The applicability of the renewable energy directive calculation to assess the sustainability of biogas production.

Biogas production processes are often multifunctional systems, which also produce fertilizers from digested sludge. The environmental impacts of such systems are usually determined using life cycle assessment (LCA). There are alternative approaches to conduct the LCA, e.g., allocation of emissions based on a product's and co-product's energy content according to the Renewable Energy Directive (RED), or substitution without allocation according to the ISO 14040 standard. We calculated the climate change impacts of biogas production using these two alternative methods, whilst also considering process modifications of the base case biogas production process. The aim was to find out whether the production system achieves the saving targets for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions set by the RED. Since the RED enables different interpretations of its calculation rules, we created four case studies representing alternative ways to allocate the emissions to the reject water and solid fractions separated from the sludge. Consequently, our emission estimates for the base case vary between 16.9 and 47.7g CO2/MJ, while the emission savings range from 42% to 80%. Most of the case studies achieved the most stringent saving target (60%).

[1]  Peter Eder,et al.  End-of-Waste Criteria , 2009 .

[2]  G. P. Hammond,et al.  Greenhouse gas reporting for biofuels: A comparison between the RED, RTFO and PAS2050 methodologies , 2011 .

[3]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  A critical review of the applicability of biodiesel and grass biomethane as biofuels to satisfy both biofuel targets and sustainability criteria , 2011 .

[4]  Pasi Mattila,et al.  Development of the ammonia emission inventory in Finland. Revised model for agriculture , 2009 .

[5]  K. Shine Radiative Forcing of Climate Change , 2000 .

[6]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[7]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[8]  S. Sohi Agriculture, forestry and other land use , 2014 .

[9]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Life cycle assessment , 1997, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[10]  Martina Poeschl,et al.  Environmental impacts of biogas deployment – Part II: life cycle assessment of multiple production and utilization pathways , 2012 .

[11]  Juha Helenius,et al.  Comparison of energy and greenhouse gas balances of biogas with other transport biofuel options based on domestic agricultural biomass in Finland. , 2008 .

[13]  T. Rehl,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy generation from biogas—Attributional vs. consequential approach , 2012 .

[14]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[15]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions , 2006 .

[17]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Life-cycle-assessment of the historical development of air pollution control and energy recovery in waste incineration. , 2010, Waste management.