Multi-RAT mobile node architecture for efficient handover using software defined network

Owing to an increase in mobile devices and the advent of the Internet of Things (IoT), mobile traffic has increased exponentially. Consequently, a wide range of research on handover has been conducted to provide mobile device users with stable network quality. Most research on handover uses a network-dependent method that establishes a new protocol or a method that can refine handover time; however, these methods are difficult to apply because they necessitate network-level changes or they are unable to reduce the fundamental delay that occurs in handover, respectively. This paper suggests a simple and powerful handover scheme based on Multi-Radio Access Technology (Multi-RAT) as well as a method to efficiently use Multi-RAT when handover is not required. This method uses a Multi-RAT terminal equipped with a motion sensor. If a terminal motion exists, the active link and standby link of the mobile node enhance handover performance through data transfer and sensing, respectively. If the node is stationary, its transfer throughput is increased through Carrier Aggregation (CA). In this study, we build a testbed to enable handover based on the aforementioned mechanism and assess the performance of the proposed method through an experiment.

[1]  Nicolas Montavont,et al.  Handover management for mobile nodes in IPv6 networks , 2002, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[2]  Wenhui Zhang,et al.  Handover decision using fuzzy MADM in heterogeneous networks , 2004, 2004 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8733).

[3]  Hui Deng,et al.  HO-RSVP: a protocol providing QoS support for seamless handover between wireless networks , 2006, Q2SWinet '06.

[4]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[5]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobile IPv4 Fast Handovers , 2007, RFC.

[6]  Sergey D. Andreev,et al.  Multi-radio heterogeneous networks: Architectures and performance , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC).

[7]  Olli Alanen,et al.  Handover performance in the IEEE 802.16 mobile networks , 2010, SimuTools.

[8]  Nerea Toledo,et al.  Implementing Layer 2 Network Virtualization Using OpenFlow: Challenges and Solutions , 2012, 2012 European Workshop on Software Defined Networking.

[9]  Sriram Natarajan,et al.  A Software defined Cloud-Gateway automation system using OpenFlow , 2013, 2013 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cloud Networking (CloudNet).

[10]  Telemaco Melia,et al.  An overview of IEEE 802.21: media-independent handover services , 2008, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[11]  Rajeev Koodli Mobile IPv6 Fast Handovers , 2009, RFC.

[12]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  IP Mobility Support for IPv4 , 2002, RFC.

[13]  Sidong Zhang,et al.  An adaptive multi-criteria vertical handover framework for heterogeneous networks , 2008, Mobility '08.

[14]  Marc Emmelmann,et al.  System design and implementation of seamless handover support enabling real-time telemetryhighly mobile users , 2008, MobiWac '08.

[15]  Ruidong Li,et al.  An enhanced fast handover scheme for mobile IPv6 , 2006, IWCMC '06.

[16]  Woo-Jae Kim,et al.  An efficient multi-dimensional handover scheme for next-generation networks , 2008, PM2HW2N '08.