Serum tumor markers in breast cancer: are they of clinical value?

BACKGROUND Although multiple serum-based tumor markers have been described for breast cancer, such as CA 15-3, BR 27.29 (CA27.29), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide antigen, tissue polypeptide specific antigen, and HER-2 (the extracellular domain), the most widely used are CA 15-3 and CEA. METHODS The literature relevant to serum tumor markers in breast cancer was reviewed. Particular attention was given to systematic reviews, prospective randomized trials, and guidelines issued by expert panels. RESULTS Because of a lack of sensitivity for early disease and lack of specificity, none of the available markers is of value for the detection of early breast cancer. High preoperative concentrations of CA 15-3 are, however, associated with adverse patient outcome. Although serial determinations of tumor markers after primary treatment for breast cancer can preclinically detect recurrent/metastatic disease with lead times of approximately 2-9 months, the clinical value of this lead time remains to be determined. Serum markers, however, are the only validated approach for monitoring treatment in patients with advanced disease that cannot be evaluated by use of conventional criteria. CONCLUSIONS CA 15-3 is one of the first circulating prognostic factors for breast cancer. Preoperative concentrations thus might be combined with existing prognostic factors for predicting outcome in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. At present, the most important clinical application of CA 15-3 is in monitoring therapy in patients with advanced breast cancer that is not assessable by existing clinical or radiologic procedures.

[1]  J. Bergh,et al.  ESMO Minimum Clinical Recommendations for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up of primary breast cancer. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[2]  B De La Lande,et al.  Prognostic value of CA 15.3 kinetics for metastatic breast cancer. , 2002, The International journal of biological markers.

[3]  K. Cheung,et al.  Tumour marker measurements in the diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancer. , 2000, Cancer treatment reviews.

[4]  M. Untch,et al.  Serum CEA and CA 15-3 as prognostic factors in primary breast cancer , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  M. Indelli,et al.  Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. The GIVIO Investigators. , 1994, JAMA.

[6]  R. Molina,et al.  Prospective evaluation of CEA and CA 15.3 in patients with locoregional breast cancer. , 2003, Anticancer research.

[7]  M. Duffy,et al.  Preoperative CA 15‐3 concentrations predict outcome of patients with breast carcinoma , 1998, Cancer.

[8]  A. Nicolini,et al.  Prolonged survival by 'early' salvage treatment of breast cancer patients: a retrospective 6-year study. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  M. Duffy,et al.  CA 15-3 and Related Mucins as Circulating Markers in Breast Cancer , 1999, Annals of clinical biochemistry.

[10]  C. Parker Active surveillance: towards a new paradigm in the management of early prostate cancer. , 2004, The Lancet. Oncology.

[11]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive diagnostic follow-up after treatment of primary breast cancer. A randomized trial. National Research Council Project on Breast Cancer follow-up. , 1994, JAMA.

[12]  A. Howell,et al.  Objective measurement of therapeutic response in breast cancer using tumour markers. , 1991, British Journal of Cancer.

[13]  A. Nicolini,et al.  Postoperative Follow-Up of Breast Cancer Patients: Overview and Progress in the Use of Tumor Markers , 2000, Tumor Biology.

[14]  Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer. Adopted on May 17, 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  A. Symeonidis,et al.  Increased Serum CA-15.3 Levels in Patients with Megaloblastic Anemia due to Vitamin B12 Deficiency , 2005, Oncology.

[16]  I. Ellis,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. , 1999, Critical reviews in oncology/hematology.

[17]  M. Duffy,et al.  High preoperative CA 15-3 concentrations predict adverse outcome in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer: study of 600 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer. , 2004, Clinical chemistry.

[18]  D. Kiang,et al.  Tumor marker kinetics in the monitoring of breast cancer , 1990, Cancer.

[19]  A. Cuschieri,et al.  Potential use of tumour marker CA 15-3 in the staging and prognosis of patients with breast cancer. , 1991, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[20]  G. Rustin,et al.  Use of CA-125 to assess response to new agents in ovarian cancer trials. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  Á. Ruibal,et al.  Circulating tumor marker levels in advanced breast carcinoma correlate with the extent of metastatic disease , 1989, Cancer.

[22]  B. Hancock,et al.  Gestational trophoblastic diseases and their treatment. , 1997, Cancer treatment reviews.

[23]  R. Neumann,et al.  Monitoring of Serum Her-2/neu Predicts Response and Progression-Free Survival to Trastuzumab-Based Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2004, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  Á. Ruibal,et al.  Circulating CA 15-3 levels in the postsurgical follow-up of breast cancer patients and in non-malignant diseases , 1989, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  R. Molina,et al.  c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, CEA, and CA 15.3 in patients with breast cancer: prognostic value , 1998, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[26]  C. Vogel,et al.  Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy: convincing survival benefit or not? , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[27]  D. Dodwell,et al.  Follow-up care of patients treated for breast cancer: a structured review. , 2004, Cancer treatment reviews.

[28]  A. Vassou,et al.  The neutrophil, not the tumor , 2004, Cancer.

[29]  C. Isaacs,et al.  New prognostic factors for breast cancer recurrence. , 2001, Seminars in oncology.

[30]  M. Williams,et al.  An objective biochemical assessment of therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer: a study with external review of clinical data. , 1990, British Journal of Cancer.

