Analysis of formant frequencies in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancers treated by glossectomy.

AIMS To compare voice quality as defined by formant analysis using a sustained vowel in patients who have undergone a partial glossectomy with a group of normal subjects. METHODS & PROCEDURES The design consisted of a single centre, cross-sectional cohort study. The setting was an Adult Tertiary Referral Unit. A total of 26 patients (19 males) who underwent partial glossectomy and 31 normal volunteers (18 males) participated in the study. Group comparisons using the first three formant frequencies (F1, F2 and F3) using linear predictive coding (Laryngograph Ltd, London, UK) were performed. The existence of any significant difference of F1, F2 and F3 between the two groups using the sustained vowel /i/ and the effects of other factors, namely age, first presentation versus recurrence, site (oral cavity, oropharynx), subsite (anterior two-thirds of the tongue, tongue base), stage, radiation, complication, and neck dissection, were analysed. OUTCOMES & RESULTS Formant frequencies F1, F2 and F3 were normally distributed. F1 and F2 were significantly different in normal males versus females. F1, F2 and F3 were not different statistically between male and female glossectomees. Comparison of only women showed significant differences between normal subjects and patients in F2 and F3, but none in F1. This was the opposite in men where F1 was significantly different. Age, tumour presentation, site, subsite, radiation and neck dissection showed no significant difference. Postoperative complications significantly affected the F1 formant frequency. CONCLUSIONS The study found that the formant values in patients following a partial glossectomy were altered significantly as compared with the normal control subjects. Only gender and complications and not the age, site, subsite, radiation and neck dissection were seen to influence the formant scores.

[1]  J. Pukander,et al.  Speech articulation after subtotal glossectomy and reconstruction with a myocutaneous flap. , 1999, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  M. B. Mann,et al.  The effects of glossectomy on intelligibility of speech and oral perceptual discrimination. , 1980, Journal of oral surgery.

[3]  Nabil Samman,et al.  Acoustic analysis of vowels following glossectomy , 2006, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[4]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Analysis of the articulation after glossectomy. , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[5]  H B Fisher,et al.  Compensatory articulation patterns of a surgically treated oral cancer patient. , 1982, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[6]  D. Childers,et al.  A critical review of electroglottography. , 1985, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[7]  K. Stevens,et al.  Development of a Quantitative Description of Vowel Articulation , 1955 .

[8]  A. Bradlow,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Rentschler Gj,et al.  The effects of glossectomy on intelligibility of speech and oral perceptual discrimination. , 1980 .

[10]  S. Hamlet,et al.  A longitudinal study of vowel production in partial glossectomy patients , 1992 .

[11]  Peter Rhys-Evans,et al.  Assessment of the formant frequencies in normal and laryngectomized individuals using linear predictive coding. , 2007, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[12]  L. H. Anauer,et al.  Speech Analysis and Synthesis by Linear Prediction of the Speech Wave , 2000 .

[13]  J. Sciubba,et al.  Speech patterns following partial glossectomy for small tumors of the tongue , 1991, Head & neck.