Cyber-Aggression and Victimization and Social Information Processing: Integrating the Medium and the Message

Objective: To theoretically examine how the functional properties of Information and Communications Technologies (ICTs) may potentially influence social information processing (SIP) relevant to cyber-aggression and victimization (CAV), and the opportunities for aggression and victimization that these new technologies provide. Results: Our conceptual analysis highlights multiple functional properties of ICTs that provide opportunities for CAV, and implicates new social norms arising around use of ICTs that may also distinguish online from offline aggression and victimization. These include the paucity and/or permanence of social cues, the deployment of substitute cues (e.g., emoticons), ambiguity around intentions of communicators and around perceptions of privacy and audience, and the removal of response inhibitors resulting from continuous access to ICTs. Conclusions: Our analysis provides a useful heuristic device and reveals a need for innovative research to better examine how features of ICTs modulate social information processing to increase (or decrease) the likelihood of cyber-aggression and victimization. The consideration of SIP in understanding CAV opens important avenues for future empirical inquiry.

[1]  B. O. de Castro,et al.  Rage and revenge: Highly aggressive boys' explanations for their responses to ambiguous provocation , 2012 .

[2]  Jennifer Marmo,et al.  The rules of Facebook friendship , 2012 .

[3]  D. Finkelhor,et al.  Let's prevent peer victimization, not just bullying. , 2012, Child abuse & neglect.

[4]  Robert Slonje,et al.  Processes of cyberbullying, and feelings of remorse by bullies: A pilot study , 2012 .

[5]  Ersilia Menesini,et al.  Recalling unpresented hostile words: False memories predictors of traditional and cyberbullying , 2012 .

[6]  Jennifer D. Shapka,et al.  The changing face of bullying: An empirical comparison between traditional and internet bullying and victimization , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Jennifer D. Shapka,et al.  Are Cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  T. Pigott,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of School-Based Bullying Prevention Programs' Effects on Bystander Intervention Behavior , 2012 .

[9]  M. McCartney.  Online is not a private space , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  Marc D. Lewis,et al.  Three Time Scales of Neural Self-Organization Underlying Basic and Nonbasic Emotions , 2011 .

[11]  Sarah Falconer,et al.  Current Evidence of Best Practice in Whole-School Bullying Intervention and Its Potential to Inform Cyberbullying Interventions , 2011, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[12]  K. Dodge,et al.  Context matters in child and family policy. , 2011, Child development.

[13]  Andreas König,et al.  Cyberbullying as an Act of Revenge? , 2010, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[14]  Christiane Spiel,et al.  Cyber-Victimisation: The Association Between Help-Seeking Behaviours and Self-Reported Emotional Symptoms in Australia and Austria , 2010, Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling.

[15]  D. Cross,et al.  Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents , 2010, Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health.

[16]  D. Keating,et al.  Anger and inhibitory control as moderators of children's hostile attributions and aggression , 2010 .

[17]  E. Lemerise,et al.  The Effect of Induced Mood on Children’s Social Information Processing: Goal Clarification and Response Decision , 2010, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[18]  Robert S. Tokunaga,et al.  Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  C. Pornari,et al.  Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: the role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. , 2010, Aggressive behavior.

[20]  Aaron Smith,et al.  Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. , 2010 .

[21]  S. Perren,et al.  Children’s Peer Victimization, Empathy, and Emotional Symptoms , 2010, Child psychiatry and human development.

[22]  Clayton R. Cook,et al.  Predictors of Bullying and Victimization in Childhood and Adolescence: A Meta-analytic Investigation , 2010 .

[23]  Tracy Vaillancourt,et al.  Bullying and morality: Understanding how good kids can behave badly. , 2009 .

[24]  F. Mishna,et al.  Ongoing and Online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying , 2009 .

[25]  Laurence Steinberg,et al.  Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[26]  A. Jawad,et al.  An Initial Evaluation of a Culturally Adapted Social Problem-Solving and Relational Aggression Prevention Program for Urban African-American Relationally Aggressive Girls , 2009, Journal of prevention & intervention in the community.

[27]  R. Iannotti,et al.  School bullying among adolescents in the United States: physical, verbal, relational, and cyber. , 2009, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[28]  K. Modecki.  “It’s a Rush”: Psychosocial Content of Antisocial Decision Making , 2009, Law and human behavior.

[29]  G. S. Pettit,et al.  Development of Response Evaluation and Decision (RED) and antisocial behavior in childhood and adolescence. , 2009, Developmental psychology.

[30]  T. Joiner,et al.  Anger rumination across forms of aggression , 2009 .

[31]  D. Cross,et al.  Cyberbullying Versus Face-to-Face Bullying A Theoretical and Conceptual Review , 2009 .

[32]  Özgür Erdur-Baker,et al.  Examination of Cyberbullying Experiences among Turkish Students from Different School Types , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression , 2008, New Media Soc..