[31]  R. Neumann,et al.  Potential clinical utility of serum HER-2/neu oncoprotein concentrations in patients with breast cancer. , 2003, Clinical chemistry.

[32]  F. Caponigro,et al.  Impact of Preoperative CA 15-3 Levels in Operable Breast Cancer. Comparison with Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA) and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) , 1991, The International journal of biological markers.

[33]  E. Diamandis,et al.  Tumor Markers: Physiology, Pathobiology, Technology, and Clinical Applications , 2002 .

[34]  R. Blamey,et al.  Continuous chemotherapy in responsive metastatic breast cancer: a role for tumour markers? , 1993, British Journal of Cancer.

[35]  P. Dombernowsky,et al.  Interpretation of results for tumor markers on the basis of analytical imprecision and biological variation. , 1993, Clinical chemistry.

[36]  H. Grimes,et al.  The Prognostic Value of the Tumor Marker CA 15–3 at Initial Diagnosis of Patients with Breast Cancer , 2000, The International journal of biological markers.

[37]  R. Motzer,et al.  Testicular germ-cell cancer. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[38]  C. Sturgeon,et al.  Treatment response in metastatic breast cancer. A multicentre study comparing UICC criteria and tumour marker changes , 1996 .

[39]  M. de las Heras,et al.  Preoperative values of CA 15-3 and CEA as prognostic factors in breast cancer: a multivariate analysis. , 2001, Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine.

[40]  N. Dalay,et al.  Utility of CA 15-3 and CEA in monitoring breast cancer patients with bone metastases: special emphasis on "spiking" phenomena. , 1997, Clinical biochemistry.

[41]  A. Liberati,et al.  Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[42]  Farooq Ghani,et al.  Clinical utility of serum HER2/neu in monitoring and prediction of progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab-based therapies , 2004, Breast Cancer Research.

[43]  R. Bast,et al.  2000 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer: clinical practice guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  G. Mariani New developments in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: from chemotherapy to biological therapy. , 2005, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[45]  R. Blamey Guidelines on endocrine therapy of breast cancer EUSOMA. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[46]  A. Howell,et al.  The objective measurement of remission and progression in metastatic breast cancer by use of serum tumour markers. European Group for Serum Tumour Markers in Breast Cancer. , 1999, European Journal of Cancer.

[47]  D. Seligson,et al.  Clinical Chemistry , 1965, Bulletin de la Societe de chimie biologique.

[48]  Martín Velasco,et al.  Use of serial carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 15.3 assays in detecting relapses in breast cancer patients , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[49]  L. Dogliotti,et al.  Relationship between CA 15-3 serum levels and disease extent in predicting overall survival of breast cancer patients with newly diagnosed metastatic disease. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.

[50]  R. Gelber,et al.  Routine tests during follow-up of patients after primary treatment for operable breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG) , 1995, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[51]  M. Kurosumi,et al.  Significance of serum tumor markers in monitoring advanced breast cancer patients treated with systemic therapy: A prospective study , 2004, Breast cancer.

[52]  M. Duffy,et al.  Predictive markers in breast and other cancers: a review. , 2005, Clinical chemistry.

[53]  J. Geraghty,et al.  CA 15‐3 in patients with locoregional and metastatic breast carcinoma , 1992, Cancer.

[54]  A. Nicolini,et al.  "Tumour marker guided" salvage treatment prolongs survival of breast cancer patients: final report of a 7-year study. , 2003, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[55]  L. Emens,et al.  The follow-up of breast cancer. , 2003, Seminars in oncology.

[56]  M. Duffy Urokinase Plasminogen Activator and Its Inhibitor, Pai-1, as Prognostic Markers in Breast Cancer: from Pilot to Level 1 Evidence Studies , 2002 .

[57]  A. Paccagnella,et al.  Prognostic role of serum CA15.3 in 362 node-negative breast cancers. An old player for a new game. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[58]  S. Ciatto,et al.  Intensive Diagnostic Follow-up After Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer: A Randomized Trial , 1994 .

[59]  F. Matsubara,et al.  Changes in the tumor marker concentration in female patients with hyper-, eu-, and hypothyroidism. , 1989, Endocrinologia japonica.

[60]  E. Kumpulainen,et al.  Serum Tumor Marker CA 15.3 and Stage are the Two Most Powerful Predictors of Survival in Primary Breast Cancer , 2002, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[61]  E. B. Polevaia,et al.  [Tumor markers in breast cancer]. , 1985, Sovetskaia meditsina.

[62]  M. Duffy,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen as a marker for colorectal cancer: is it clinically useful? , 2001, Clinical chemistry.

[63]  O. Merimsky,et al.  Treatment of disease-negative but mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen-positive breast cancer patients with tamoxifen: preliminary results of a prospective controlled randomized trial , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[64]  M. Duffy,et al.  Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer – European Group on Tumor Markers Recommendations , 2005, Tumor Biology.

[65]  A. Liberati,et al.  Follow-up strategies for women treated for early breast cancer. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[66]  D. Kufe,et al.  Human MUC1 carcinoma-associated protein confers resistance to genotoxic anticancer agents. , 2004, Cancer cell.

[67]  K. Holli,et al.  Ca 15-3 in the follow-up of localised breast cancer: a prospective study. , 2002, European journal of cancer.

[68]  R. Rubens,et al.  Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. , 1977, British Journal of Cancer.