Polarization at metal–biomolecular interfaces in solution

Metal surfaces in contact with water, surfactants and biopolymers experience attractive polarization owing to induced charges. This fundamental physical interaction complements stronger epitaxial and covalent surface interactions and remains difficult to measure experimentally. We present a first step to quantify polarization on even gold (Au) surfaces in contact with water and with aqueous solutions of peptides of different charge state (A3 and Flg-Na3) by molecular dynamics simulation in all-atomic resolution and a posteriori computation of the image potential. Attractive polarization scales with the magnitude of atomic charges and with the length of multi-poles in the aqueous phase such as the distance between cationic and anionic groups. The polarization energy per surface area is similar on aqueous Au {1 1 1} and Au {1 0 0} interfaces of approximately −50 mJ m−2 and decreases to −70 mJ m−2 in the presence of charged peptides. In molecular terms, the polarization energy corresponds to −2.3 and −0.1 kJ mol−1 for water in the first and second molecular layers on the metal surface, and to between −40 and 0 kJ mol−1 for individual amino acids in the peptides depending on the charge state, multi-pole length and proximity to the surface. The net contribution of polarization to peptide adsorption on the metal surface is determined by the balance between polarization by the peptide and loss of polarization by replaced surface-bound water. On metal surfaces with significant epitaxial attraction of peptides such as Au {1 1 1}, polarization contributes only 10–20% to total adsorption related to similar polarity of water and of amino acids. On metal surfaces with weak epitaxial attraction of peptides such as Au {1 0 0}, polarization is a major contribution to adsorption, especially for charged peptides (−80 kJ mol−1 for peptide Flg-Na3). A remaining water interlayer between the metal surface and the peptide then reduces losses in polarization energy by replaced surface-bound water. Computed polarization energies are sensitive to the precise location of the image plane (within tenths of Angstroms near the jellium edge). The computational method can be extended to complex nanometre and micrometer-size surface topologies.

[1]  Heinz-Bernhard Kraatz,et al.  Effect of the surface curvature on the secondary structure of peptides adsorbed on nanoparticles. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[2]  Walter Kohn,et al.  Theory of Metal Surfaces: Charge Density and Surface Energy , 1970 .

[3]  M. Osman,et al.  Wettability of native silver surfaces , 1996 .

[4]  D. Wright,et al.  Biomimetic mineralization of noble metal nanoclusters. , 2003, Biomacromolecules.

[5]  Ruth Pachter,et al.  Toward understanding amino acid adsorption at metallic interfaces: a density functional theory study. , 2009, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[6]  Frederick W. King,et al.  Theory of Raman scattering by molecules adsorbed on electrode surfaces , 1978 .

[7]  J. Goodisman,et al.  Contribution of the Metal to the Differential Capacity of an Ideally Polarisable Electrode , 1983 .

[8]  Hendrik Heinz,et al.  Computational screening of biomolecular adsorption and self‐assembly on nanoscale surfaces , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  Johnson,et al.  Image planes and surface states. , 1985, Physical review letters.

[10]  F. Baneyx,et al.  MATERIALS ASSEMBLY AND FORMATION USING ENGINEERED POLYPEPTIDES , 2004 .

[11]  Irshad Hussain,et al.  Rational and combinatorial design of peptide capping ligands for gold nanoparticles. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[12]  R. Naik,et al.  Adsorption of peptides (A3, Flg, Pd2, Pd4) on gold and palladium surfaces by a coarse-grained Monte Carlo simulation. , 2009, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[13]  W. Schmickler,et al.  Recent developments in models for the interface between a metal and an aqueous solution , 2000 .

[14]  H. Koerner,et al.  Force Field for Mica-Type Silicates and Dynamics of Octadecylammonium Chains Grafted to Montmorillonite , 2005 .

[15]  D. Henderson,et al.  The interphase between jellium and a hard sphere electrolyte. A model for the electric double layer , 1984 .

[16]  M. W. Finnis,et al.  The interaction of a point charge with an aluminium (111) surface , 1991 .

[17]  E. Mcrae Electronic surface resonances of crystals , 1979 .

[18]  D. Osguthorpe,et al.  Structure and energetics of ligand binding to proteins: Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase‐trimethoprim, a drug‐receptor system , 1988, Proteins.

[19]  Richard A. Vaia,et al.  Accurate Simulation of Surfaces and Interfaces of Face-Centered Cubic Metals Using 12−6 and 9−6 Lennard-Jones Potentials , 2008 .

[20]  Stanley Brown,et al.  Protein-Mediated Particle Assembly , 2001 .

[21]  U. Suter,et al.  Atomic Charges for Classical Simulations of Polar Systems , 2004 .

[22]  K. Schulten,et al.  Molecular biomimetics: nanotechnology through biology , 2003, Nature materials.

[23]  Xiaohua Huang,et al.  Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  Ruth Pachter,et al.  Nature of molecular interactions of peptides with gold, palladium, and Pd-Au bimetal surfaces in aqueous solution. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  J. Soler,et al.  Image-Plane Position Dependence on Metal Crystallographic Face , 1989 .

[26]  R. Naik,et al.  Biologically Programmed Synthesis of Bimetallic Nanostructures , 2006 .

[27]  J. O'm. Bockris,et al.  On the structure of charged interfaces , 1963, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  W. Kohn,et al.  Theory of Metal Surfaces: Induced Surface Charge and Image Potential. , 1973 .

[29]  E. Leiva,et al.  The double layer at the interface between a simple metal and an aqueous solution , 1995 .

[30]  J. Bardeen The Image and Van der Waals Forces at a Metallic Surface , 1940 .

[31]  Carlo Cavazzoni,et al.  Hydroxyl-rich beta-sheet adhesion to the gold surface in water by first-principle simulations. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  D. Henderson,et al.  Approximate solution for the electronic density profile at the surface of jellium , 1984 .

[33]  Arrigo Calzolari,et al.  Mixing of electronic states in pentacene adsorption on copper. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[34]  L. Gui,et al.  Assemblies of Metal Nanoparticles and Self‐Assembled Peptide Fibrils—Formation of Double Helical and Single‐Chain Arrays of Metal Nanoparticles , 2003 .

[35]  R. Naik,et al.  Synthesis of gold nanoparticles using multifunctional peptides. , 2005, Small.

[36]  Kurt Kremer,et al.  Dual-scale modeling of benzene adsorption onto Ni(111) and Au(111) surfaces in explicit water. , 2005, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[37]  Smith,et al.  Distance of the image plane from metal surfaces. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[38]  C. Murphy,et al.  Anisotropic metal nanoparticles: Synthesis, assembly, and optical applications. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. B.