A Study of How Information System Professionals Comprehend Indirect and Direct Speech Acts in Project Communication

Research problem: Indirect communication is prevalent in business communication practices. For information systems (IS) projects that require professionals from multiple disciplines to work together, the use of indirect communication may hinder successful design, implementation, and maintenance of these systems. Drawing on the Speech Act Theory (SAT), this study investigates how direct and indirect speech acts may influence language comprehension in the setting of communication problems inherent in IS projects. Research questions: (1) Do participating subjects, who are IS professionals, differ in their comprehension of indirect and direct speech acts? (2) Do participants display different attention processes in their comprehension of indirect and direct speech acts? (3) Do participants' attention processes influence their comprehension of indirect and direct speech acts? Literature review: We review two relevant areas of theory-polite speech acts in professional communication and SAT. First, a broad review that focuses on literature related to the use of polite speech acts in the workplace and in information system (IS) projects suggests the importance of investigating speech acts by professionals. In addition, the SAT provides the theoretical framework guiding this study and the development of hypotheses. Methodology: The current study uses a quantitative approach. A between-groups experiment design was employed to test how direct and indirect speech acts influence the language comprehension of participants. Forty-three IS professionals participated in the experiment. In addition, through the use of eye-tracking technology, this study captured the attention process and analyzed the relationship between attention and comprehension. Results and discussion: The results show that the directness of speech acts significantly influences participants' attention process, which, in turn, significantly affects their comprehension. In addition, the findings indicate that indirect speech acts, if employed by IS professionals to communicate with others, may easily be distorted or misunderstood. Professionals and managers of organizations should be aware that effective communication in interdisciplinary projects, such as IS development, is not easy, and that reliance on polite or indirect communication may inhibit the generation of valid information.

[1]  Zbigniew H. Przasnyski,et al.  On Information Systems Project Abandonment: An Exploratory Study of Organizational Practices , 1991, MIS Q..

[2]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: general principles and differences due to culture and gender. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  A Comparison of Two Process Tracing Methods for Choice Tasks , 1996 .

[4]  J. O'Regan.  Eye movements and reading. , 1990, Reviews of oculomotor research.

[5]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Looking To Understand: The Coupling Between Speakers' and Listeners' Eye Movements and Its Relationship to Discourse Comprehension , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  J. Yum.  The impact of confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia , 1988 .

[7]  Mary Lacity,et al.  Understanding Qualitative Data: A Framework of Text Analysis Methods , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Sam Glucksberg,et al.  Beyond Literal Meanings: The Psychology of Allusion , 1991 .

[9]  J. Henderson.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Behavioral Norms and Expectations , 1988 .

[11]  Eyal M. Reingold,et al.  The time course of gaze bias in visual decision tasks , 2009 .

[12]  Thomas Wasow,et al.  Remarks on grammatical weight , 1997, Language Variation and Change.

[13]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[14]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye movements in reading: A tutorial review. , 1987 .

[15]  David A. Morand,et al.  Language and power: an empirical analysis of linguistic strategies used in superior–subordinate communication , 2000 .

[16]  J. Searle,et al.  Expression and Meaning. , 1982 .

[17]  T. Holtgraves.  Preference Organization and Reply Comprehension , 2000 .

[18]  Thomas Holtgraves,et al.  Interpreting Indirect Replies , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Tom L. Roberts,et al.  Project characteristics and group communication: an investigation , 2002 .

[20]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Polite responses to polite requests , 1980, Cognition.

[21]  K. Rayner,et al.  Eye Movements as Reflections of Comprehension Processes in Reading , 2006 .

[22]  G. Hofstede.  Culture′s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations , 2001 .

[23]  David Y. F. Ho,et al.  Filial piety and its psychological consequences. , 1996 .

[24]  Lynda Yates.  Speech act performance in workplace settings , 2010 .

[25]  Santoi Leung.  Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use , 2002 .

[26]  Eileen A. Hogan.  The Attention Economy: Understanding the New Currency of Business , 2001 .

[27]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[28]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Interrupting the cascade: Orienting contributes to decision making even in the absence of visual stimulation , 2007, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  David Graham Wastell,et al.  Learning Dysfunctions in Information Systems Development: Overcoming The Social Defenses With Transitional Objects , 1999, MIS Q..

