Collaborative versus individual use of regulative software scaffolds during scientific inquiry learning

Scaffolds to plan, monitor, and evaluate learning within technology-enhanced inquiry and modeling environments are often little used by students. One reason may be that students frequently work collaboratively in these settings and their group work may interfere with the use of regulative supports. This research compared the use of regulative scaffolds within an inquiry and modeling environment by paired and single students. Pairs were predicted to make less use of regulative scaffolds than singles. To validate this assumption 42 high-school students worked either individually (n = 18) or in pairs (n = 12) within an inquiry learning environment. Two regulative scaffolds were used by both conditions to assist them with planning, monitoring, and evaluating their investigative efforts; a cognitive tool called the Process coordinator and a Laboratory report template. Results showed that pairs achieved significantly higher learning outcomes than individual students, and although there was a strong trend of increased regulative tool use by individual students, the frequency and duration of regulative tool use did not differ significantly between conditions. Implications of these effects for regulative scaffold design and use are discussed and suggestions for future research are advanced.

[1]  Elizabeth A. Davis,et al.  Scaffolding students' knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE , 2000 .

[2]  J. Elshout,et al.  Metacognitive mediation in learning with computer-based simulations , 1994 .

[3]  Douglas Kauffman.  Self-Regulated Learning in Web-Based Environments: Instructional Tools Designed to Facilitate Cognitive Strategy Use, Metacognitive Processing, and Motivational Beliefs , 2004 .

[4]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scaffolds for computer simulation based scientific discovery learning , 2006 .

[5]  P. Winne,et al.  Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1995 .

[6]  Stephanie D. Teasley.  The role of talk in children's peer collaborations. , 1995 .

[7]  Steven M. Crooks,et al.  Effects of Cooperative Learning and Learner-Control Modes in Computer-Based Instruction. , 1996 .

[8]  Christine Howe,et al.  Explanatory concepts in physics: towards a principled evaluation of teaching materials , 1991 .

[9]  Min Liu,et al.  An analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment , 2005 .

[10]  E. Davis.  Prompting Middle School Science Students for Productive Reflection: Generic and Directed Prompts , 2003 .

[11]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Enabling Students to Construct Theories of Collaborative Inquiry and Reflective Learning: Computer Support for Metacognitive Development , 1999 .

[12]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Scientific Discovery Learning with Computer Simulations of Conceptual Domains , 1998 .

[13]  Min Liu,et al.  Cognitive tools, individual differences, and group processing as mediating factors in a hypermedia environment , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  E. Cohen.  Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .

[15]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Training in Self-Explanation and Self-Regulation Strategies: Investigating the Effects of Knowledge Acquisition Activities on Problem Solving , 1995 .

[16]  E. Harskamp,et al.  Structured Collaboration versus Individual Learning in Solving Physics Problems , 2006 .

[17]  Susan M. Land.  Cognitive requirements for learning with open-ended learning environments , 2000 .

[18]  William Y. Lan,et al.  Self‐monitoring and its relationship with educational level and task importance , 2005 .

[19]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Regulative support for collaborative scientific inquiry learning , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[20]  Xiaodong Lin,et al.  Supporting Learning of Variable Control in a Computer-Based Biology Environment: Effects of Prompting College Students to Reflect on Their Own Thinking , 1999 .

[21]  Ton de Jong.  Computer simulations. Technological advances in inquiry learning. , 2006, Science.

[22]  N. Webb.  Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. , 1991 .

[23]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Scaffolding in technology-enhanced learning environments , 2007, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[24]  P. Pintrich.  The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[25]  Stephanie D. Teasley.  Constructing a Joint Problem Space: The Computer as a Tool for Sharing Knowledge , 1993 .

[26]  Marlene Scardamalia,et al.  Discourse About Ideas: Monitoring and Regulation in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Environments , 1998, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[27]  T. Jong,et al.  Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning , 2007 .

[28]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning To Solve Problems. Technical Report No. 9. , 1987 .

[29]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Co-Lab: research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[30]  Y. Lou,et al.  Within-Class Grouping: A Meta-Analysis , 1996 .

[31]  Y. Lou,et al.  Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 2001 .

[32]  Ton de Jong,et al.  Technological Advances in Inquiry Learning , 2006 .

[33]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Scaffolding students’ problem-solving processes in an ill-structured task using question prompts and peer interactions , 2003 .

[34]  Bracha Kramarski,et al.  How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? , 2006, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[35]  R. Azevedo,et al.  The Role of Self-Regulated Learning in Fostering Students' Conceptual Understanding of Complex Systems with Hypermedia , 2004 .

[36]  Steven M. Crooks,et al.  Effects of Cooperative and Individual Learning during Learner-Controlled Computer-Based Instruction , 1998 .

[37]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Tool use in computer-based learning environments: towards a research framework , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[38]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self-Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[39]  B. Zimmerman.  Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. , 2000 .

[40]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  Designing computer learning environments for engineering and computer science: The scaffolded knowledge integration framework , 1995 .

[41]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Do two heads search better than one? Effects of student collaboration on web search behaviour and search outcomes , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[42]  Kevin Oliver,et al.  Student Management of Web-Based Hypermedia Resources During Open-Ended Problem Solving , 2000 .