What makes cast shadows hard to see?

Visual search is slowed for cast shadows lit from above, as compared to the same search items inverted and so not interpreted as shadows (R. A. Rensink & P. Cavanagh, 2004). The underlying mechanisms for such impaired shadow processing are still not understood. Here we investigated the processing levels at which this shadow-related slowing might operate, by examining its interaction with a range of different phenomena including eye movements, perceptual learning, and stimulus presentation context. The data demonstrated that the shadow mechanism affects the number of saccades during the search rather than the duration until first saccade onset and can be overridden by prolonged training, which then transfers from one type of shadow stimulus to another. Shadow-related slowing did not differ for peripheral and central search items but was reduced when participants searched unilateral displays as compared to bilateral ones. Together our findings suggest that difficulties with perceiving shadows are due to visual processes linked to object recognition, rather than to shadow-specific identification and suppression mechanisms in low-level sensory visual areas. Findings are discussed in the context of the need for the visual system to distinguish between illumination and material.

[1]  D. Todd,et al.  The Sun , 1870, Nature.

[2]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[4]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[5]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Attentional control of early perceptual learning. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search: Fast, enduring, but non-specific , 1995, Vision Research.

[7]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Preemption effects in visual search: evidence for low-level grouping. , 1995, Psychological review.

[8]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  P. Perona,et al.  Preattentive Perception of Elementary Three-dimensional Shapes , 1996, Vision Research.

[10]  C. J. Erkelens,et al.  Control of fixation duration in a simple search task , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  D Kersten,et al.  Moving Cast Shadows Induce Apparent Motion in Depth , 1997, Perception.

[12]  MARISA CARRASCO,et al.  Cortical Magnification Neutralizes the Eccentricity Effect in Visual Search , 1997, Vision Research.

[13]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[14]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  A. Dale,et al.  The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  P. Perona,et al.  Where is the sun? , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  U. Leonards,et al.  Parallel visual search is not always effortless. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[18]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination , 1998, Vision Research.

[19]  Amanda Ellison,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search: Some evidence of specificities , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  D. Knill,et al.  The perception of cast shadows , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  C. Erkelens,et al.  Peripheral vision and oculomotor control during visual search , 1999, Vision Research.

[22]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  An anchoring theory of lightness perception. , 1999, Psychological review.

[23]  B P Allen,et al.  Shadows as Sources of Cues for Distance of Shadow-Casting Objects , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.

[24]  A. Gilchrist,et al.  An anchoring theory of lightness perception. , 1999 .

[25]  Ronald A. Rensink.  The Dynamic Representation of Scenes , 2000 .

[26]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Ruxandra Sireteanu,et al.  Perceptual learning in visual search generalizes over tasks, locations, and eyes , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  M. McCourt,et al.  Pseudoneglect: a review and meta-analysis of performance factors in line bisection tasks , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  H. Wainer,et al.  The Centercept: An Estimable and Meaningful Regression Parameter , 2000, Psychological science.

[30]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  The spread of attention and learning in feature search: effects of target distribution and task difficulty , 2000, Vision Research.

[31]  U. Castiello.  Implicit processing of shadows , 2001, Vision Research.

[32]  R. B. Post,et al.  Contributions of object- and space-based mechanisms to line bisection errors , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  G J Zelinsky,et al.  Eye movements during change detection: Implications for search constraints, memory limitations, and scanning strategies , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[34]  Geoffrey D. Sullivan,et al.  Learning to search for visual targets defined by edges or by shading: Evidence for non-equivalence of line drawings and surface representations , 2001 .

[35]  S. Hochstein,et al.  View from the Top Hierarchies and Reverse Hierarchies in the Visual System , 2002, Neuron.

[36]  M. Nicholls,et al.  Can Free-Viewing Perceptual Asymmetries be Explained by Scanning, Pre-Motor or Attentional Biases? , 2002, Cortex.

[37]  U. Leonards,et al.  Perceptual learning of highly demanding visual search tasks , 2002, Vision Research.

[38]  W. L. Braje.  Illumination encoding in face recognition: effect of position shift. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[39]  I. Mcmanus,et al.  Is Light in Pictures Presumed to Come from the Left Side? , 2004, Perception.

[40]  Geoffrey S. Hubona,et al.  The effects of cast shadows and stereopsis on performing computer-generated spatial tasks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[41]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The Influence of Cast Shadows on Visual Search , 2004, Perception.

[42]  Steffen Werner,et al.  Why Cast Shadows are Expendable: Insensitivity of Human Observers and the Inherent Ambiguity of Cast Shadows in Pictorial Art , 2004, Perception.

[43]  James H Elder,et al.  Rapid Processing of Cast and Attached Shadows , 2004, Perception.

[44]  M. Nicholls,et al.  The nature and contribution of space- and object-based attentional biases to free-viewing perceptual asymmetries , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  M. Ernst,et al.  Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[47]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Impossible Shadows and the Shadow Correspondence Problem , 2004, Perception.

[48]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Perceiving Illumination Inconsistencies in Scenes , 2005, Perception.

[49]  N. Scott-Samuel,et al.  Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans , 2005, Vision Research.

[50]  A. Gilchrist.  Seeing in Black and White , 2006 .

[51]  Wendy J Adams,et al.  A common light-prior for visual search, shape, and reflectance judgments. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[52]  Frederick A.A. Kingdom,et al.  Perceiving light versus material , 2008, Vision Research.

[53]  Tom Troscianko,et al.  Search for gross illumination discrepancies in images of natural objects. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[54]  Bin He,et al.  Mapping the bilateral visual integration by EEG and fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.