Cooperative Strategies and Optimal Scheduling for Tree Networks

In this paper, we develop and analyze a low-complexity cooperative protocol that significantly increases the average throughput of multi-hop upstream transmissions for wireless tree networks. We consider a system in which transmissions are assigned to nodes in a collision free, spatial time division fashion. This protocol exploits the broadcast nature of wireless networks where the communication channel is shared between multiple adjacent nodes within interference range. For any upstream end-to-end flow in the tree, each intermediate node receives information from both one-hop and two-hop neighbors and transmits only sufficient information such that the next upstream one-hop neighbor will be able to decode the packet. This approach can be viewed as the generalization of the classical three node relay channel for end-to-end flows in which each intermediate node becomes successively source, relay and destination. We derive the achievable rate and propose an optimal schedule that realizes this rate for any regular tree network. We show that our protocol dramatically outperforms the conventional scheme where intermediate nodes simply forward the packets hop by hop. At high signal-to-noise ratio, it yields approximatively 80% throughput gain.

[1]  Sanjeev R. Kulkarni,et al.  Degraded Gaussian multirelay channel: capacity and optimal power allocation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[2]  Ram Ramanathan,et al.  Challenges: a radically new architecture for next generation mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, MobiCom '05.

[3]  Matthew C. Valenti,et al.  Distributed turbo coded diversity for relay channel , 2003 .

[4]  Michael Gastpar,et al.  Cooperative strategies and capacity theorems for relay networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Ashutosh Sabharwal,et al.  LDPC Code Design for Half-Duplex Decode-and-Forward Relaying , 2005 .

[6]  Anders Høst-Madsen,et al.  Capacity bounds and power allocation for wireless relay channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[7]  Massimo Franceschetti,et al.  Lower bounds on data collection time in sensory networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[9]  Ashutosh Sabharwal,et al.  Half-Duplex Estimate-and-Forward Relaying: Bounds and Code Design , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[10]  Gregory W. Wornell,et al.  Cooperative diversity in wireless networks: Efficient protocols and outage behavior , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Jean-Pierre Hubaux,et al.  A Fair Scheduling for Wireless Mesh Networks , 2005 .

[12]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  Towards an information theory of large networks: an achievable rate region , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[13]  A. Glavieux,et al.  Near Shannon limit error-correcting coding and decoding: Turbo-codes. 1 , 1993, Proceedings of ICC '93 - IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[14]  Leonard Kleinrock,et al.  Spatial TDMA: A Collision-Free Multihop Channel Access Protocol , 1985, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[15]  E. Meulen,et al.  Three-terminal communication channels , 1971, Advances in Applied Probability.

[16]  Elza Erkip,et al.  User cooperation diversity. Part I. System description , 2003, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[17]  Ramjee Prasad,et al.  OFDM for Wireless Multimedia Communications , 1999 .

[18]  Zygmunt J. Haas,et al.  On the throughput enhancement of the downstream channel in cellular radio networks through multihop relaying , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[19]  Abbas El Gamal,et al.  Capacity theorems for the relay channel , 1979, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.