Advanced Propellants for Space Propulsion - A Task within the DLR Interdisciplinary Project "Future Fuels"

Within the sub-project "Advanced Rocket Propellants" (TP5) of the DLR interdisciplinary project "Future Fuels" three promising advanced green propellant systems are under investigation with regard to applicability and efficiency in rocket engines. The work aims at different mission scenarios and tasks, whereas performance, low costs, environmental friendliness, and safe handling characteristics are essential. The objective of this sub-project is to show and elaborate the potential of these propellant systems, to develop and to understand combustor processes with the task to advance the technology development in direction to commercial development and usage and to provide this technology to industry. This paper gives an overview of the planned work together with first obtained results.

[1]  Stefan May,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of a High Test Peroxide Catalyst Chamber for a Hybrid Rocket Engine , 2013 .

[2]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  A premixed Green Propellant consisting of N2O and C2H4: Experimental analysis of quenching diameters to design flashback arresters , 2018 .

[3]  U. Riedel,et al.  Ethane / Nitrous Oxide Mixtures as a Green Propellant to Substitute Hydrazine : Validation of Reaction Mechanism , 2019 .

[4]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Combustion of Gelled Propellants Containing Microsized and Nanosized Aluminum Particles , 2015 .

[5]  Marina Braun-Unkhoff,et al.  Ethene / Dinitrogen Oxide - A Green Propellant to substitute Hydrazine: Investigation on its Ignition Delay Time and Laminar Flame Speed , 2017 .

[6]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Experimental Performance Analysis (c* & c* efficiency) of a Premixed Green Propellant consisting of N2O and C2H4 , 2017 .

[7]  Keiichi Hori Lessons Learned in the Thruster Tests of HAN , 2017 .

[8]  Jean-Philippe Dutheil,et al.  Highly reusable LOx / LCH 4 ACE rocket engine designed for SpacePlane : Technical Maturation progress via key system demonstrators results , 2017 .

[9]  Christoph Kirchberger,et al.  Overview on the German Gel Propulsion Technology Activities: Status 2017 and Outlook , 2017 .

[10]  Ronald A. Spores,et al.  GPIM AF-M315E Propulsion System , 2015 .

[11]  D. M. Deffenbaugh,et al.  A Comparison of Five ISPP Systems for a Mars Sample Return Mission , 1999 .

[12]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Hot firing of a N2O/C2H4 premixed green propellant: First combustion tests and results , 2016 .

[13]  Ulrich Gotzig,et al.  Development and test of a 3D printed hydrogen peroxide flight control thruster , 2015 .

[14]  Marius Wilhelm,et al.  New technologies for ammonium dinitramide based monopropellant thrusters – The project RHEFORM , 2018 .

[15]  Simone Ehrenberger,et al.  Future Fuels—Analyses of the Future Prospects of Renewable Synthetic Fuels , 2019, Energies.

[16]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Influence of combustion chamber size (L*) on characteristic exhaust velocity (c*) for a N2O/C2H4 premixed green propellant , 2018 .

[17]  Kjell Anflo,et al.  Green space propulsion: Opportunities and prospects , 2014 .

[18]  Dominic Freudenmann,et al.  A Method for Screening and Identification of Green Hypergolic Bipropellants , 2018 .

[19]  Eric J Wernimont System Trade Parameter Comparison of Monopropellants: Hydrogen Peroxide vs Hydrazine and Others , 2006 .

[20]  Stephen D. Heister,et al.  Rocket Grade Hydrogen Peroxide (RGHP) for use in Propulsion and Power Devices - Historical Discussion of Hazards , 2007 .

[21]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  PRISMA - AN AUTONOMOUS FORMATION FLYING MISSION , 2006 .

[22]  Keiichi Hori,et al.  HAN-based green propellant, application, and its combustion mechanism , 2012 .

[23]  K. R. Sridhar Mars sample return mission with in-situ resource utilization , 1995 .

[24]  B. Natan,et al.  THE STATUS OF GEL PROPELLANTS IN YEAR 2000 , 2002 .

[25]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Test Facility for Research on Advanced Green Propellants under High-AltitudeConditions , 2018 .

[26]  Ulrich Gotzig Challenges and Economic Benefits of Green Propellants for Satellite Propulsion , 2017 .

[27]  Mario Kobald,et al.  Years of Test Complex M11 in Lampoldshausen - Research on Space Propulsion Systems for Tomorrow , 2017 .

[28]  Robert K. Masse,et al.  Green Propulsion Advancement: Challenging the Maturity of Monopropellant Hydrazine , 2014 .

[29]  Kjell Anflo,et al.  On-Orbit Operation and Performance of Ammonium Dinitramide (ADN) Based High Performance Green Propulsion (HPGP) Systems , 2017 .

[30]  Keiichi Hori,et al.  Hydroxylammonium nitrate (HAN)-based green propellant as alternative energy resource for potential hydrazine substitution: From lab scale to pilot plant scale-up , 2017 .

[31]  K. Anflo,et al.  In-Space Demonstration of an ADN-based Propulsion System , 2011 .

[32]  Robyn Taylor Safety and Performance Advantages of Nitrous Oxide Fuel Blends (NOFBX) Propellants for Manned and Unmanned Spaceflight Applications , 2012 .

[33]  Dmitry Suslov,et al.  Hot-fire testing of LOx/H2 single coaxial injector at high pressure conditions with optical diagnostics , 2015 .

[34]  Robert K. Masse,et al.  AF-M315E Propulsion System Advances and Improvements , 2016 .

[35]  Kjell Anflo,et al.  The RHEFORM Project - Developments for ADN-Based Liquid Monopropellant Thrusters , 2017 .

[36]  Gary Taylor,et al.  Propulsion Ground Testing with High Test Peroxide: Lessons Learned , 2002 .

[37]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Numerical calculation of heat flux profiles in a N2O/C2H4 premixied green propellant combustor using an inverse heat conduction method , 2016 .

[38]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Flame Propagation and Flashback Behavior of a Green Propellant Consisting of N2O and C2H4 , 2017 .

[39]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Status of Gel Propulsion in the Year 2010 with a Special View on the German Activities , 2010 .

[40]  Helmut Ciezki,et al.  Some Aspects on Safety and Environmental Impact of the German Green Gel Propulsion Technology , 2016 .

[41]  David L. Baker,et al.  Hydrogen Peroxide Accidents and Incidents: What We Can Learn From History , 2005 .