Does Planning Work?: Testing the Implementation of Local Environmental Planning in Florida

Abstract The lack of empirical studies measuring the efficacy of plans and degree of local plan implementation subsequent to adoption represents one of the greatest gaps in planning research. This article addresses the need to test the effectiveness of environmental planning and plan implementation by examining the spatial pattern of wetland development permits over a io-year period in Florida. Specifically, our study compares the original land use design of comprehensive plans with subsequent development activity. We identify significant clusters of permits granted for wetland development and evaluate those locations against the adopted future land use maps for all county and city jurisdictions across the state. Findings indicate that development patterns that significantly deviate from the original intent of the adopted plans tend to occur in specific locations and under certain conditions. In addition, plans containing specific environmental and plan implementation policies are correlated with a greater degree of plan implementation. Based on the results, we discuss policy implications for improving plan performance at the local level and establishing a stronger link between plan content and plan implementation.

[1]  H W Calkins,et al.  The Planning Monitor: An Accountability Theory of Plan Evaluation , 1979 .

[2]  Rachelle Alterman,et al.  Implementation of Urban Land Use Plans , 1978 .

[3]  Sheila Peck.  Planning for Biodiversity: Issues And Examples , 1998 .

[4]  John M. Bryson.  There is No Substitute for an Empirical Defense of Planning and Planners , 1991 .

[5]  Peter P.J. Driessen.  Performance and Implementing Institutions in Rural Land Development , 1997 .

[6]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  The Ecology of Place: Planning for Environment, Economy, and Community , 1997 .

[7]  Emily Talen,et al.  After the Plans: Methods to Evaluate the Implementation Success of Plans , 1996 .

[8]  M. Clawson.  Suburban Land Conversion in the United States: An Economic and Governmental Process , 2011 .

[9]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing , 1973 .

[10]  Mark Seasons,et al.  Monitoring and Evaluation in Municipal Planning: Considering the Realities , 2003 .

[11]  Emily Talen,et al.  Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning , 1996 .

[12]  R. Burby.  Making Plans that Matter: Citizen Involvement and Government Action , 2003 .

[13]  E R Alexander,et al.  Planning and Plan Implementation: Notes on Evaluation Criteria , 1989 .

[14]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  Evaluation of Strategic Plans: The Performance Principle , 1997 .

[15]  S. Brody,et al.  Evaluating Ecosystem Management Capabilities at the Local Level in Florida: Identifying Policy Gaps Using Geographic Information Systems , 2003, Environmental management.

[16]  Emily Talen,et al.  Success, Failure, and Conformance: An Alternative Approach to Planning Evaluation , 1997 .

[17]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  IntergovernmentalEnvironmental Planning: Addressing the Commitment Conundrum , 1998 .

[18]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  The Performance of Spatial Planning , 2000 .

[19]  William C. Baer,et al.  General Plan Evaluation Criteria: An Approach to Making Better Plans , 1997 .

[20]  S. Brody.  Implementing the Principles of Ecosystem Management Through Local Land Use Planning , 2003 .

[21]  P. May,et al.  Making Governments Plan: State Experiments in Managing Land Use , 1997 .

[22]  Samuel D. Brody,et al.  Measuring the Effects of Stakeholder Participation on the Quality of Local Plans Based on the Principles of Collaborative Ecosystem Management , 2003 .

[23]  P. Berke,et al.  The Influence of State Planning Mandates on Local Plan Quality , 1994 .

[24]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .