Interactive dynamics: effects of student-centered activities on learning

During the spring and fall 1998 semesters, a traditional lecture and problem-solving based course in introductory dynamics was redesigned to include student centered Web-based, team learning activities. The enhanced "interactive dynamics" course was created to engage students in a collaborative environment in which students have easy access to an array of technology. Classroom activities and out-of-class assignments model real-world problems. Preliminary analysis of the assessment data indicates that students' performance on a test of dynamics content knowledge in innovative sections was similar to that of students in traditional sections. However, students in the more active classroom environments reported statistically significant gains in teamwork and computer skills, thus meeting the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 goal of encouraging innovative practices in the classroom that enhance learning and develop skills needed in the workplace. This paper describes: (1) recent educational initiatives; (2) the interactive dynamics course; (3) assessment results to date; (4) the learning outcomes affected when these types of active learning strategies are employed in the engineering classroom; and (5) how assessments are being used to improve the course.

[1]  J. Tagg,et al.  From Teaching to Learning — A New Paradigm For Undergraduate Education , 1995 .

[2]  Castl Survey.  The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching , 1910, Nature.

[3]  D. Hestenes,et al.  A mechanics baseline test , 1992 .

[4]  Francesco Costanzo,et al.  The interactive classroom and its integration into the mechanics curriculum , 1999 .

[5]  Charles C. Bonwell,et al.  Using active learning in college class : a range of options for faculty , 1996 .

[6]  K. Cross.  Classroom Research: Implementing the Scholarship of Teaching. , 1996 .

[7]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[8]  Marcia B. Baxter Magolda.  Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students' Intellectual Development , 1992 .

[9]  Heidi Hayes Jacobs.  The Integrated Curriculum. , 1991 .

[10]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperative learning : increasing college faculty instructional productivity , 1991 .

[11]  R. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research and Practice , 1990 .

[12]  Paul S. George,et al.  The Integrated Curriculum: A Reality Check , 1996 .

[13]  David Eli Drew,et al.  Increasing Minority Students' Success in Calculus. , 1995 .

[14]  Francesco Costanzo,et al.  Collaborative Learning In Undergraduate Dynamics Courses: Some Examples , 1999 .

[15]  R. Felder,et al.  Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction , 1996 .

[16]  M. Belenky,et al.  Women's ways of knowing : the development of self, voice, and mind , 1988 .

[17]  Francesco Costanzo,et al.  Interactive Dynamics: A Collaborative Approach To Learning Undergraduate Dynamics , 1999 .

[18]  Blythe McVicker Clinchy,et al.  Women s ways of knowing: The development of self , 1988 .

[19]  Francis J. Sullivan,et al.  Simulating the Workplace in an Engineering Technology Course: A Rhetorical Model , 1997 .

[20]  Chet Meyers,et al.  Promoting Active Learning: Strategies for the College Classroom , 1993 .

[21]  E. Boyer.  Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate , 1990 .

[22]  Stefani A. Bjorklund,et al.  Preparing For Abet 2000: Assessment At The Classroom Level , 1998 .

[23]  Laura M. Ventimiglia.  Cooperative Learning at the College Level. , 1994 .