Attachment, Coalescence, and Spreading of Carbon Dioxide Nanobubbles at Pyrite Surfaces.

Recently, it was reported that using CO2 as a flotation gas increases the flotation of auriferous pyrite from high carbonate gold ores of the Carlin Trend. In this regard, the influence of CO2 on bubble attachment at fresh pyrite surfaces was measured in the absence of collector using an induction timer, and it was found that nitrogen bubble attachment time was significantly reduced from 30 ms to less than 10 ms in CO2 saturated solutions. Details of CO2 bubble attachment at a fresh pyrite surface have been examined by atomic force microscopy (AFM) measurements and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and the results used to describe the subsequent attachment of a N2 bubble. As found from MD simulations, unlike the attached N2 bubble, which is stable and has a contact angle of about 90°, the CO2 bubble attaches, and spreads, wetting the fresh pyrite surface and forming a multilayer of CO2 molecules, corresponding to a contact angle of almost 180°. These MDS results are complemented by in situ AFM images, which show that, after attachment, CO2 nano-/microbubbles spread to form pancake bubbles at the fresh pyrite surface. In summary, it seems that CO2 bubbles have a propensity to spread, and whether CO2 exists as layers of CO2 molecules (gas pancakes) or as nano-/microbubbles, their presence at the fresh pyrite surface subsequently facilitates film rupture and attachment of millimeter N2 bubbles and, in this way, improves the flotation of pyrite.

[1]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Adsorption of corn starch molecules at hydrophobic mineral surfaces , 2018, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects.

[2]  Sandipta Roy,et al.  Role of In-Situ Generated CO2 Bubbles in Heterogeneous Nucleation of Solid Solutes in the Precipitation by Pressure Reduction of Gas-Expanded Liquid (PPRGEL) Process , 2017 .

[3]  KimMi-Sug,et al.  Effect of Zeta Potential on Collision-Attachment Coefficient and Removal Efficiency for Dissolved Carbon Dioxide Flotation , 2017 .

[4]  M. Çelik,et al.  Effect of negative inertial forces on bubble-particle collision via implementation of Schulze collision efficiency in general flotation rate constant equation , 2017 .

[5]  Qi Liu,et al.  Interaction Mechanisms between Air Bubble and Molybdenite Surface: Impact of Solution Salinity and Polymer Adsorption. , 2017, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  The surface state of hematite and its wetting characteristics. , 2016, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  U. Peuker,et al.  Study of nanobubbles on hydrophilic and hydrophobic alumina surfaces , 2016 .

[8]  D. Lohse,et al.  Stability of Surface Nanobubbles: A Molecular Dynamics Study. , 2016, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[9]  M. Çelik,et al.  Effect of roughness and shape factor on flotation characteristics of glass beads , 2016 .

[10]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Molecular features of water films created with bubbles at silica surfaces , 2015 .

[11]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Effect of Surface Oxidation on Interfacial Water Structure at a Pyrite (100) Surface as Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulation , 2015 .

[12]  J. Zawała,et al.  Air-assisted bubble immobilization at hydrophilic porous surface , 2014 .

[13]  Hongjie An,et al.  Interfacial nanobubbles are leaky: permeability of the gas/water interface. , 2014, ACS nano.

[14]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Simulation and Analysis of Interfacial Water at Selected Sulfide Mineral Surfaces under Anaerobic Conditions , 2014 .

[15]  Jun Hu,et al.  Mechanical mapping of nanobubbles by PeakForce atomic force microscopy , 2013 .

[16]  A. Nguyen,et al.  Nanobubbles do not sit alone at the solid-liquid interface. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[17]  R. Dagastine,et al.  Anomalous stability of carbon dioxide in pH-controlled bubble coalescence. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  Ashish Kumar,et al.  Effects of solvency and interfacial nanobubbles on surface forces and bubble attachment at solid surfaces. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[19]  O. Ozdemir,et al.  A review of induction and attachment times of wetting thin films between air bubbles and particles and its relevance in the separation of particles by flotation. , 2010, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[20]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Direct measurement of particle–bubble interaction forces using atomic force microscopy , 2008 .

[21]  T. Dąbroś,et al.  Influence of Bubble Kinetic Energy on its Bouncing During Collisions with Various Interfaces , 2008 .

[22]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Kinetics of CO2 nanobubble formation at the solid/water interface. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[23]  M. Krasowska,et al.  Wetting films in attachment of the colliding bubble. , 2007, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[24]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Influence of very small bubbles on particle/bubble heterocoagulation. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[25]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Pyrite activation in amyl xanthate flotation with nitrogen , 2006 .

[26]  Vincent S J Craig,et al.  Physical properties of nanobubbles on hydrophobic surfaces in water and aqueous solutions. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[27]  P. Gane,et al.  Interaction forces between talc and hydrophobic particles probed by AFM , 2006 .

[28]  Liguang Wang,et al.  Hydrophobic forces in thin aqueous films and their role in film thinning , 2005 .

[29]  M. Krasowska,et al.  Influence of surface active substances on bubble motion and collision with various interfaces. , 2005, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[30]  B. Klösgen,et al.  Nanobubbles give evidence of incomplete wetting at a hydrophobic interface. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[31]  A. Wenger,et al.  Rupture of wetting films caused by nanobubbles. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[32]  Anh V. Nguyen,et al.  Colloidal Science of Flotation , 2003 .

[33]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  Colloid Stability and the Influence of Dissolved Gas , 2003 .

[34]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Nanobubbles on solid surface imaged by atomic force microscopy , 2000 .

[35]  N. Ishida,et al.  Nano Bubbles on a Hydrophobic Surface in Water Observed by Tapping-Mode Atomic Force Microscopy , 2000 .

[36]  Michael W. Mahoney,et al.  A five-site model for liquid water and the reproduction of the density anomaly by rigid, nonpolarizable potential functions , 2000 .

[37]  P. Behra,et al.  Surface Oxidation of Pyrite as a Function of pH , 1998 .

[38]  R. Yoon,et al.  Application of Extended DLVO Theory, IV: Derivation of Flotation Rate Equation from First Principles , 1996 .

[39]  J. Ralston,et al.  Surface and Capillary Forces Affecting Air Bubble−Particle Interactions in Aqueous Electrolyte , 1996 .

[40]  Peter G. Kusalik,et al.  The Spatial Structure in Liquid Water , 1994, Science.

[41]  Phil Attard,et al.  BUBBLES, CAVITIES, AND THE LONG-RANGED ATTRACTION BETWEEN HYDROPHOBIC SURFACES , 1994 .

[42]  W. Goddard,et al.  UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations , 1992 .

[43]  Jan D. Miller,et al.  Induction-time measurements at a particle bed , 1989 .

[44]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  The hydrophobic interaction is long range, decaying exponentially with distance , 1982, Nature.

[45]  Teruo Takahashi,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL STUDY OF BUBBLE FORMATION IN DISSOLVED AIR PRESSURE FLOTATION , 1979 .

[46]  D. Fornasiero,et al.  The influence of dissolved gas on the interactions between surfaces of different hydrophobicity in aqueous media Part II. A spectroscopic study , 1999 .