognition , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[15]  Ming Zeng,et al.  The Infeasibility of Invariant Laws in Management Studies: a Reflective Dialogue in Defense of Case Studies , 1998 .

[16]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[17]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[18]  Karl-Erik Sveiby The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[19]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application , 1997 .

[20]  Hubert L. Dreyfus,et al.  Disclosing New Worlds: Entrepreneurship, Democratic Action, and the Cultivation of Solidarity , 1997 .

[21]  Sean Gadman Power Partnering: A strategy for business excellence in the 21st century , 1996 .

[22]  Brown,et al.  Organizational Commitment: Clarifying the Concept and Simplifying the Existing Construct Typology , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[23]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[24]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Overcoming the problems in information systems development by building and sustaining commitment , 1995 .

[25]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[26]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[27]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[28]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[29]  Kenneth J. Gergen,et al.  The Saturated Self , 1991 .

[30]  Nick Oliver,et al.  Rewards, investments, alternatives and organizational commitment: Empirical evidence and theoretical development , 1990 .

[31]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[32]  Bill Curtis,et al.  A field study of the software design process for large systems , 1988, CACM.

[33]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[34]  Terry Winograd,et al.  Understanding computers and cognition , 1986 .

[35]  J. Hage,et al.  Theories of Organizations: Form, Process, and Transformation. , 1982 .

[36]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[37]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  THE UNCERTAINTY OF THE PAST: ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING UNDER AMBIGUITY* , 1975 .

[38]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[39]  E. Johnsen Richard M. Cyert & James G. March, A Behavioral Theory of The Firm, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, 332 s. , 1964 .

[40]  G. Hegel,et al.  The Phenomenology of Spirit , 1979 .