Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broad-leaved forest of China.

The classical environmental control model assumes that species distribution is determined by the spatial variation of underlying habitat conditions. This niche-based model has recently been challenged by the neutral theory of biodiversity which assumes that ecological drift is a key process regulating species coexistence. Understanding the mechanisms that maintain biodiversity in communities critically depends on our ability to decompose the variation of diversity into the contributions of different processes affecting it. Here we investigated the effects of pure habitat, pure spatial, and spatially structured habitat processes on the distributions of species richness and species composition in a recently established 24-ha stem-mapping plot in the subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of Gutianshan National Nature Reserve in East China. We used the new spatial analysis method of principal coordinates of neighbor matrices (PCNM) to disentangle the contributions of these processes. The results showed that (1) habitat and space jointly explained approximately 53% of the variation in richness and approximately 65% of the variation in species composition, depending on the scale (sampling unit size); (2) tree diversity (richness and composition) in the Gutianshan forest was dominantly controlled by spatially structured habitat (24%) and habitat-independent spatial component (29%); the spatially independent habitat contributed a negligible effect (6%); (3) distributions of richness and species composition were strongly affected by altitude and terrain convexity, while the effects of slope and aspect were weak; (4) the spatial distribution of diversity in the forest was dominated by broad-scaled spatial variation; (5) environmental control on the one hand and unexplained spatial variation on the other (unmeasured environmental variables and neutral processes) corresponded to spatial structures with different scales in the Gutianshan forest plot; and (6) five habitat types were recognized; a few species were statistically significant indicators of three of these habitats, whereas two habitats had no significant indicator species. The results suggest that the diversity of the forest is equally governed by environmental control (30%) and neutral processes (29%). In the fine-scale analysis (10 x 10 m cells), neutral processes dominated (43%) over environmental control (20%).

[1]  P. Legendre,et al.  Assessing the scale-specific importance of niches and other spatial processes on beta diversity: a case study from a temperate forest , 2009, Oecologia.

[2]  Stéphane Dray,et al.  Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM) , 2006 .

[3]  David Tilman,et al.  Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: a stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Stern.  CONCLUDING REMARKS OF THE CHAIRMAN , 1950 .

[5]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Predicting Population Trends from Size Distributions: A Direct Test in a Tropical Tree Community , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[6]  B. Gilbert,et al.  FERN COMMUNITY ASSEMBLY: THE ROLES OF CHANCE AND THE ENVIRONMENT AT LOCAL AND INTERMEDIATE SCALES , 2005 .

[7]  T. Bailey.  Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists , 2006 .

[8]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50‐ha neotropical forest plot , 2001 .

[9]  R. Whittaker.  Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[10]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  SPECIES DIVERSITY PATTERNS DERIVED FROM SPECIES–AREA MODELS , 2002 .

[11]  Zhenghua Hu,et al.  Forest vegetation types in Gutianshan Natural Reserve in Zhejiang , 2001 .

[12]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains , 1956 .

[13]  Luís Borda-de-Água,et al.  Scaling Biodiversity: Scaling biodiversity under neutrality , 2007 .

[14]  Calyampudi R. Rao.  The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research , 1964 .

[15]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  R. Condit.  Research in large, long-term tropical forest plots. , 1995, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  P. Legendre,et al.  ANALYZING BETA DIVERSITY: PARTITIONING THE SPATIAL VARIATION OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION DATA , 2005 .

[18]  P. Legendre,et al.  SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES AND INDICATOR SPECIES:THE NEED FOR A FLEXIBLE ASYMMETRICAL APPROACH , 1997 .

[19]  P. Legendre,et al.  Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation , 1992 .

[20]  Hanna Tuomisto,et al.  DISSECTING THE SPATIAL STRUCTURE OF ECOLOGICAL DATA AT MULTIPLE SCALES , 2004 .

[21]  R. Whittaker.  Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California , 1960 .

[22]  Dominique Gravel,et al.  Reconciling niche and neutrality: the continuum hypothesis. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[23]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  Measuring beta diversity for presence–absence data , 2003 .

[24]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices , 2002 .

[25]  P. Legendre,et al.  Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. , 2006, Ecology.

[26]  W. Gies,et al.  Supplement , 1930 .

[27]  Richard Condit,et al.  The Importance of Demographic Niches to Tree Diversity , 2006, Science.

[28]  G. De’ath.  MULTIVARIATE REGRESSION TREES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR MODELING SPECIES–ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS , 2002 .

[29]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Environmental control and spatial structure in ecological communities: an example using oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatei) , 1994, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[30]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Studying beta diversity: ecological variation partitioning by multiple regression and canonical analysis , 2008 .

[31]  R. Condit,et al.  Tree species distributions and local habitat variation in the Amazon: large forest plot in eastern Ecuador , 2004 .

[32]  James Rosindell,et al.  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography , 2010, Scholarpedia.

[33]  J. T. Curtis,et al.  An Ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin , 1957 .

[34]  E. Leigh,et al.  Tropical forest diversity and dynamism : findings from a large-scale plot network , 2004 .

[35]  Richard Condit,et al.  An Ecosystem Report on the Panama Canal: Monitoring the Status of the Forest Communities and the Watershed , 2002, Environmental monitoring and assessment.