A numerical fire simulation approach for effectiveness analysis of fire safety measures in floating liquefied natural gas facilities

Abstract Fire remains a serious threat to a floating liquefied natural gas facility. It is of greater concern given the remote locations and limited accessibility of emergency services. This study aims to present a rigorous procedure to study potential accident scenarios in an offshore (floating processing) facility with different ignition source locations and verify the effectiveness of safety measures using computational fluid dynamics code. The uniqueness of the present study is the integration of release, dispersion and fire modeling scenarios, simplifying the fire analysis and increasing its effectiveness from the offshore process system design and analysis perspectives. The first step of the procedure is to identify the range of potential release scenarios and their strength of dispersion in confined and semi-confined spaces. Subsequently, potential fire scenarios are analyzed considering the influence of the location. Computational fluid dynamics models are used to analyze these three steps of the scenarios. Application of the procedure is demonstrated on an offshore facility by analyzing 14 credible scenarios. The ranges of safety measures of these fires are also studied to determine their effectiveness to prevent fires and mitigate their impact. This study provides a simple and efficient way to analyze the impact of key design parameters. In this study, the transition from fire to explosion is not considered and all the environmental factors are assumed to be constants in the simulation.

[1]  Simo Hostikka,et al.  Experimental Validation of the FDS Simulations of Smoke and Toxic Gas Concentrations , 2007 .

[2]  Maneenapang Bunnag,et al.  FLNG Development: Strategic Approaches to New Growth Challenges , 2011, IPTC 2011.

[3]  Lars Ottemöller,et al.  Seismo‐acoustic analysis of the Buncefield oil depot explosion in the UK, 2005 December 11 , 2008 .

[4]  J. Karwatzki,et al.  Validation of FDS for the prediction of medium-scale pool fires , 2007 .

[5]  Beom-Seon Jang,et al.  Probabilistic fire risk analysis and structural safety assessment of FPSO topside module , 2015 .

[6]  Olav R. Hansen,et al.  CFD-Modeling of LNG Dispersion Experiments , 2007 .

[7]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Modelling the impacts of fire in a typical FLNG processing facility , 2017 .

[8]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Inherent Safety Aspects for Layout Design of a Floating LNG Facility , 2015 .

[9]  Faisal Khan,et al.  An integrated approach for fire and explosion consequence modelling , 2013 .

[10]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Modelling of BP Texas City refinery accident using dynamic risk assessment approach , 2010 .

[11]  Anay Luketa-Hanlin,et al.  A review of large-scale LNG spills: experiments and modeling. , 2005, Journal of hazardous materials.

[12]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Fire impact assessment in FLNG processing facilities using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) , 2017 .

[13]  David W Johnson,et al.  Modeling the release, spreading, and burning of LNG, LPG, and gasoline on water. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[14]  D W Hissong.  Keys to modeling LNG spills on water. , 2007, Journal of hazardous materials.

[15]  Silvio De Angelis,et al.  Detecting hidden volcanic explosions from Mt. Cleveland Volcano, Alaska with infrasound and ground‐coupled airwaves , 2012 .

[16]  Faisal Khan,et al.  An inherently safer layout design for the liquefaction process of an FLNG plant , 2016 .

[17]  En Sup Yoon,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO , 2014 .

[18]  Daniel A. Crowl,et al.  Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications , 2001 .

[19]  J A Fay,et al.  Model of spills and fires from LNG and oil tankers. , 2003, Journal of hazardous materials.

[20]  P. Sammarco,et al.  Distribution and concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons associated with the BP/Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, Gulf of Mexico. , 2013, Marine pollution bulletin.

[21]  Erik Aronsson.  FLNG compared to LNG carriers - Requirements and recommendations for LNG production facilities and re-gas units , 2012 .

[22]  Soo-Young Kim,et al.  Research of design challenges and new technologies for floating LNG , 2014 .

[23]  Cameron G. Ramsay,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment applied to offshore process installations. Challenges after the piper alpha disaster , 1994 .

[24]  J. T. Berg,et al.  A CFD Layout Sensitivity Study to Identify Optimum Safe Design of a FPSO , 2000 .

[25]  Bin Xie,et al.  The Floating Liquefied Natural Gas Production, Storage and Offloading Technology Research , 2014 .

[26]  Robin Pitblado,et al.  Consequences of liquefied natural gas marine incidents , 2005 .

[27]  Vishnu Pareek,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics simulation of LNG pool fire radiation for hazard analysis , 2014 .

[28]  Karen A. Scarfone,et al.  Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security , 2015 .

[29]  Glenn P. Forney,et al.  Fire dynamics simulator- technical reference guide , 2000 .

[30]  James A. Milke.  Analytical Methods for Determining Fire Resistance of Steel Members , 2016 .

[31]  Kevin B. McGrattan,et al.  Fire dynamics simulator technical reference guide volume 1 :: mathematical model , 2013 .

[32]  Patrick Van Hees.  Validation and verification of fire models for fire safety engineering , 2013 .

[33]  OF PRESSURIZED LIQUEFIED GASES : SIMULATIONS OF THE DESERT TORTOISE TEST SERIES WITH THE CFD MODEL FLACS , 2010 .

[34]  Wang Binbin.  Comparative Research on FLUENT and FDS's Numerical Simulation of Smoke Spread in Subway Platform Fire , 2011 .

[35]  He Hua-gang.  The Consequence Analysis of LPG Storage Tank Fire and Explosion , 2008 .

[36]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Domino effect in chemical accidents: main features and accident sequences. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.