Large Deviations for the Stationary Measure of Networks Under Proportional Fair Allocations

We address a conjecture introduced by Massoulie [Massoulie L (2007) Structural properties of proportional fairness: Stability and insensitivity. Ann. Appl. Probab. 17(3):809–839], concerning the large deviations of the stationary measure of bandwidth-sharing networks functioning under the proportional fair allocation. For Markovian networks, we prove that proportional fair and an associated reversible allocation are geometrically ergodic and have the same large deviations characteristics using Lyapunov functions and martingale arguments. For monotone networks, we give a more direct proof of the same result, relying on stochastic comparisons, that holds for general service time distribution. These results support the intuition that proportional fairness is “close” to allocations of service being insensitive to the service time distribution.

[1]  M. Freidlin,et al.  Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems , 1984 .

[2]  R. Rockafellar Convex Analysis: (pms-28) , 1970 .

[3]  Adam Shwartz,et al.  Large Deviations For Performance Analysis , 2019 .

[4]  Richard L. Tweedie,et al.  Markov Chains and Stochastic Stability , 1993, Communications and Control Engineering Series.

[5]  S. Zachary A Note on Insensitivity in Stochastic Networks , 2006, Journal of Applied Probability.

[6]  R. J. Williams,et al.  Fluid model for a network operating under a fair bandwidth-sharing policy , 2004, math/0407057.

[7]  Alexandre Proutière,et al.  On Stochastic Bounds for Monotonic Processor Sharing Networks , 2004, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[8]  Alan Weiss,et al.  Large Deviations For Performance Analysis: Queues, Communication and Computing , 1995 .

[9]  R. Tyrrell Rockafellar,et al.  Convex Analysis , 1970, Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics and Physics.

[10]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  A queueing analysis of max-min fairness, proportional fairness and balanced fairness , 2006, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[11]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Stability and performance analysis of networks supporting services with rate control-could the Internet be unstable? , 1999, IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320).

[12]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Flow-level performance and capacity of wireless networks with user mobility , 2009, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[13]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control , 2000, TNET.

[14]  P. Moran,et al.  Reversibility and Stochastic Networks , 1980 .

[15]  Alexandre Proutière,et al.  Insensitive Bandwidth Sharing in Data Networks , 2003, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..

[16]  Laurent Massoulié,et al.  Bandwidth sharing: objectives and algorithms , 2002, TNET.

[17]  L. Massouli'e Structural properties of proportional fairness: Stability and insensitivity , 2007, 0707.4542.

[18]  Ken R. Duffy,et al.  Log-convexity of rate region in 802.11e WLANs , 2010, IEEE Communications Letters.

[19]  Michel Mandjes,et al.  Large Deviations for Performance Analysis: Queues, Communications, and Computing , Adam Shwartz and Alan Weiss (New York: Chapman and Hall, 1995). , 1996, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences.

[20]  Alexandre Proutière,et al.  Insensitivity in processor-sharing networks , 2002, Perform. Evaluation.

[21]  Neil S. Walton,et al.  Insensitive, maximum stable allocations converge to proportional fairness , 2010, Queueing Syst. Theory Appl..