Categorical learning in pigeons: the role of texture and shape in complex static stimuli

Pigeons are known to be able to categorize a wide variety of visual stimulus classes. However, it remains unclear which are the characteristics of the perceptually relevant features employed to reach such good performance. Here, we investigate the relative contributions of texture and shape information to categorization decisions about complex natural classes. We trained three groups of pigeons to discriminate between sets of photorealistic frontal images of human faces according to sex and subsequently, tested them on different stimulus sets. Only the pigeons that were presented with texture information were successful at the discrimination task. Pigeons seem to possess a sophisticated texture processing system but are less capable in discriminating shapes. The results are discussed in terms of the possible evolutionary advantages of utilizing texture as a very general and potent perceptual dimension in the birds' visual environment.

[1]  M. Stephens,et al.  Animal Welfare , 1939, Nature.

[2]  D. Spalding.  The Principles of Psychology , 1873, Nature.

[3]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Fractal-Based Description of Natural Scenes , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Jeffrey S. Katz,et al.  Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. , 1997 .

[5]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Pigeon concept formation: successive and simultaneous acquisition. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  R. Cook,et al.  Pigeon perception and discrimination of rapidly changing texture stimuli. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  R. Cook,et al.  Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  S. Lea,et al.  Category discrimination by pigeons using five polymorphous features. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  J. Fetterman.  Dimensions of stimulus complexity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[10]  J. Cerella.  Visual classes and natural categories in the pigeon. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  L. Huber,et al.  Categorization of Prototypical Stimulus Classes by Pigeons , 1996 .

[12]  A Test of the Linear Feature Model of Polymorphous Concept Discrimination with Pigeons , 1993 .

[13]  D. G. Lander,et al.  The pigeon’s concept of pigeon , 1971 .

[14]  I. Biederman,et al.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Richard J. Herrnstein,et al.  Fish as a Natural Category for People and Pigeons1 , 1980 .

[16]  D S Blough,et al.  Discrimination of letters and random dot patterns by pigeons and humans. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[17]  Stephen E G Lea,et al.  Pigeons Learn the Concept of an ‘A’ , 1976, Perception.

[18]  S. D. Brown,et al.  Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): II. Synthetic models. , 1993, Journal of comparative psychology.

[19]  M. Wakita,et al.  Pigeons' discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Cognitive Aspects of Stimulus Control , 2018 .

[21]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[22]  W. K. Honig,et al.  Pigeons can discriminate locations presented in pictures. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[23]  S. Lea.  Complex General Process Learning in Nonmammalian Vertebrates , 1984 .

[24]  R. J. Herrnstein,et al.  Riddles of natural categorization , 1985 .

[25]  Geoffrey Hall,et al.  Animal cognition , 1985, Nature.

[26]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape , 1996, Vision Research.

[27]  Catriona M. E. Ryan,et al.  Unnatural Concepts and the Theory of Concept Discrimination in Birds , 2019, Quantitative Analyses of Behavior.

[28]  E. Brunswik.  Perception and the Representative Design of Psychological Experiments , 1957 .

[29]  M. Jitsumori,et al.  Categorical Discrimination of Human Facial Expressions by Pigeons: A Test of the Linear Feature Model , 1997 .

[30]  J. Overmier,et al.  Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[31]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[32]  Same-different texture discrimination in pigeons: testing competing models of discrimination and stimulus integration. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[33]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[34]  Catriona M. E. Ryan,et al.  Images of conspecifics as categories to be discriminated by pigeons and chickens: Slides, video tapes, stuffed birds and live birds , 1994, Behavioural Processes.

[35]  Juan D. Delius,et al.  Beyond sensation : visual cognition in pigeons , 1993 .

[36]  R. Lubow,et al.  High-order concept formation in the pigeon. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[37]  Sharon L. Greene,et al.  Pigeon visual memory capacity. , 1984 .

[38]  R. Dooling,et al.  Perception of conspecific faces by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus): I. Natural faces. , 1992, Journal of comparative psychology.

[39]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .

[40]  Fetterman Jg.  Dimensions of stimulus complexity. , 1996 .

[41]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Image Representations for Visual Learning , 1996, Science.

[42]  J. E. Mazur,et al.  Learning as accumulation: a reexamination of the learning curve. , 1978, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  John Cerella,et al.  The pigeon's analysis of pictures , 1980, Pattern Recognit..

[44]  R. J. Herrnstein,et al.  Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach , 1990, Cognition.

[45]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[46]  R. Shepard.  Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[47]  Michael L. Commons,et al.  Behavioral approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation , 2019 .

[48]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Complex Visual Concept in the Pigeon , 1964, Science.

[49]  Nikolaus F. Troje,et al.  Separation of texture and shape in images of faces for image coding and synthesis , 1997 .

[50]  A. M. Burton,et al.  Sex Discrimination: How Do We Tell the Difference between Male and Female Faces? , 1993, Perception.

[51]  R. Cook,et al.  Same-different texture discrimination and concept learning by pigeons. , 1995 .

[52]  R. Herrnstein,et al.  Natural concepts in pigeons. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[53]  T. Vetter,et al.  Representations of human faces , 1996 .

[54]  M. Jitsumori.  Category discrimination of artificial polymorphous stimuli based on feature learning. , 1993 .