Frameless, Real-Time, Surface Imaging-Guided Radiosurgery: Clinical Outcomes for Brain Metastases.

Frameless stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for intracranial brain metastases can provide more comfortable treatment setup than rigid frame-based immobilization with equivalent accuracy. The aim of this study is to report the UCSD SRS experience and update the clinical outcomes using a novel real-time, frameless, surface imaging-guided (SIG-RS) technique in the treatment of brain metastases. Data were retrospectively examined for 163 patients totaling 490 lesions and 45 post-operative cavities treated with SIG- RS in a median delivery of 1 fraction (range, 1-5 fraction) and to a median dose of 22 Gy (range, 12-30 Gy). Local control and overall survival were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up for all patients was 6.7 months (range, 0.5-45.1 months), with 119 of 163 (73%) deceased at the time of analysis. The 134 patients (82%) with follow-up imaging studies totaling 378 lesions and 39 post-operative cavities were evaluated for local control. The actuarial 6- and 12-month local control was 90% (95% confidence interval (CI), 84-94%) and 79% (95% CI, 71-86%), respectively. The actuarial 6- and 12-month overall survival was 80% (95% CI, 74-85%) and 56% (95% CI, 49-63%), respectively. There is no significant difference in local control between treatment to post-operative cavities or intact lesions. Consistent with our earlier report of 44 patients, SIG-RS for treatment of intracranial metastases can produce outcomes comparable to those with conventional frame-based and frameless SRS techniques while providing greater patient comfort with an open-faced mask and fast treatment time.

[1]  Cristina Garibaldi,et al.  Comparison between infrared optical and stereoscopic X-ray technologies for patient setup in image guided stereotactic radiotherapy. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Initial clinical experience with a frameless and maskless stereotactic radiosurgery treatment. , 2012, Practical radiation oncology.

[3]  L D Lunsford,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery plus whole brain radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for patients with multiple brain metastases. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Darren Kahler,et al.  Characterization of a real-time surface image-guided stereotactic positioning system. , 2010, Medical physics.

[5]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for four or more intracranial metastases. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Maria Werner-Wasik,et al.  Whole brain radiation therapy with or without stereotactic radiosurgery boost for patients with one to three brain metastases: phase III results of the RTOG 9508 randomised trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[7]  J Palta,et al.  Systematic analysis of errors in target localization and treatment delivery in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Radiation safety issues with positron‐emission/computed tomography simulation for stereotactic body radiation therapy , 2008, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[9]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Multileaf collimator-based linear accelerator radiosurgery: five-year efficiency analysis. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[10]  J. Roeske,et al.  Predictors of Tumor Control in Patients Treated With Linac-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Metastatic Disease to the Brain , 2005, American journal of clinical oncology.

[11]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Neurocognitive assessment following whole brain radiation therapy and radiosurgery for patients with cerebral metastases , 2013, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[12]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Single-isocenter frameless intensity-modulated stereotactic radiosurgery for simultaneous treatment of multiple brain metastases: clinical experience. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  T. Pajak,et al.  Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Frame-less and mask-less cranial stereotactic radiosurgery: a feasibility study , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  P. Cornu,et al.  Radiosurgery for brain metastasis: impact of CTV on local control. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Hiroki Shirato,et al.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery Plus Whole-Brain Radiation Therapy vs Stereotactic Radiosurgery Alone for Treatment of Brain Metastases: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2007 .

[17]  M. Mehta,et al.  A multi-institutional review of radiosurgery alone vs. radiosurgery with whole brain radiotherapy as the initial management of brain metastases. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  R. Warnick,et al.  Frameless image-guided intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery: clinical outcomes for brain metastases. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75. , 2007, Medical physics.

[20]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Optically-guided frameless linac-based radiosurgery for brain metastases: clinical experience , 2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.