Point-Counterpoint: The Automated Clinical Microbiology Laboratory: Fact or Fantasy?

ABSTRACT Automated chemistry laboratories dependent on robotic processes are the standard in both academic and large community hospital settings. Diagnostic microbiology manufacturers are betting that robotics will be used for specimen processing, plate reading, and organism identification in the near future. These systems are highly complex and have large footprints and hefty price tags. However, they are touted as being more efficient, rapid, and accurate than standard processes. Certain features, such as image collection, are highly innovative. Hospital administrators may be swayed to institute these new systems because of the promise of the need for fewer skilled workers, higher throughput, and greater efficiency. They also may be swayed by the fact that workers with the requisite clinical microbiology skills are becoming more difficult to find, and this technology should allow fewer skilled workers to handle larger numbers of cultures. In this Point-Counterpoint, Nate Ledeboer, Medical Director, Clinical Microbiology and Molecular Diagnostics, Dynacare Laboratories, and Froedtert Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, will explain why he believes that this approach will become widespread, while Steve Dallas of the University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio explains why he thinks that this automation may not become widely used.

[1]  J. Wain,et al.  Revolutionising Bacteriology to Improve Treatment Outcomes and Antibiotic Stewardship , 2013, Infection & chemotherapy.

[2]  Gilbert Greub,et al.  Automation in the clinical microbiology laboratory. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[3]  P. Fisher,et al.  The American Society for Clinical Pathology's 2014 vacancy survey of medical laboratories in the United States. , 2015, American journal of clinical pathology.

[4]  K. Wood,et al.  Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock* , 2006, Critical care medicine.

[5]  Jonathan Northover,et al.  Healthcare in the cloud: the opportunity and the challenge. , 2014, MLO: medical laboratory observer.

[6]  J. Rello,et al.  The value of routine microbial investigation in ventilator-associated pneumonia. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[7]  G Greub,et al.  Automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose? , 2011, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[8]  S. Hofer,et al.  First Evaluation of Automated Specimen Inoculation for Wound Swab Samples by Use of the Previ Isola System Compared to Manual Inoculation in a Routine Laboratory: Finding a Cost-Effective and Accurate Approach , 2012, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  J. Barenfanger,et al.  Decreased mortality associated with prompt Gram staining of blood cultures. , 2008, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  G. Woods Automation in clinical microbiology. , 1992, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Policy statement on consolidation of clinical microbiology laboratories. , 2001, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[12]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines , 1999, BMJ.

[13]  P. Bourbeau,et al.  First Evaluation of the WASP, a New Automated Microbiology Plating Instrument , 2009, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[14]  P. Gilligan Impact of Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory , 2004, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[15]  P. Jenks,et al.  Comparison of Automated Processing of Flocked Swabs with Manual Processing of Fiber Swabs for Detection of Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  D. Goff Antimicrobial stewardship: bridging the gap between quality care and cost , 2011, Current opinion in infectious diseases.

[17]  T. Stijnen,et al.  Rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing reduce antibiotic use and accelerate pathogen-directed antibiotic use. , 2007, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.