A new approach to interoperable information standards for health and social care: normalizing culture, contracts and co-design

Background: In recognition of the limitations of technology-led standards for practitioner implementation of electronic care records, the Professional Record Standards Body for health and social care (PRSB) was established in the UK in 2013. The remit of PRSB is to develop and assure standards for the content and structure of records across all care sectors, based upon professionally-led and patient-guided requirements as endorsed by the professional bodies of the constituent health and social care disciplines. This new initiative is a very different approach from previous national information projects and faces challenges including organizational culture, operational procurement requirements and the logistics of collaborative design. Objective: This paper describes the progress of PRSB and the practical issues it faces to achieve deep stakeholder engagement and widespread adoption of its standards and guidance. The goal is to offer a sustainable approach that builds on the strengths of work to date, learns from past experience of what works and what fails, and draws upon theoretical models of transformational change. Methods: We conceptualize the PRSB strategy in terms of organizational change frameworks, evaluate it against models of success factors in health information technology and employ Normalization Process Theory (NPT) to articulate the activity stages required for realization of its goals. Results: We present an NPT model of how PRSB standards can become embedded in routine practice for care practitioners, patients/citizens, government agencies and information technology providers. We suggest some critical success factors for cultural change, moving the supplier market and sustaining a genuine co-design approach. Conclusions: It is abundantly clear that interoperability involves far more than just technology. Improving information sharing between care practitioners and with patients and citizens requires the innovative professionally-led and patient-guided approach that PRSB has pioneered. It is necessary to formally evaluate the impacts of implementation, both to build a compelling evidence base and to generate a virtuous cycle of iterative maintenance and general adoption.

[1]  Vikram Patel,et al.  Theory of Change: a theory-driven approach to enhance the Medical Research Council's framework for complex interventions , 2014, Trials.

[2]  R. By,et al.  Organisational change management: A critical review , 2005 .

[3]  C. May,et al.  Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory , 2009 .

[4]  M. Jaana,et al.  Prioritizing the Risk Factors Influencing the Success of Clinical Information System Projects , 2008, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[5]  Matt-Mouley Bouamrane,et al.  Delivering digital health and well-being at scale: lessons learned during the implementation of the dallas program in the United Kingdom , 2015, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[6]  H. Rainey,et al.  Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector , 2006 .

[7]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[9]  Elske Ammenwerth,et al.  Bmc Medical Informatics and Decision Making It-adoption and the Interaction of Task, Technology and Individuals: a Fit Framework and a Case Study , 2022 .

[10]  J. Kotter Leading change: why transformation efforts fail , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[11]  C. Dowrick,et al.  Complex interventions , 2022, International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology.

[12]  D. Bates,et al.  Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. , 2013, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[13]  I. Vogel,et al.  Review of the use of 'Theory of Change' in international development. Review Report. , 2012 .

[14]  F. Mair,et al.  Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit , 2011, BMC health services research.

[15]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  The policy-practice nexus of electronic health records adoption in the UK NHS: An institutional analysis , 2011, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[16]  P. Scott Mixed Methods: A Paradigm for Holistic Evaluation of Health IT. , 2016, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[17]  I. Carpenter,et al.  Medical records and record-keeping standards. , 2007, Clinical medicine.

[18]  Richard J. Holden,et al.  The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care , 2010, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[19]  D. Kalra,et al.  Developing a conformance methodology for clinically-defined medical record headings: a preliminary report. , 2015 .

[20]  Steven H. Appelbaum,et al.  Back to the future: revisiting Kotter's 1996 change model , 2012 .