Properties of Tumor Spheroid Growth Exhibited by Simple Mathematical Models

Solid tumors, whether in vitro or in vivo, are not an undifferentiated mass of cells. They include necrotic regions, regions of cells that are in a quiescent state (either slowly growing or not growing at all), and regions where cells proliferate rapidly. The decision of a cell to become quiescent or proliferating is thought to depend on both nutrient and oxygen availability and on the presence of tumor necrosis factor, a substance produced by necrotic cells that somehow inhibits the further growth of the tumor. Several different models have been suggested for the basic growth rate of in vitro tumor spheroids, and several different mechanisms are possible by which tumor necrosis factor might halt growth. The models predict the trajectory of growth for a virtual tumor, including proportions of the various components during its time evolution. In this paper we look at a range of hypotheses about basic rates tumor growth and the role of tumor necrotic factor, and determine what possible tumor growth patterns follow from each of twenty-five reasonable models. Proliferating, quiescent and necrotic cells are included, along with tumor necrosis factor as a potential inhibitor of growth in the proliferating pool and two way exchange between the quiescent and proliferating pools. We show that a range of observed qualitative properties of in vitro tumor spheroids at equilibrium are exhibited by one particular simple mathematical model, and discuss implications of this model for tumor growth.

[1]  C. A. Condat,et al.  Modeling tumor cell shedding , 2008, European Biophysics Journal.

[2]  H. Greenspan.  Models for the Growth of a Solid Tumor by Diffusion , 1972 .

[3]  M. Potměšil,et al.  CELL KINETICS OF IRRADIATED EXPERIMENTAL TUMORS: CELL TRANSITION FROM THE NON‐PROLIFERATING TO THE PROLIFERATING POOL , 1980, Cell and tissue kinetics.

[4]  H. Frieboes,et al.  An integrated computational/experimental model of tumor invasion. , 2006, Cancer research.

[5]  D L McElwain,et al.  A re-examination of oxygen diffusion in a spherical cell with Michaelis-Menten oxygen uptake kinetics. , 1978, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  J. Adam.  A mathematical model of tumor growth. III. comparison with experiment , 1987 .

[7]  Michael Berens,et al.  A mathematical model of glioblastoma tumor spheroid invasion in a three-dimensional in vitro experiment. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[8]  D. McElwain,et al.  Apoptosis as a volume loss mechanism in mathematical models of solid tumor growth , 1978 .

[9]  P. Keng,et al.  Isolation of quiescent cells from multicellular tumor spheroids using centrifugal elutriation. , 1982, Cancer research.

[10]  Michael A Henson,et al.  Incorporating energy metabolism into a growth model of multicellular tumor spheroids. , 2006, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  Jelena Pjesivac-Grbovic,et al.  A multiscale model for avascular tumor growth. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[12]  H. Preisler,et al.  Separation of leukemic cells into proliferative and quiescent subpopulations by centrifugal elutriation. , 1977, Cancer research.

[13]  P. Indovina,et al.  Apoptosis, cell adhesion and the extracellular matrix in the three-dimensional growth of multicellular tumor spheroids. , 2000, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[14]  Z Bajzer,et al.  Analysis of growth of multicellular tumour spheroids by mathematical models , 1994, Cell proliferation.

[15]  A. Stein.  A mathematical model of glioblastoma tumor spheroid invasion in a 3d in vitro experiment , 2006 .

[16]  M Scalerandi,et al.  Emergence of taxis and synergy in angiogenesis. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[17]  F. S. Foster,et al.  Ultrasound backscatter microscopy images the internal structure of living tumour spheroids , 1987, Nature.

[18]  J. Adam.  A mathematical model of tumor growth. II. effects of geometry and spatial nonuniformity on stability , 1987 .

[19]  H M Byrne,et al.  Modelling the Role of Angiogenesis and Vasculogenesis in Solid Tumour Growth , 2007, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[20]  J P Freyer,et al.  A model for the growth of multicellular spheroids , 1982, Cell and tissue kinetics.

[21]  P. J. Ponzo,et al.  A model for the growth of a solid tumor with non-uniform oxygen consumption , 1977 .

[22]  P. Hahnfeldt,et al.  Tumor development under angiogenic signaling: a dynamical theory of tumor growth, treatment response, and postvascular dormancy. , 1999, Cancer research.

[23]  L. Kunz-Schughart,et al.  Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. , 2010, Journal of biotechnology.

[24]  Vladimir Mironov,et al.  On the role of endothelial progenitor cells in tumor neovascularization. , 2005, Journal of theoretical biology.

[25]  Sophia Maggelakis,et al.  Mathematical model of prevascular growth of a spherical carcinoma-part II , 1993 .

[26]  G. Webb,et al.  A nonlinear structured population model of tumor growth with quiescence , 1990, Journal of mathematical biology.

[27]  J. Freyer.  Role of necrosis in regulating the growth saturation of multicellular spheroids. , 1988, Cancer research.

[28]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  A model of growth with first-order birth and death rates. , 1985, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[29]  C A Condat,et al.  Cancer growth: predictions of a realistic model. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  E. Demidenko.  The assessment of tumour response to treatment , 2006 .

[31]  M Scalerandi,et al.  Diffusion with evolving sources and competing sinks: development of angiogenesis. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  J. Adam.  A simplified mathematical model of tumor growth , 1986 .

[33]  P. Winsor,et al.  SENSITIVE DEPENDENCE ON THE THRESHOLD FOR TAF SIGNALING IN SOLID TUMORS , 2012 .

[34]  J. Folkman,et al.  SELF-REGULATION OF GROWTH IN THREE DIMENSIONS , 1973, The Journal of experimental medicine.