Seismic Demand on Acceleration-Sensitive Nonstructural Components

Nonstructural components should be subjected to a careful and rational seismic design, in order to reduce economic loss and to avoid threats to the life safety, as well as what concerns structural elements. The design of nonstructural components is based on the evaluation of the maximum inertial force, which is related to the floor spectral accelerations. The question arises as to whether the European Building Code, i.e. Eurocode 8, is able to predict actual floor response spectral accelerations occurring in structures designed according to its provisions. A parametric study is therefore conducted on five RC frame structures designed according to Eurocode 8. It shows that Eurocode formulation for the evaluation of the seismic demand on nonstructural components does not well fit the analytical results for a wide range of periods, particularly in the vicinity of the higher mode periods of vibration of the reference structures. The inconsistent approach of current European building codes to the design of nonstructural components is also highlighted. For this reason a parametric study is conducted in order to evaluate the seismic demand on light acceleration-sensitive nonstructural components caused by frequent earthquakes. The above mentioned RC frame structures are therefore subjected to a set of frequent earthquakes, i.e. 63 % probability of exceedance in 50 years. A novel formulation is proposed for an easy implementation in future building codes based on the actual Eurocode provisions.

[1]  Gennaro Magliulo,et al.  Shake table tests for the seismic assessment of hollow brick internal partitions , 2014 .

[2]  M. Fardis,et al.  Designer's guide to EN 1998-1 and en 1998-5 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance; general rules, seismic actions, design rules for buildings, foundations and retaining structures/ M.Fardis[et al.] , 2005 .

[3]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete moment frame buildings , 2006 .

[4]  H. Crowley,et al.  Seismic Hazard Assessment (2003–2009) for the Italian Building Code , 2011 .

[5]  Samit Ray-Chaudhuri,et al.  Effect of Nonlinearity of Frame Buildings on Peak Horizontal Floor Acceleration , 2011 .

[6]  Tatjana Isaković,et al.  Seismic shear force magnification in RC cantilever structural walls, designed according to Eurocode 8 , 2011, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[7]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Floor response spectra in RC frame structures designed according to Eurocode 8 , 2016, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[8]  P. E. Saeed Fathali,et al.  Evaluation of current seismic design equations for nonstructural components in tall buildings using strong motion records , 2011 .

[9]  Ricardo A. Medina,et al.  Floor response spectra for light components mounted on regular moment-resisting frame structures , 2006 .

[10]  Mohsen A. Issa,et al.  Behavior of masonry-infilled nonductile reinforced concrete frames , 2002 .

[11]  Ioannis Politopoulos Floor Spectra of MDOF Nonlinear Structures , 2010 .

[12]  R. Medina,et al.  Acceleration response modification factors for nonstructural components attached to inelastic moment‐resisting frame structures , 2007 .

[13]  Gaetano Manfredi,et al.  Seismic demand on light acceleration‐sensitive nonstructural components in European reinforced concrete buildings , 2015 .

[14]  Mahendra P. Singh,et al.  Seismic Design Forces. II: Flexible Nonstructural Components , 2006 .

[15]  Giuseppe Maddaloni,et al.  Effect of the Seismic Input on Non-Linear Response of R/C Building Structures , 2012 .

[16]  Arash E. Zaghi,et al.  Floor Accelerations in Yielding Special Moment Resisting Frame Structures , 2013 .

[17]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[18]  A W Beeby,et al.  CONCISE EUROCODE FOR THE DESIGN OF CONCRETE BUILDINGS. BASED ON BSI PUBLICATION DD ENV 1992-1-1: 1992. EUROCODE 2: DESIGN OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES. PART 1: GENERAL RULES AND RULES FOR BUILDINGS , 1993 .

[19]  Mahendra P. Singh,et al.  Seismic Design Forces. I: Rigid Nonstructural Components , 2006 .

[20]  J. Douglas,et al.  Internet site for European strong-motion data , 2004 .

[21]  Curt B. Haselton,et al.  Seismic Collapse Safety and Behavior of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Buildings , 2007 .

[22]  José I. Restrepo,et al.  Earthquake‐induced floor horizontal accelerations in buildings , 2002 .

[23]  Roberto Villaverde,et al.  Effect of Building Nonlinearity on Seismic Response of Nonstructural Components: A Parametric Study , 2008 .

[24]  Luis Ibarra,et al.  Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration , 2005 .