Stochastic equations and cities

Stochastic equations constitute a major ingredient in many branches of science, from physics to biology and engineering. Not surprisingly, they appear in many quantitative studies of complex systems. In particular, this type of equation is useful for understanding the dynamics of urban population. Empirically, the population of cities follows a seemingly universal law—called Zipf’s law—which was discovered about a century ago and states that when sorted in decreasing order, the population of a city varies as the inverse of its rank. Recent data however showed that this law is only approximate and in some cases not even verified. In addition, the ranks of cities follow a turbulent dynamics: some cities rise while other fall and disappear. Both these aspects—Zipf’s law (and deviations around it), and the turbulent dynamics of ranks—need to be explained by the same theoretical framework and it is natural to look for the equation that governs the evolution of urban populations. We will review here the main theoretical attempts based on stochastic equations to describe these empirical facts. We start with the simple Gibrat model that introduces random growth rates, and we will then discuss the Gabaix model that adds friction for allowing the existence of a stationary distribution. Concerning the dynamics of ranks, we will discuss a phenomenological stochastic equation that describes rank variations in many systems—including cities—and displays a noise-induced transition. We then illustrate the importance of exchanges between the constituents of the system with the diffusion with noise equation. We will explicit this in the case of cities where a stochastic equation for populations can be derived from first principles and confirms the crucial importance of inter-urban migrations shocks for explaining the statistics and the dynamics of the population of cities.

[1]  Sandro M. Reia,et al.  Spatial structure of city population growth , 2022, Nature Communications.

[2]  M. Barthelemy,et al.  A dominance tree approach to systems of cities , 2022, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[3]  L. Bettencourt Introduction to Urban Science , 2021 .

[4]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Dynamics of ranking , 2021, Nature Communications.

[5]  M. Barthelemy,et al.  The growth equation of cities , 2020, Nature.

[6]  L. Bettencourt,et al.  Demography, Symmetry and the Emergence of Universal Patterns in Urban Systems , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Dagmar Hartge,et al.  Report , 2019, Datenschutz und Datensicherheit - DuD.

[8]  S. Shreve,et al.  Stochastic differential equations , 1955, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[9]  Shougeng Hu,et al.  Zipf’s law and city size distribution: A survey of the literature and future research agenda , 2018 .

[10]  Clémentine Cottineau,et al.  MetaZipf. A dynamic meta-analysis of city size distributions , 2016, PloS one.

[11]  M. Batty The New Science of Cities , 2013 .

[12]  J. Bouchaud Crises and Collective Socio-Economic Phenomena: Simple Models and Challenges , 2012, 1209.0453.

[13]  Ginestra Bianconi,et al.  Dynamics of Ranking Processes in Complex Systems , 2012 .

[14]  Denise Pumain,et al.  Gibrat Revisited: An Urban Growth Model Incorporating Spatial Interaction and Innovation Cycles. 再评吉尔布瑞特:顾及空间相互作用和创新周期的城市增长模型 , 2011 .

[15]  Lucien Benguigui,et al.  The end of a paradigm: is Zipf’s law universal? , 2011, J. Geogr. Syst..

[16]  H. Fischer A History of the Central Limit Theorem: From Classical to Modern Probability Theory , 2010 .

[17]  B. Corominas-Murtra,et al.  Universality of Zipf's law. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Hernán D. Rozenfeld,et al.  The Area and Population of Cities: New Insights from a Different Perspective on Cities , 2009, 1001.5289.

[19]  T. Srokowski Multiplicative Lévy processes: Itô versus Stratonovich interpretation. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[20]  L. Benguigui,et al.  A dynamic model for city size distribution beyond Zipf 's law , 2007 .

[21]  M. Batty Rank clocks , 2006, Nature.

[22]  Dong Li,et al.  Is the Zipf law spurious in explaining city-size distributions? , 2006 .

[23]  K. Soo Zipf's law for cities: a cross-country investigation , 2005 .

[24]  J. Eeckhout Gibrat's Law for (All) Cities , 2004 .

[25]  Sorin Solomon,et al.  Power laws in cities population, financial markets and internet sites (scaling in systems with a variable number of components) , 2000 .

[26]  M. Mézard,et al.  Wealth condensation in a simple model of economy , 2000, cond-mat/0002374.

[27]  Jinqiao Duan,et al.  Fractional Fokker-Planck Equation for Nonlinear Stochastic Differential Equations Driven by Non-Gaussian Levy Stable Noises , 1999, math/0409486.

[28]  X. Gabaix Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[29]  S. Jespersen,et al.  LEVY FLIGHTS IN EXTERNAL FORCE FIELDS : LANGEVIN AND FRACTIONAL FOKKER-PLANCK EQUATIONS AND THEIR SOLUTIONS , 1998, cond-mat/9810176.

[30]  D. Sornette,et al.  Stretched exponential distributions in nature and economy: “fat tails” with characteristic scales , 1998, cond-mat/9801293.

[31]  M. Marsili,et al.  Interacting Individuals Leading to Zipf's Law , 1998, cond-mat/9801289.

[32]  Denise Pumain,et al.  City size distributions and metropolisation , 1997 .

[33]  D. Zanette,et al.  ROLE OF INTERMITTENCY IN URBAN DEVELOPMENT : A MODEL OF LARGE-SCALE CITY FORMATION , 1997 .

[34]  P. Krugman Confronting the Mystery of Urban Hierarchy , 1996 .

[35]  D. Sornette,et al.  Convergent Multiplicative Processes Repelled from Zero: Power Laws and Truncated Power Laws , 1996, cond-mat/9609074.

[36]  S. Solomon,et al.  POWER LAWS ARE LOGARITHMIC BOLTZMANN LAWS , 1996, adap-org/9607001.

[37]  N. F. Stewart,et al.  The Gravity Model in Transportation Analysis - Theory and Extensions , 1990 .

[38]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: Statistical mechanisms, models and physical applications , 1990 .

[39]  H. Kesten Random difference equations and Renewal theory for products of random matrices , 1973 .

[40]  J. Henderson The Sizes and Types of Cities , 1972 .

[41]  C. Fox The $G$ and $H$ functions as symmetrical Fourier kernels , 1961 .

[42]  R VRINAT,et al.  [The growth of cities]. , 1961, Concours medical.

[43]  K. Chung,et al.  Limit Distributions for Sums of Independent Random Variables , 1955 .

[44]  Yuen Ren Chao,et al.  Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology , 1950 .

[45]  H. Singer,et al.  The "courbe des populations" : a parallel to Pareto's Law , 1936 .

[46]  D. Pumain Scaling laws and urban systems , 2004 .

[47]  J. Córdoba,et al.  On the Distribution of City Sizes , 2003 .

[48]  Yannis M. Ioannides,et al.  Zipf’s law for cities : an empirical examination , 2000 .

[49]  N. G. van Kampen,et al.  Itô versus Stratonovich , 1981 .

[50]  F. Auerbach Das Gesetz der Bevölkerungskonzentration. , 1913 .