Behavioral Transition: A Framework for the Construction Conflict--Tension Relationship

Conflicts are inevitable in construction projects. One of the reasons is that all construction projects involve complex human interactions. Previous studies have shown that behavioral states can respond dynamically as the magnitude of a conflict increases. This has been empirically demonstrated using a catastrophe-theory-based, three-variable system involving the level of construction conflict, the level of tension, and the amount of behavioral flexibility (Yiu and Cheung, 2006). This paper reports on a study that builds on the above-mentioned study by Yiu and Cheung, and examines the application of moderated multiple regression (MMR) to the three-variable system. It was found that not all MMR models display a significant moderating effect. Two out of six MMR models were found to be significant in their effect. These models affirm that the nature of the relationship between the degree of uncertainty and adversarial attitudes (or mistrust level) varies, depending on the behavioral flexibility of the parties. Disordinal interactions were also found, suggesting that the interaction between behavioral flexibility and the conflict-tension relationship can change radically. Critical points for the degree of uncertainty were also able to be calculated. Beyond these points, even a flexible individual may find difficulty in minimizing or resolving construction conflicts. As such, it is suggested that such radical changes could be prevented by minimizing the degree of uncertainty in construction projects.

[1]  Edward De Bono.  Conflicts: A Better Way to Resolve Them , 1985 .

[2]  James J. Callahan,et al.  Predictive models in psychoanalysis , 1990 .

[3]  R. Darlington,et al.  Regression and Linear Models , 1990 .

[4]  D. Etzion,et al.  Moderating effect of social support on the stress-burnout relationship. , 1984, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  L. Coser,et al.  Conflict: Resolution and Prevention. , 1991 .

[6]  R. Baden Hellard,et al.  Managing construction conflict , 1988 .

[7]  Darrick M. Mix.  ADR in the Construction Industry: Continuing the Development of a More Efficient Dispute Resolution Mechanism , 1997 .

[8]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  Phase transitions in social impact models of opinion formation , 2000 .

[9]  Annemie Ploeger,et al.  Stochastic catastrophe analysis of switches in the perception of apparent motion , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  R. Walton,et al.  The Management of Interdepartmental Conflict: A Model and Review. , 1969 .

[11]  Seung Heon Han,et al.  Lessons learned from rigid conflict resolution in an organization: Construction conflict case study , 2003 .

[12]  Kathleen M. J. Harmon.  Conflicts between Owner and Contractors: Proposed Intervention Process , 2003 .

[13]  T. Bonoma,et al.  Managing Organizational Conflict: A Model for Diagnosis and Intervention , 1979 .

[14]  C. Coulton,et al.  Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression , 1993 .

[15]  Stephen J. Zaccaro,et al.  Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. , 1991 .

[16]  S. Zacks,et al.  Applications of Catastrophe Theory for Statistical Modeling in the Biosciences , 1985 .

[17]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[18]  Debra L. Shapiro,et al.  DO JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS INFLUENCE STYLES OF HANDLING CONFLICT WITH SUPERVISORS?: WHAT JUSTICE PERCEPTIONS, PRECISELY? , 2000 .

[19]  A. Walker MSc PhD Frics.  Project Management in Construction , 1984 .

[20]  David Lowe,et al.  Conflict and dispute in construction , 1997 .

[21]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  What Goes Around Comes Around: the Impact of Personal Conflict Style on Work Conflict and Stress , 2006 .

[22]  P.A.I. Hartelman,et al.  Stochastic Catastrophe Theory , 1997 .

[23]  Arthur G. Butler,et al.  Project Management: A Study in Organizational Conflict , 1973 .

[24]  John Simmons,et al.  Analysis of conflict and change in construction projects , 1992 .

[25]  Onur Behzat Tokdemir,et al.  Predicting the Outcome of Construction Litigation Using Neural Networks , 1998 .

[26]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[27]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  Sudden Transitions in Attitudes , 2003 .

[28]  R. Thom.  Structural stability and morphogenesis , 1977, Pattern Recognition.

[29]  Loren Cobb,et al.  Stochastic catastrophe models and multimodal distributions , 1978 .

[30]  E. Pedhazur.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction , 1982 .

[31]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[32]  T. W. Barrett,et al.  Catastrophe Theory, Selected Papers 1972-1977 , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[33]  Bill Watson,et al.  Statistical catastrophe theory: An overview , 1980 .

[34]  Terence A. Oliva,et al.  The relationships among consumer satisfaction, involvement, and product performance: A catastrophe theory application , 1995 .

[35]  L. K. Ta'eed,et al.  Determinants involved in the perception of the Necker cube: an application of catastrophe theory. , 1988, Behavioral science.

[36]  Anthony Saunders,et al.  A Catastrophe Model of Bank Failure , 1980 .

[37]  F. Pretorius,et al.  Conflict and individual coping behaviour in informal matrix organizations within the construction industry , 1986 .

[38]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Managerial Grid , 1994 .

[39]  M. Lewis-Beck.  Applied Regression: An Introduction , 1980 .

[40]  Mohan M. Kumaraswamy.  CONSEQUENCES OF CONSTRUCTION CONFLICT: A HONG KONG PERSPECTIVE , 1998 .

[41]  M. Deakin.  Catastrophe theory. , 1977, Science.

[42]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[43]  Peter J. Carnevale,et al.  Contingencies in the Mediation of Disputes , 1990 .

[44]  Peter R. Hibberd,et al.  ADR and Adjudication in Construction Disputes , 1999 .

[45]  John Simmons,et al.  CONFLICT IN SMALL- AND MEDIUM-SIZED PROJECTS: CASE OF PARTNERING TO THE RESCUE , 1998 .

[46]  Albert B. Cherns,et al.  Studying the client's role in construction management , 1984 .

[47]  Robert Newcombe,et al.  Empowering the construction project team , 1996 .

[48]  H.L.J. van der Maas,et al.  Stagewise cognitive development: an application of catastrophe theory. , 1992, Psychological review.

[49]  Lee J. Cronbach,et al.  Psychological tests and personnel decisions , 1958 .

[50]  William D. Berry,et al.  Multiple regression in practice , 1985 .

[51]  E. C. Zeeman,et al.  On the unstable behaviour of stock exchanges , 1974 .

[52]  G. Schwarz.  Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[53]  John B. Cullen,et al.  A catastrophe theory model of technological and structural change , 1992 .

[54]  M. Rahim,et al.  A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[55]  L. Cobb.  Estimation Theory for the Cusp Catastrophe Model , 1980 .

[56]  Brian R. Flay,et al.  CATASTROPHE THEORY IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY: SOME APPLICATIONS TO ATTITUDES AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR' , 1978 .

[57]  Paul A. Herbig,et al.  A Cusp Catastrophe Model of the Adoption of an Industrial Innovation , 1991 .

[58]  Sai On Cheung,et al.  A catastrophe model of construction conflict behavior , 2006 .

[59]  I. Stewart,et al.  Catastrophe theory modeling in psychology. , 1983 .

[60]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perspectiveness and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness , 1991 .

[61]  L. Cobb,et al.  Estimation and Moment Recursion Relations for Multimodal Distributions of the Exponential Family , 1983 .