[30]  Thomas Holtgraves,et al.  Comprehending indirect replies : When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? , 1999 .

[31]  K. T. Yeo,et al.  Critical failure factors in information system projects , 2002 .

[32]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Normative Beliefs and Shared Behavioral Expectations in Organizations: The Reliability and Validity of the Organizational Culture Inventory , 1993 .

[33]  Gibbs,et al.  Figurative thought and figurative language. , 1994 .

[34]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Processing of temporal information: Evidence from eye movements , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[35]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Communities, commonalities, and communication. , 1996 .

[36]  Grahame T. Bilbow,et al.  Cross-cultural impression management in the multicultural workplace: The special case of Hong Kong , 1997 .

[37]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[38]  J. Mackiewicz,et al.  The effects of tutor expertise in engineering writing: a linguistic analysis of writing tutors' comments , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[39]  Stephen W. Littlejohn.  Theories of Human Communication , 1978 .

[40]  Stephen Chen,et al.  The importance of language in global teams: A linguistic perspective , 2006 .

[41]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Overcoming organizational defenses : facilitating organizational learning , 1990 .

[42]  John J. Sosik,et al.  Why Information Systems Projects are Abandoned: A Leadership and Communication Theory and Exploratory Study , 2000, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[43]  Jukka Hyönä,et al.  Comprehending coherent and incoherent texts: evidence from eye movement patterns and recall performance , 1992 .

[44]  Chris Lam,et al.  Linguistic Politeness in Student-Team Emails: Its Impact on Trust Between Leaders and Members , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[45]  C. Argyris.  Good communication that blocks learning , 1994 .

[46]  Jo Mackiewicz,et al.  The Technical Editor as Diplomat: Linguistic Strategies for Balancing Clarity and Politeness , 2003 .

[47]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[48]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  John R. Searle,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1970 .

[50]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  ICIS Paper: Implications of Theories of Language for Information Systems , 1985, MIS Q..

[51]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Tracing Eye Movement Protocols with Cognitive Process Models , 1998 .

[52]  J. Ulijn,et al.  Non-face-to face international business negotiation: how is national culture reflected in this medium , 2001 .

[53]  Guo-Ming Chen,et al.  Toward Transcultural Understanding: A Harmony Theory of Chinese Communication , 2001 .

[54]  T. Holtgraves,et al.  Comprehending illocutionary force , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[55]  Menno D.T. de Jong,et al.  How do experts assess usability problems? An empirical analysis of cognitive shortcuts , 2009 .

[56]  Ramiro and,et al.  De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport , 2000 .

[57]  Kim Sydow Campbell,et al.  Explanations in Negative Messages: More Insights from Speech Act Theory , 1990 .

[58]  A. Meier.  Culture and its effect on speech act performance , 2010 .

[59]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  On dialogue, culture, and organizational learning , 1993 .

[60]  T. Holtgraves.  The production and perception of implicit performatives , 2005 .

[61]  Thomas Holtgraves,et al.  Politeness as universal: Cross-cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use. , 1990 .

[62]  Robert L. Leitheiser,et al.  MIS Skills for the 1990's: A Survey of MIS Managers' Perceptions , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[63]  D. Vanderveken.  Principles of language use , 1990 .

[64]  Steven Hornik,et al.  Communication skills of IS providers: an expectation gap analysis from three stakeholder perspectives , 2003 .

[65]  Daniel D. Ding.  An Indirect Style in Business Communication , 2006 .

[66]  Csr Young,et al.  How to Do Things With Words , 2009 .

[67]  R. Dana.  Multicultural Assessment Perspectives for Professional Psychology , 1992 .

[68]  J. Henderson,et al.  Eye movement control during reading: fixation measures reflect foveal but not parafoveal processing difficulty. , 1993, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[69]  R. Gibbs.  Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests , 1983 .

[70]  Benedikt Szmrecsanyi,et al.  On operationalizing syntactic complexity , 2004 .

[71]  Sherman W. Tyler,et al.  CHAPTER 12 – Prose Comprehension and Memory , 1982 .

[72]  Áurea de Fátima Oliveira,et al.  Organizational culture inventory: adaptation and validation of an instrument for diagnosis in the brazilian context , 2009 .

[73]  S. Shimojo,et al.  Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference , 2006, Vision Research.