Top-Down Cognitive and Linguistic Influences on the Suppression of Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions

Auditory sensation is often thought of as a bottom-up process, yet the brain exerts top-down control to affect how and what we hear. We report the discovery that the magnitude of top-down influence varies across individuals as a result of differences in linguistic background and executive function. Participants were 32 normal-hearing individuals (23 female) varying in language background (11 English monolinguals, 10 Korean-English late bilinguals, and 11 Korean-English early bilinguals), as well as cognitive abilities (working memory, cognitive control). To assess efferent control over inner ear function, participants were presented with speech-sounds (e.g., /ba/, /pa/) in one ear while spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAEs) were measured in the contralateral ear. SOAEs are associated with the amplification of sound in the cochlea, and can be used as an index of top-down efferent activity. Individuals with bilingual experience and those with better cognitive control experienced larger reductions in the amplitude of SOAEs in response to speech stimuli, likely as a result of greater efferent suppression of amplification in the cochlea. This suppression may aid in the critical task of speech perception by minimizing the disruptive effects of noise. In contrast, individuals with better working memory exert less control over the cochlea, possibly due to a greater capacity to process complex stimuli at later stages. These findings demonstrate that even peripheral mechanics of auditory perception are shaped by top-down cognitive and linguistic influences.

[1]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Competing activation in bilingual language processing: Within- and between-language competition , 2003, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[2]  T. Lunner,et al.  Cognitive Spare Capacity and Speech Communication: A Narrative Overview , 2014, BioMed research international.

[3]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  C. Berlin,et al.  Olivocochlear efferent suppression in classical musicians. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[5]  Lionel Collet,et al.  Function and plasticity of the medial olivocochlear system in musicians: A review , 2014, Hearing Research.

[6]  Nigel P. Cooper,et al.  Efferent‐mediated control of basilar membrane motion , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  J. Guinan Olivocochlear Efferents: Anatomy, Physiology, Function, and the Measurement of Efferent Effects in Humans , 2006, Ear and hearing.

[8]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Fast and Slow Effects of Medial Olivocochlear Efferent Activity in Humans , 2011, PloS one.

[9]  Dennis McFadden,et al.  On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions , 1993, Hearing Research.

[10]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Frequency tuning of the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex in humans. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  S. Neely,et al.  Changes in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions produced by acoustic stimulation of the contralateral ear , 1989, Hearing Research.

[12]  N. Fox,et al.  NIH Toolbox for Assessment of Neurological and Behavioral Function , 2013, Neurology.

[13]  Viorica Marian,et al.  Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension , 2011, Cognition.

[14]  C. Lam,et al.  Musician Enhancement for Speech-In-Noise , 2009, Ear and hearing.

[15]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Working Memory and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution as Revealed by ERPs: A Difficult Case for Activation Theories , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  Pascale Engel de Abreu Working memory in multilingual children: is there a bilingual effect? , 2011 .

[17]  Scott R. Schroeder,et al.  Bilingualism and Musicianship Enhance Cognitive Control , 2015, Neural plasticity.

[18]  Working Memory and Lexical Ambiguity Resolution as Revealed by ERPs: A Difficult Case for Activation Theories , 2003 .

[19]  Y. Tsal,et al.  Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[20]  T Kawase,et al.  Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  C. Vanaja,et al.  Functioning of Olivocochlear Bundle and Speech Perception in Noise , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[22]  N. Kraus,et al.  Musical Experience Limits the Degradative Effects of Background Noise on the Neural Processing of Sound , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Wong,et al.  Aging and cortical mechanisms of speech perception in noise , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  T. Sandoval,et al.  More use almost always a means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[25]  F. Craik,et al.  Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[26]  Stefan Stenfelt,et al.  Working Memory Capacity and Visual–Verbal Cognitive Load Modulate Auditory–Sensory Gating in the Brainstem: Toward a Unified View of Attention , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  C. Micheyl,et al.  Stronger bilateral efferent influences on cochlear biomechanical activity in musicians than in non-musicians , 1999, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  E. M. Burns,et al.  Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Margarita Kaushanskaya,et al.  The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[30]  Albert Costa,et al.  Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task , 2008, Cognition.

[31]  S. Khalfa,et al.  Evidence of peripheral auditory activity modulation by the auditory cortex in humans , 2001, Neuroscience.

[32]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Mechanical and acoustical influences on spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions , 1983, Hearing Research.

[33]  S. Dhar,et al.  Contralateral acoustic stimulation alters the magnitude and phase of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Nina Kraus,et al.  Musical training during early childhood enhances the neural encoding of speech in noise , 2012, Brain and Language.

[35]  A. Ibáñez,et al.  The Impact of Bilingualism on Working Memory: A Null Effect on the Whole May Not Be So on the Parts , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[36]  N. Kraus,et al.  Musical Experience and the Aging Auditory System: Implications for Cognitive Abilities and Hearing Speech in Noise , 2011, PloS one.

[37]  W. Revelle psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research , 2017 .

[38]  R. Margolis,et al.  Effect of ear-canal air pressure on evoked otoacoustic emissions. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  François Mauguière,et al.  Evidence for corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory activity in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  G. Thierry,et al.  Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign-language comprehension , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Paul H. Delano,et al.  Corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory responses , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[42]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Bilingualism in development: Language, literacy, and cognition. , 2001 .

[43]  Pascale M. J. Engel de Abreu Working memory in multilingual children: Is there a bilingual effect? , 2011, Memory.

[44]  Deborah Weiss,et al.  Performance of bilingual speakers on the English and Spanish versions of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT). , 2008, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[45]  Antoni Rodríguez-Fornells,et al.  Second Language Interferes with Word Production in Fluent Bilinguals: Brain Potential and Functional Imaging Evidence , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  S. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of Contralateral Acoustic Stimulation on Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions , 2010, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[47]  W. J. Murphy,et al.  New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects , 1993, Hearing Research.

[48]  E. Blom,et al.  The benefits of being bilingual: working memory in bilingual Turkish-Dutch children. , 2014, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[49]  Robert I. Jennrich,et al.  Gradient Projection Algorithms and Software for Arbitrary Rotation Criteria in Factor Analysis , 2005 .

[50]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[51]  N. Kraus,et al.  Playing Music for a Smarter Ear: Cognitive, Perceptual and Neurobiological Evidence. , 2011, Music perception.

[52]  Marc Ettlinger,et al.  Neuroanatomical Characteristics and Speech Perception in Noise in Older Adults , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[53]  F. Craik,et al.  Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  S Buus,et al.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.