The impact of manual threshold selection in medical additive manufacturing

PurposeMedical additive manufacturing requires standard tessellation language (STL) models. Such models are commonly derived from computed tomography (CT) images using thresholding. Threshold selection can be performed manually or automatically. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of manual and default threshold selection on the reliability and accuracy of skull STL models using different CT technologies.MethodOne female and one male human cadaver head were imaged using multi-detector row CT, dual-energy CT, and two cone-beam CT scanners. Four medical engineers manually thresholded the bony structures on all CT images. The lowest and highest selected mean threshold values and the default threshold value were used to generate skull STL models. Geometric variations between all manually thresholded STL models were calculated. Furthermore, in order to calculate the accuracy of the manually and default thresholded STL models, all STL models were superimposed on an optical scan of the dry female and male skulls (“gold standard”).ResultsThe intra- and inter-observer variability of the manual threshold selection was good (intra-class correlation coefficients >0.9). All engineers selected grey values closer to soft tissue to compensate for bone voids. Geometric variations between the manually thresholded STL models were 0.13 mm (multi-detector row CT), 0.59 mm (dual-energy CT), and 0.55 mm (cone-beam CT). All STL models demonstrated inaccuracies ranging from −0.8 to +1.1 mm (multi-detector row CT), −0.7 to +2.0 mm (dual-energy CT), and −2.3 to +4.8 mm (cone-beam CT).ConclusionsThis study demonstrates that manual threshold selection results in better STL models than default thresholding. The use of dual-energy CT and cone-beam CT technology in its present form does not deliver reliable or accurate STL models for medical additive manufacturing. New approaches are required that are based on pattern recognition and machine learning algorithms.

[1]  H. Bosmans,et al.  Variability of dental cone beam CT grey values for density estimations. , 2013, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  F. Rybicki,et al.  Medical 3D Printing for the Radiologist. , 2015, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[3]  G. Ambrosano,et al.  Bone density: comparative evaluation of Hounsfield units in multislice and cone-beam computed tomography. , 2012, Brazilian oral research.

[4]  M. Endo,et al.  Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. , 2001, Medical physics.

[5]  A. Mäkitie,et al.  Inaccuracies in additive manufactured medical skull models caused by the DICOM to STL conversion process. , 2014, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[6]  Gengsheng Lawrence Zeng,et al.  Cone Beam Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Using Two Orbits , 1991, IPMI.

[7]  Erin J Smith,et al.  Using additive manufacturing in accuracy evaluation of reconstructions from computed tomography , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  P.K Sahoo,et al.  A survey of thresholding techniques , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[9]  C. Munsteren,et al.  Fix for Life. The Development of a New Embalming Method to Preserve Life‐like Morphology , 2015 .

[10]  Pierre Boulanger,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of Cone Beam Computerized Tomography (CBCT): medical imaging technology in head and neck reconstruction , 2013, Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery.

[11]  H. Tuy AN INVERSION FORMULA FOR CONE-BEAM RECONSTRUCTION* , 1983 .

[12]  Jos Vander Sloten,et al.  Segmentation accuracy of long bones. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Beat Schmutz,et al.  Effects of CT image segmentation methods on the accuracy of long bone 3D reconstructions. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[14]  W. McDavid,et al.  Deriving Hounsfield units using grey levels in cone beam CT: a clinical application. , 2012, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[15]  Daniel Danielsson,et al.  Rapid prototyped patient specific implants for reconstruction of orbital wall defects. , 2014, Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.

[16]  J. Bartko Corrective Note to: “The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as a Measure of Reliability” , 1974 .

[17]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Segmentation of Trabecular Jaw Bone on Cone Beam CT Datasets. , 2015, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[18]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. , 2015, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[19]  Ian Gibson,et al.  Additive manufacturing technologies : 3D printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing , 2015 .

[20]  Akitoshi Katsumata,et al.  Effects of image artifacts on gray-value density in limited-volume cone-beam computerized tomography. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[21]  Adel Abou-ElFetouh,et al.  Computer‐guided rapid‐prototyped templates for segmental mandibular osteotomies: a preliminary report , 2011, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[22]  F. Maes,et al.  Analysis of intensity variability in multislice and cone beam computed tomography. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[23]  Mika Salmi,et al.  Imaging requirements for medical applications of additive manufacturing , 2014, Acta radiologica.

[24]  Tong Xi,et al.  A Novel Region-Growing Based Semi-Automatic Segmentation Protocol for Three-Dimensional Condylar Reconstruction Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  T. Johnson,et al.  Dual-energy CT: general principles. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  N Telmon,et al.  Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT. , 2012, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[27]  Tahmineh Razi,et al.  Relationship between Hounsfield Unit in CT Scan and Gray Scale in CBCT , 2014, Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects.

[28]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .