Transportation cost allocation on a fixed route

Five fairness criteria are analyzed based on comprehensive practical consideration.Allocation models and algorithms are developed to satisfy multiple fairness axioms.Allocation method has stable performance for both optimal and non-optimal routes.Computational studies validate the advantages by comparison with multiple methods. A fundamental problem for determining the service cost in logistics is to allocate the transportation cost on a given route. Our real application usually has 5-20 customers per route, and the routing to all customers or any subsets of customers may not be optimal with respect to total distance travelled. To identify the objective and evaluate different cost allocation methods, five fairness criteria are introduced. We investigate a number of popular allocation mechanisms to identify their properties on fairness and feasibility for implementation. A contribution constrained packing model is proposed to consider these multiple fairness criteria for cost allocation. To determine the proper parameters in our model for different routes, a modified Nelder-Mead algorithm with a simplex enlargement operation is introduced. Two approximation methods for computing excess rate, an important measure of a fair allocation, are analyzed and the original routing sequence approximation is recommended for application. Through a computational study, we demonstrate that our method satisfies an important set of fairness axioms and improves cost allocation from the existing allocation schemes within acceptable time requirements.

[1]  Peter Värbrand,et al.  The traveling salesman game: An application ofcost allocation in a gas and oil company , 1998, Ann. Oper. Res..

[2]  Martin W. P. Savelsbergh,et al.  Allocating Cost of Service to Customers in Inventory Routing , 2013, Oper. Res..

[3]  L. Shapley Cores of convex games , 1971 .

[4]  Michael Godfrey,et al.  Incorporating transportation costs into inventory replenishment decisions , 2002 .

[5]  Özlem Ergun,et al.  Allocating Costs in a Collaborative Transportation Procurement Network , 2008, Transp. Sci..

[6]  Duygu Yengin Characterizing the Shapley value in fixed-route traveling salesman problems with appointments , 2012, Int. J. Game Theory.

[7]  Terry L. Esper,et al.  The value of Collaborative transportation management (CTM): Its relationship to CPFR and information technology , 2003 .

[8]  Jeffrey C. Lagarias,et al.  Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions , 1998, SIAM J. Optim..

[9]  Lei Sun,et al.  Estimating the long-term cost to serve new customers in joint distribution , 2015, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[10]  Yoshio Okamoto Traveling salesman games with the Monge property , 2004, Discret. Appl. Math..

[11]  P. C. Fishburn,et al.  Fixed-Route Cost Allocation , 1983 .

[12]  Mikael Rönnqvist,et al.  Cost Allocation in Collaborative Forest Transportation , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Sándor P. Fekete,et al.  On approximately fair cost allocation in Euclidean TSP games , 1998, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[14]  Louis-Martin Rousseau,et al.  Cost allocation in the establishment of a collaborative transportation agreement—an application in the furniture industry , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[15]  Bo Dai,et al.  Profit allocation mechanisms for carrier collaboration in pickup and delivery service , 2012, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[16]  Markus Bläser,et al.  Approximately Fair Cost Allocation in Metric Traveling Salesman Games , 2007, Theory of Computing Systems.

[17]  Arie Tamir,et al.  On the core of a traveling salesman cost allocation game , 1989 .

[18]  James C. Bean,et al.  Genetic Algorithms and Random Keys for Sequencing and Optimization , 1994, INFORMS J. Comput..

[19]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[20]  Ozhan Yilmaz,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Collaboration among small shippers in a transportation market , 2011 .