Deep carbon reductions in California require electrification and integration across economic sectors

Meeting a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction target of 80% below 1990 levels in the year 2050 requires detailed long-term planning due to complexity, inertia, and path dependency in the energy system. A detailed investigation of supply and demand alternatives is conducted to assess requirements for future California energy systems that can meet the 2050 GHG target. Two components are developed here that build novel analytic capacity and extend previous studies: (1) detailed bottom-up projections of energy demand across the building, industry and transportation sectors; and (2) a high-resolution variable renewable resource capacity planning model (SWITCH) that minimizes the cost of electricity while meeting GHG policy goals in the 2050 timeframe. Multiple pathways exist to a low-GHG future, all involving increased efficiency, electrification, and a dramatic shift from fossil fuels to low-GHG energy. The electricity system is found to have a diverse, cost-effective set of options that meet aggressive GHG reduction targets. This conclusion holds even with increased demand from transportation and heating, but the optimal levels of wind and solar deployment depend on the temporal characteristics of the resulting load profile. Long-term policy support is found to be a key missing element for the successful attainment of the 2050 GHG target in California.

[1]  W. Nazaroff Exploring the consequences of climate change for indoor air quality , 2013 .

[2]  H. Cai,et al.  Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use , 2012 .

[3]  Matthias Fripp,et al.  Switch: a planning tool for power systems with large shares of intermittent renewable energy. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  J. H. Nelson,et al.  High-resolution modeling of the western North American power system demonstrates low-cost and low-carbon futures , 2012 .

[5]  W. R. Morrow,et al.  The Technology Path to Deep Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cuts by 2050: The Pivotal Role of Electricity , 2012, Science.

[6]  J. Long Piecemeal cuts won't add up to radical reductions , 2011, Nature.

[7]  Drew E. Bennett,et al.  Essential to Energy Efficiency, but Easy to Explain: Frequently Asked Questions about Decoupling , 2011 .

[8]  Christopher Yang California’s Energy Future: The View to 2050 - Summary Report , 2011 .

[9]  Christopher Yang,et al.  California’s Energy Future: Transportation Energy Use in California , 2011 .

[10]  Christopher M. Jones,et al.  Quantifying carbon footprint reduction opportunities for U.S. households and communities. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power, Part I: Technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials , 2011 .

[12]  Kara Clark,et al.  Western Wind and Solar Integration Study , 2011 .

[13]  S. A. Paipetis On Science and Technology , 2010 .

[14]  S. C. Jackson Parallel Pursuit of Near-Term and Long-Term Climate Mitigation , 2009, Science.

[15]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Estimation of Long-Term Energy Efficiency Potentials for California Buildings and Industry , 2009 .

[16]  Matthias Fripp,et al.  Optimal investment in wind and solar power in California , 2008 .

[17]  M. Rufo,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM ELECTRIC ENERGY EFFICIENCY POTENTIAL IN CALIFORNIA'S RESIDENTIAL SECTOR , 2007 .

[18]  Philip S. Schmidt Electricity and Industrial Productivity: A Technical and Economic Perspective , 1984 .