Specific Features of After-School Program Quality: Associations with Children’s Functioning in Middle Childhood

This longitudinal study examined associations between three after-school program quality features (positive staff–child relations, available activities, programming flexibility) and child developmental outcomes (reading and math grades, work habits, and social skills with peers) in Grade 2 and then Grade 3. Participants (n = 120 in Grade 2, n = 91 in Grade 3) attended after-school programs more than 4 days per week, on average. Controlling for child and family background factors and children’s prior functioning on the developmental outcomes, positive staff–child relations in the programs were positively associated with children’s reading grades in both Grades 2 and 3, and math grades in Grade 2. Positive staff–child relations also were positively associated with social skills in Grade 2, for boys only. The availability of a diverse array of age-appropriate activities at the programs was positively associated with children’s math grades and classroom work habits in Grade 3. Programming flexibility (child choice of activities) was not associated with child outcomes.

[1]  K. Dodge,et al.  Multiple sources of data on social behavior and social status in the school: a cross-age comparison. , 1988, Child development.

[2]  William Damon,et al.  Child Development Today and Tomorrow , 1988 .

[3]  D. Baumrind,et al.  Rearing competent children. , 1989 .

[4]  R. Vasta,et al.  Six Theories of Child Development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues , 1992 .

[5]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[6]  D. Vandell,et al.  Low-income children's after-school care: are there beneficial effects of after-school programs? , 1994, Child development.

[7]  G. Bohlin,et al.  Day care quality, family and child characteristics and socioemotional development , 1995 .

[8]  D. Vandell,et al.  Quality of care at school-aged child-care programs: regulatable features, observed experiences, child perspectives, and parent perspectives. , 1996, Child development.

[9]  T. Harms.  School-Age Care Environment Rating Scale. , 1996 .

[10]  G. S. Pettit,et al.  Patterns of After-School Care in Middle Childhood: Risk Factors and Developmental Outcomes. , 1997 .

[11]  E. Peisner-Feinberg,et al.  Relations between Preschool Children's Child-Care Experiences and Concurrent Development: The Cost, Quality, and Outcomes Study. , 1997 .

[12]  K. Mccartney,et al.  After-School Time and Children's Behavioral Adjustment. , 1997 .

[13]  D. Vandell,et al.  Harsh, Firm, and Permissive Parenting in Low-Income Families , 1998 .

[14]  Robin Peth-Pierce.  The NICHD Study of Early Child Care. , 1998 .

[15]  G. Ladd,et al.  Children's social and scholastic lives in kindergarten: related spheres of influence? , 1999, Child development.

[16]  J. Reeve,et al.  Autonomy-Supportive Teachers: How They Teach and Motivate Students , 1999 .

[17]  D. Vandell,et al.  Experiences in after-school programs and children's adjustment in first-grade classrooms. , 1999, Child development.

[18]  Yuk Fai Cheong,et al.  HLM 6: Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling , 2000 .

[19]  M. Burchinal,et al.  Family selection and child care experiences: implications for studies of child outcomes , 2000 .

[20]  K. Moore,et al.  MENTORING PROGRAMS AND YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: A SYNTHESIS , 2002 .

[21]  Megan K. Beckett,et al.  Accountability for After-School Care: Devising Standards and Measuring Adherence to Them , 2002 .

[22]  A. Assor,et al.  Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. , 2002, The British journal of educational psychology.

[23]  S. Jurs,et al.  Evaluations of After-School Programs: A Meta-Evaluation of Methodologies and Narrative Synthesis of Findings , 2002 .

[24]  Evaluations of After-School Programs: A Meta-Evaluation of Methodologies and Narrative Synthesis of Findings , 2002 .

[25]  H. Stattin,et al.  Structured after‐school activities as a moderator of depressed mood for adolescents with detached relations to their parents , 2002 .

[26]  R. Raley,et al.  Multiple Choices after School: Findings from the Extended-Service Schools Initiative. , 2002 .

[27]  R. Houts,et al.  Social functioning in first grade: associations with earlier home and child care predictors and with current classroom experiences. , 2003, Child development.

[28]  R. Pianta,et al.  Teacher-Child Relationships and Children's Success in the First Years of School , 2004 .

[29]  E. Reisner,et al.  Building Quality, Scale, and Effectiveness in After-School Programs: Summary Report of the TASC Evaluation. , 2004 .

[30]  Mary Jo Nolin,et al.  Before- and After-School Care, Programs, and Activities of Children in Kindergarten through Eighth Grade: 2001. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2004-008. , 2004 .

[31]  Robert C. Pianta,et al.  Are child developmental outcomes related to before- and after-school care arrangements? Results from the NICHD study of early child care. , 2004, Child development.

[32]  P. Simon.  Community Programs to Promote Youth Development , 2005 .

[33]  Jacquelynne S. Eccles,et al.  Organized activities as contexts of development : extracurricular activities, after-school, and community programs , 2005 .

[34]  D. Gottfredson,et al.  After-school programs, antisocial behavior, and positive youth development: An exploration of the relationship between program implementation and changes in youth behavior. , 2005 .

[35]  Bonnie Knoke,et al.  A Day in Third Grade: A Large‐Scale Study of Classroom Quality and Teacher and Student Behavior , 2005, The Elementary School Journal.

[36]  Mark Dynarski,et al.  When Schools Stay Open Late: The National Evaluation of the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers Program, First Year Findings , 2005 .

[37]  After-school programs for low-income children: Differences in program quality. , 2005 .

[38]  J. L. Mahoney,et al.  An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. , 2005, Child development.

[39]  R. Mccall,et al.  Evidence-Based Practices and Programs for Early Childhood Care and Education. , 2006 .

[40]  N. Riggs.  After‐school program attendance and the social development of rural latino children of immigrant families , 2006 .

[41]  I. Iruka,et al.  National Household Education Surveys Program of 2005 After-School Programs and Activities: 2005. E.D. TAB. NCES 2006-076. , 2006 .

[42]  Celia A. Brownell,et al.  Child-care effect sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[43]  J. Grossman,et al.  Quality Time after School: What Instructors Can Do To Enhance Learning. , 2007 .

[44]  Joseph A. Durlak,et al.  The Impact of After-School Programs that Promote Personal and Social Skills. , 2007 .

[45]  Robert C. Pianta,et al.  Opportunities to Learn in America's Elementary Classrooms , 2007, Science.

[46]  J. L. Mahoney,et al.  After‐School Program Engagement: Links to Child Competence and Program Quality and Content , 2007, The Elementary School Journal.

[47]  J. L. Mahoney,et al.  Neighborhood crime and self-care: risks for aggression and lower academic performance. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[48]  R. Houts,et al.  Mothers' and fathers' support for child autonomy and early school achievement. , 2008, Developmental psychology.