Approaches to Data Sharing: An Analysis of NSF Data Management Plans from a Large Research University

INTRODUCTION Sharing digital research data is increasingly common, propelled by funding requirements, journal publishers, local campus policies, or community-driven expectations of more collaborative and interdisciplinary research environments. However, it is not well understood how researchers are addressing these expectations and whether they are transitioning from individualized practices to more thoughtful and potentially public approaches to data sharing that will enable reuse of their data. METHODS The University of Minnesota Libraries conducted a local opt-in study of data management plans (DMPs) included in funded National Science Foundation (NSF) grant proposals from January 2011 through June 2014. In order to understand the current data management and sharing practices of campus researchers, we solicited, coded, and analyzed 182 DMPs, accounting for 41% of the total number of plans available. RESULTS DMPs from seven colleges and academic units were included. The College of Science of Engineering accounted for 70% of the plans in our review. While 96% of DMPs mentioned data sharing, we found a variety of approaches for how PIs shared their data, where data was shared, the intended audiences for sharing, and practices for ensuring long-term reuse. CONCLUSION DMPs are useful tools to investigate researchers’ current plans and philosophies for how research outputs might be shared. Plans and strategies for data sharing are inconsistent across this sample, and researchers need to better understand what kind of sharing constitutes public access. More intervention is needed to ensure that researchers implement the sharing provisions in their plans to the fullest extent possible. These findings will help academic libraries develop practical, targeted data services for researchers that aim to increase the impact of institutional research. External Data or Supplements: Bishoff, Carolyn; Johnston, Lisa, 2015, “Instrument used to code DMPs”, http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/5JGNMM , Harvard Dataverse. [Instrument] Johnston, Lisa R; Bishoff, Carolyn; McGrory, John; Storino, Chris; Swendsrud, Anders. (2015). Analyzed Data Management Plans (DMPs) from Successful University of Minnesota Grants from the National Science Foundation, 2011-2014 [dataset]. Retrieved from the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, http://dx.doi.org/10.13020/D6TG6Z [Data]

[1]  Susan Wells Parham,et al.  NSF DMP content analysis: What are researchers saying? , 2012 .

[2]  William H. Mischo,et al.  An Analysis of Data Management Plans in University of Illinois National Science Foundation Grant Proposals , 2014 .

[3]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Who Shares? Who Doesn't? Factors Associated with Openly Archiving Raw Research Data , 2011, PloS one.

[4]  A. Swan,et al.  To share or not to share: Publication and quality assurance of research data outputs. A report commissioned by the Research Information Network , 2008 .

[5]  Renata Gonçalves Curty,et al.  What have Scientists Planned for Data Sharing and Reuse? A Content Analysis of NSF Awardees’ Data Management Plans , 2013 .

[6]  Barbara Aronson,et al.  Improving online access to medical information for low-income countries. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The conundrum of sharing research data , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Andrew Wesolek,et al.  The NSF/NIH Effect: Surveying the Effect of Data Management Requirements on Faculty, Sponsored Programs, and Institutional Repositories , 2014 .

[9]  A. Vickers,et al.  Empirical Study of Data Sharing by Authors Publishing in PLoS Journals , 2009, PloS one.

[10]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[11]  Michael Witt,et al.  Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[12]  Susan Wells Parham,et al.  The DART Project: using data management plans as a research tool , 2015 .

[13]  Lisa R Johnston,et al.  Analyzed Data Management Plans (DMPs) from Successful University of Minnesota Grants from the National Science Foundation, 2011-2014 , 2015 .

[14]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Promoting Access to Public Research Data for Scientific, Economic, and Social Development , 2004, Data Sci. J..

[15]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  Katherine G. Akers,et al.  Disciplinary differences in faculty research data management practices and perspectives , 2013, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[17]  Sam Yeaman,et al.  Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[18]  Susan Wells Parham,et al.  Development of an analytic rubric to facilitate and standardize the review of NSF data management plans , 2015 .