[34]  Daantje Derks,et al.  The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Francine Dehue,et al.  Cyberbullying: Youngsters' Experiences and Parental Perception , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  Peter K. Smith,et al.  Cyberbullying: its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. , 2008, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[37]  L. Steinberg.  A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking. , 2008, Developmental review : DR.

[38]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  The Relationship between Cyberbullying and School Bullying , 2008 .

[39]  Justin W. Patchin,et al.  Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Analysis of Factors Related to Offending and Victimization , 2008 .

[40]  Janet L. Johnson,et al.  Transtheoretical-based bullying prevention effectiveness trials in middle schools and high schools , 2007 .

[41]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: implications for school intervention. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[42]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Electronic bullying among middle school students. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[43]  K. Williams,et al.  Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[44]  J. Wolak,et al.  Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. , 2007, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[45]  L. Steinberg,et al.  Age differences in resistance to peer influence. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[46]  Ellen Helsper,et al.  Taking risks when communicating on the Internet: the role of offline social-psychological factors in young people's vulnerability to online risks , 2007 .

[47]  Kanji Akahori,et al.  Effects of emotional cues transmitted in e-mail communication on the emotions experienced by senders and receivers , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[48]  K. Aunola,et al.  Situation-specificity of children's social goals: Changing goals according to changing situations? , 2007 .

[49]  Juliana Raskauskas,et al.  Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. , 2007, Developmental psychology.

[50]  Eric Stice,et al.  Reciprocal relations between rumination and bulimic, substance abuse, and depressive symptoms in female adolescents. , 2007, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[51]  Daantje Derks,et al.  Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  R. G. Fontaine.  Real-Time Decision Making and Aggressive Behavior in Youth: A Heuristic Model of Response Evaluation and Decision (Red) , 2006, Aggressive behavior.

[53]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Examining Characteristics and Associated Distress Related to Internet Harassment: Findings From the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey , 2006, Pediatrics.

[54]  A. Jawad,et al.  Social cognition in context: validating a cartoon-based attributional measure for urban girls. , 2006, Child development.

[55]  Shenyang Guo,et al.  Social information-processing skills training to promote social competence and prevent aggressive behavior in the third grades. , 2005, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[56]  Christina Salmivalli,et al.  An interpersonal circumplex model of children's social goals: links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. , 2005, Developmental psychology.

[57]  E. Lemerise,et al.  The influence of provocateurs' emotion displays on the social information processing of children varying in social adjustment and age. , 2005, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[58]  Susan Bobbitt Nolen,et al.  Effects of a school-based social-emotional competence program: Linking children's goals, attributions, and behavior , 2005 .

[59]  M. Camodeca,et al.  Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims. , 2005, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[60]  J. Juvonen,et al.  Sticks and Stones May Break My Bones, but Names Will Make Me Feel Sick: The Psychosocial, Somatic, and Scholastic Consequences of Peer Harassment , 2005, Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53.

[61]  Michele L. Ybarra,et al.  Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45:7 (2004), pp 1308–1316 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00328.x Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics , 2022 .

[62]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[63]  A. Cillessen,et al.  Sociometric Status and Children's Peer Experiences: Use of the Daily Diary Method , 2003 .

[64]  C. Stangor,et al.  The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[65]  T. Kelly,et al.  Sensation seeking, puberty, and nicotine, alcohol, and marijuana use in adolescence. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[66]  L. Tidwell,et al.  Computer-Mediated Communication Effects on Disclosure, Impressions, and Interpersonal Evaluations: Getting to Know One Another a Bit at a Time , 2002 .

[67]  B. Orobio de Castro,et al.  Hostile attribution of intent and aggressive behavior: a meta-analysis. , 2002, Child development.

[68]  Karin S. Frey,et al.  Changing Adolescents' Attitudes About Relational and Physical Aggression: An Early Evaluation of a School-Based Intervention , 2002 .

[69]  J. Allen,et al.  The Same Old Song?—Stability and Change in Relationship Schemas from Adolescence to Young Adulthood , 2002, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[70]  A. Joinson.  Self‐disclosure in computer‐mediated communication: The role of self‐awareness and visual anonymity , 2001 .

[71]  E. Lemerise,et al.  An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. , 2000, Child development.

[72]  R. Bell,et al.  Personality and aggression: The Dissipation–Rumination Scale. , 1997 .

[73]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. , 1996, Child development.

[74]  K. Dodge,et al.  A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. , 1994 .

[75]  K. Dodge,et al.  Hostile attributional biases in severely aggressive adolescents. , 1990, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[76]  G. Ladd,et al.  Children's perceptions of the outcomes of social strategies : do the ends justify being mean? , 1990 .

[77]  R. Slaby,et al.  Evaluative factors in social problem solving by aggressive boys , 1989, Journal of abnormal child psychology.

[78]  Nancy G. Guerra,et al.  Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: I. Assessment. , 1988 .

[79]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[80]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social cognitive biases and deficits in aggressive boys. , 1982, Child development.

[81]  D. Olweus.  Aggression in the schools : bullies and whipping boys , 1978 .

[82]  M. Mcluhan.  Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man , 1964 .