E-Learning System Implementation: Implications from the Construal Level Theory

Understanding the factors that affect users’ acceptance of e-learning systems is critical for the success of adopting an e-learning system. Drawing upon the Construal Level Theory and the Technology Acceptance Model, we propose that the users’ construal level of the e-learning system would interact with users’ perceptions of the system (i.e., the perceived ease of use [PEoU] and perceived usefulness [PU]) and affect their attitude toward using the system and hence usage intention. A lower construal level would strengthen the effect of PU on the respondents’ attitude toward using the system. By contrast, a higher construal level would strengthen the effect of PEoU on attitude using the system. Data collected from 131 subjects in a laboratory experiment support our research model. Theoretical contributions and implications of this research are discussed.

[1]  E. Wan,et al.  Regulating Risk or Risking Regulation? Construal Levels and Depletion Effects in the Processing of Health Messages , 2009 .

[2]  Y. Trope,et al.  The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. , 2002 .

[3]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior. , 2007, Journal of consumer psychology : the official journal of the Society for Consumer Psychology.

[4]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal levels and self-control. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Zeying Wan,et al.  Why people benefit from e-learning differently: The effects of psychological processes on e-learning outcomes , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[6]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[7]  Charlotte H. Mason,et al.  Collinearity, power, and interpretation of multiple regression analysis. , 1991 .

[8]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  Construal level theory , 2007 .

[9]  Y. Trope,et al.  Construal-level theory of psychological distance. , 2010, Psychological review.

[10]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Selin A. Malkoc,et al.  Choosing Here and Now vs. There and Later: The Moderating Role of Psychological Distance on Assortment Size Preferences , 2012 .

[12]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Y. Trope,et al.  The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. , 1998 .

[14]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[15]  Y. Trope,et al.  The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others' self-regulatory efforts ☆ , 2004 .

[16]  P. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Counterfactual Thinking and Advertising Responses , 2002 .

[17]  Canan Ulu,et al.  Consuming Now or Later? , 2005, Psychological science.

[18]  P. V. Lange,et al.  Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology , 2011 .

[19]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. , 1989 .

[20]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems , 2003, Inf. Manag..