Evaluation of differences in brain neurophysiology and morphometry associated with hand function in individuals with chronic stroke.

PURPOSE Rehabilitation interventions need to be optimized to maximize therapeutic effects and minimize stroke-related disability. However, a comprehensive understanding of the neural substrates underlying recovery is lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate relationships between brain anatomy, physiology and hand motor function in individuals with chronic stroke. METHODS Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approaches were used to evaluate cortical excitability and brain structural morphometry in individuals with chronic stroke. Hemispheric differences and relationships between these measures and hand dexterity were evaluated. RESULTS Hemispheric differences were observed for TMS and MRI measures. Bilateral hand dexterity correlated with TMS resting motor threshold and precentral gyral thickness. Transcallosal inhibition across hemispheres was positively associated with midcallosal white matter volume. Regression modeling results demonstrated that combining TMS and MRI measures predicted unique amounts of variance in hand dexterity. CONCLUSIONS RESULTS confirm and extend findings showing differences in brain structure and function after stroke. RESULTS suggested a structure-function relationship underlying interhemispheric connectivity in chronic stroke. The utility of combined TMS and MRI measures to predict motor function can be used in future investigations to aid identifying optimal biomarkers of stroke recovery to predict response to rehabilitation to maximize treatment outcomes.

[1]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[2]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[3]  S. F. Witelson.  Hand and sex differences in the isthmus and genu of the human corpus callosum. A postmortem morphological study. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  David G. Jacobs.  The Human Brain , 1992, Neurology.

[5]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning , 1995, Nature.

[7]  R. P. Stroemer,et al.  Neocortical neural sprouting, synaptogenesis, and behavioral recovery after neocortical infarction in rats. , 1995, Stroke.

[8]  M. Hallett,et al.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Babak Boroojerdi,et al.  Transcallosal inhibition in cortical and subcortical cerebral vascular lesions , 1996, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[10]  P M Rossini,et al.  Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke. A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. , 1997, Stroke.

[11]  J. Kleim,et al.  Functional reorganization of the rat motor cortex following motor skill learning. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Yili,et al.  Neuronal Damage and Plasticity Identified by Microtubule-Associated Protein 2, Growth-Associated Protein 43, and Cyclin D1 Immunoreactivity After Focal Cerebral Ischemia in Rats , 1998 .

[13]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[14]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[15]  P M Rossini,et al.  Applications of magnetic cortical stimulation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[16]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Applications of magnetic cortical stimulation. , 1999 .

[17]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[18]  J. Liepert,et al.  Motor cortex disinhibition in acute stroke , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musician , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  S. Carmichael,et al.  New Patterns of Intracortical Projections after Focal Cortical Stroke , 2001, Neurobiology of Disease.

[21]  J. Kleim,et al.  Motor Learning-Dependent Synaptogenesis Is Localized to Functionally Reorganized Motor Cortex , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[22]  E. Wassermann.  Variation in the response to transcranial magnetic brain stimulation in the general population , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[23]  P. Rossini,et al.  Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a cross-sectional fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  S. Cramer,et al.  Motor Cortex Organization After Stroke Is Related to Side of Stroke and Level of Recovery , 2003, Stroke.

[26]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  J. Kleim,et al.  Cortical Synaptogenesis and Motor Map Reorganization Occur during Late, But Not Early, Phase of Motor Skill Learning , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[29]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  A unified approach for morphometric and functional data analysis in young, old, and demented adults using automated atlas-based head size normalization: reliability and validation against manual measurement of total intracranial volume , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  Julie Duque,et al.  Transcallosal inhibition in chronic subcortical stroke , 2005, NeuroImage.

[31]  Steven C. Cramer,et al.  Somatotopy and movement representation sites following cortical stroke , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  S. Carmichael,et al.  Growth-associated gene expression after stroke: evidence for a growth-promoting region in peri-infarct cortex , 2005, Experimental Neurology.

[33]  Rick M Dijkhuizen,et al.  Structural and functional plasticity in the somatosensory cortex of chronic stroke patients. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  U. Ziemann,et al.  Differences of the ipsilateral silent period in small hand muscles , 2006, Muscle & nerve.

[35]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited—Comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, NeuroImage.

[36]  Khader M Hasan,et al.  Focal Wallerian degeneration of the corpus callosum in large middle cerebral artery stroke: Serial diffusion tensor imaging , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[37]  W. Byblow,et al.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[38]  Lynne V. Gauthier,et al.  Remodeling the Brain: Plastic Structural Brain Changes Produced by Different Motor Therapies After Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[39]  Robert Chen,et al.  The clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  Hui Chen,et al.  Test-Retest Reproducibility and Smallest Real Difference of 5 Hand Function Tests in Patients With Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[41]  Lynne V. Gauthier,et al.  Improvement After Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy Is Independent of Infarct Location in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2009, Stroke.

[42]  Y. H. Kwon,et al.  Transcallosal fibers from corticospinal tract in patients with cerebral infarct. , 2009, NeuroRehabilitation.

[43]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  K. Ikoma,et al.  Correlation of motor function with transcallosal and intracortical inhibition after stroke. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[45]  Ho-Ling Liu,et al.  Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Control Intervention in Patients with Stroke: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2010, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[46]  Robert Lindenberg,et al.  Predicting functional motor potential in chronic stroke patients using diffusion tensor imaging , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[47]  L. Boyd,et al.  Both projection and commissural pathways are disrupted in individuals with chronic stroke: investigating microstructural white matter correlates of motor recovery , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[48]  G. B. Pike,et al.  Changes in Callosal Motor Fiber Integrity after Subcortical Stroke of the Pyramidal Tract , 2012, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[49]  Wynn Legon,et al.  Primary motor cortex excitability is modulated with bimanual training , 2012, Neuroscience Letters.

[50]  Matthew Petoe,et al.  The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[51]  R. Seidler,et al.  Task-dependent effects of interhemispheric inhibition on motor control , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[52]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[53]  Philip J. A. Dean,et al.  Cortical thickness changes in the non-lesioned hemisphere associated with non-paretic arm immobilization in modified CI therapy☆ , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[54]  Structural Damage and Functional Reorganization in Ipsilesional M1 in Well-Recovered Patients With Subcortical Stroke , 2014 .

[55]  L. Boyd,et al.  5 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the ipsilesional sensory cortex enhances motor learning after stroke , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[56]  Chunshui Yu,et al.  Structural Damage and Functional Reorganization in Ipsilesional M1 in Well-Recovered Patients With Subcortical Stroke , 2014, Stroke.