Low efficiency of cytologic screening for cancer in situ of the cervix in older women

Cytologic screening for cervical cancer has proven to be beneficial in many countries, although the value of this intervention in women older than 50 years remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficiency of detecting cancer in situ by means of a cytologic smear at different ages, with special emphasis on the benefit of screening in women above the age of 50. We analyzed 466,275 smears taken in an open cohort of 118,890 women in Sweden between 1969 and 1988. The number of cancers in situ detected per 1,000 smears, the detection ratio, was used as an outcome measure in univariate analyses and in multivariate regression models. Cancer/n situ was detected in 1,076 women in the study cohort. The detection ratio peaked at ages 30 to 34 and decreased heavily during the next 15 years of age. The efficiency of taking smears at ages above 50 was only 20 per cent (OR, 0.19; 95% Cl, 0.14–0.26) of that at ages 30 to 34. These results were not changed when adjusting for time period and time interval since the previous smear. In spite of a high incidence of invasive cervical cancer in older women, the benefit of cytologic screening to detect cancer in situ above the age of 50 is uncertain. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  P. Sparén,et al.  Efficiency of organised and opportunistic cytological screening for cancer in situ of the cervix , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[2]  I. Duncan,et al.  Rationale for stopping cervical screening in women over 50. , 1993, BMJ.

[3]  T. Brett Opportunistic cervical screening among 50-70 year olds. A prospective study in general practice. , 1992, Australian Family Physician.

[4]  V. White,et al.  Barriers to cervical screening in older women. , 1992, Australian family physician.

[5]  J. Elder,et al.  Breast and cervical cancer screening in older women: the San Diego Medicare Preventive Health Project. , 1992, Preventive medicine.

[6]  J. Habbema,et al.  Epidemiological evidence for age-dependent regression of pre-invasive cervical cancer. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  H. Adami,et al.  Cytologic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in Sweden evaluated by identification and simulation. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[8]  A. Fletcher Screening for cancer of the cervix in elderly women , 1990, The Lancet.

[9]  H. Adami,et al.  Natural history of cervical neoplasia: consistent results obtained by an identification technique. , 1989, British Journal of Cancer.

[10]  N. Day,et al.  TRENDS IN MORTALITY FROM CERVICAL CANCER IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES: ASSOCIATION WITH ORGANISED SCREENING PROGRAMMES , 1987, The Lancet.

[11]  D. M. Parkin,et al.  The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales , 1985, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[12]  N. Day Effect of Cervical Cancer Screening in Scandinavia , 1984, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[13]  D. Parkin,et al.  Incidence and prevalence of preclinical carcinoma of cervix in a British population , 1982, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[14]  M. Hakama,et al.  EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR TWO COMPONENTS OF CERVICAL CANCER , 1981, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[15]  L. Coppleson,et al.  Observations on a model of the biology of carcinoma of the cervix: a poor fit between observation and theory. , 1975, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  D. Ashley EVIDENCE FOR THE EXISTENCE OF TWO FORMS OF CERVICAL CARCINOMA , 1966, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[17]  George N. Papanicolaou Herbert F. Traut,et al.  Diagnosis of uterine cancer by the vaginal smear , 1943 .

[18]  D. Celentano,et al.  Cervical cancer screening practices among older women: results from the Maryland Cervical Cancer Case-Control Study. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.