Biomarker-based adaptive trials for patients with glioblastoma--lessons from I-SPY 2.

The traditional clinical trials infrastructure may not be ideally suited to evaluate the numerous therapeutic hypotheses that result from the increasing number of available targeted agents combined with the various methodologies to molecularly subclassify patients with glioblastoma. Additionally, results from smaller screening studies are rarely translated to successful larger confirmatory studies, potentially related to a lack of efficient control arms or the use of unvalidated surrogate endpoints. Streamlining clinical trials and providing a flexible infrastructure for biomarker development is clearly needed for patients with glioblastoma. The experience developing and implementing the I-SPY studies in breast cancer may serve as a guide to developing such trials in neuro-oncology.

[1]  D. Berry,et al.  Reports from the 2010 Clinical and Translational Cancer Research Think Tank Meeting: Design Strategies for Personalized Therapy Trials , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[2]  Z. Ram,et al.  The impact of enrollment in clinical trials on survival of patients with glioblastoma , 2012, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[3]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Phase 2 trial design in neuro-oncology revisited: a report from the RANO group. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[5]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Patients with IDH 1 wild type anaplastic astrocytomas exhibit worse prognosis than IDH 1-mutated glioblastomas , and IDH 1 mutation status accounts for the unfavorable prognostic effect of higher age : implications for classification of gliomas , 2010 .

[6]  K. Aldape,et al.  A multigene predictor of outcome in glioblastoma. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[7]  G. Pond,et al.  Comparison of outcomes of phase II studies and subsequent randomized control studies using identical chemotherapeutic regimens. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  Joshua M. Korn,et al.  Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways , 2008, Nature.

[9]  E. Hubbard,et al.  Initiative , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[10]  M. Mehta,et al.  Role of isocitrate dehydrogenase in glioma , 2011, Expert review of neurotherapeutics.

[11]  C. Meyer,et al.  Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  J. Uhm Updated Response Assessment Criteria for High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group , 2010 .

[13]  D A Berry,et al.  A case for Bayesianism in clinical trials. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  Steven Piantadosi,et al.  Survival of Patients with Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Treated with Radiation and Temozolomide in Research Studies in the United States , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[15]  D. Berry Bayesian Statistics and the Efficiency and Ethics of Clinical Trials , 2004 .

[16]  D. Berry Bayesian clinical trials , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[17]  A. Heimberger,et al.  The PEPvIII-KLH (CDX-110) vaccine in glioblastoma multiforme patients , 2009, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[18]  D. Berry Adaptive clinical trials in oncology , 2012, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[19]  S. Glück,et al.  Pathologic complete response predicts recurrence-free survival more effectively by cancer subset: Results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL-CALGB 150007/150012, ACRIN 6657 , 2013 .

[20]  Marc E. Lenburg,et al.  Chemotherapy response and recurrence-free survival in neoadjuvant breast cancer depends on biomarker profiles: results from the I-SPY 1 TRIAL (CALGB 150007/150012; ACRIN 6657) , 2011, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[21]  D. Berry,et al.  Adaptive assignment versus balanced randomization in clinical trials: a decision analysis. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[22]  Edward S. Kim,et al.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer. , 2011, Cancer discovery.

[23]  Wei Chen,et al.  Predicting treatment response of malignant gliomas to bevacizumab and irinotecan by imaging proliferation with [18F] fluorothymidine positron emission tomography: a pilot study. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  Draft Guidance Adaptive Design Clinical Trials for Drugs and Biologics , 2010 .

[25]  Timothy F Cloughesy,et al.  Progression-free survival: an important end point in evaluating therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas. , 2008, Neuro-oncology.

[26]  J. Buckner,et al.  The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. , 2007, Neuro-oncology.

[27]  D. Berry,et al.  I‐SPY 2: An Adaptive Breast Cancer Trial Design in the Setting of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy , 2009, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[28]  D. Berry,et al.  An overview of the adaptive designs accelerating promising trials into treatments (ADAPT-IT) project. , 2012, Annals of emergency medicine.

[29]  G. Parmigiani,et al.  Bayesian adaptive randomized trial design for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[30]  Susan Groshen,et al.  The Design of Phase II Clinical Trials Testing Cancer Therapeutics: Consensus Recommendations from the Clinical Trial Design Task Force of the National Cancer Institute Investigational Drug Steering Committee , 2010, Clinical Cancer Research.

[31]  D. Slamon,et al.  HER2 testing and correlation with efficacy of trastuzumab therapy. , 2002, Oncology.

[32]  M. Krams,et al.  Adaptive Designs in Clinical Drug Development—An Executive Summary of the PhRMA Working Group , 2006, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[33]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  Temozolomide chemotherapy alone versus radiotherapy alone for malignant astrocytoma in the elderly: the NOA-08 randomised, phase 3 trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[34]  J. Uhm An Integrated Genomic Analysis of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2009 .

[35]  Leland S. Hu,et al.  Reevaluating the imaging definition of tumor progression: perfusion MRI quantifies recurrent glioblastoma tumor fraction, pseudoprogression, and radiation necrosis to predict survival , 2012, Neuro-oncology.

[36]  R. McLendon,et al.  IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[37]  A. Verma MGMT Gene Silencing and Benefit From Temozolomide in Glioblastoma , 2006 .

[38]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Six-month progression-free survival as an alternative primary efficacy endpoint to overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients receiving temozolomide. , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[39]  Susan M. Chang,et al.  Incorporation of Biomarker Assessment in Novel Clinical Trial Designs: Personalizing Brain Tumor Treatments , 2011, Current oncology reports.

[40]  A. Brandes,et al.  MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  D. Berry Adaptive clinical trials: the promise and the caution. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  G. Yin,et al.  Worth Adapting? Revisiting the Usefulness of Outcome-Adaptive Randomization , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.

[43]  D. Pompliano,et al.  Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. , 2007 .

[44]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. , 2006, Cancer cell.