Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) may improve the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE To compare MP-MRI transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-fusion targeted biopsy with routine TRUS-guided random biopsy for overall and clinically significant PCa detection among patients with suspected PCa based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This institutional review board-approved, single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial (April 2011 to December 2014) included 130 biopsy-naive patients referred for prostate biopsy based on PSA values (PSA <20 ng/ml or free-to-total PSA ratio ≤0.15 and PSA <10 ng/ml). Patients were randomized 1:1 to the MP-MRI or control group. Patients in the MP-MRI group underwent prebiopsy MP-MRI followed by 10- to 12-core TRUS-guided random biopsy and cognitive MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy. The control group underwent TRUS-guided random biopsy alone. INTERVENTION MP-MRI 3-T phased-array surface coil. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary outcome was the number of patients with biopsy-proven PCa in the MP-MRI and control groups. Secondary outcome measures included the number of positive prostate biopsies and the proportion of clinically significant PCa in the MP-MRI and control groups. Between-group analyses were performed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 53 and 60 patients were evaluable in the MP-MRI and control groups, respectively. The overall PCa detection rate and the clinically significant cancer detection rate were similar between the MP-MRI and control groups, respectively (64% [34 of 53] vs 57% [34 of 60]; 7.5% difference [95% confidence interval (CI), -10 to 25], p=0.5, and 55% [29 of 53] vs 45% [27 of 60]; 9.7% difference [95% CI, -8.5 to 27], p=0.8). The PCa detection rate was higher than assumed during the planning of this single-center trial. CONCLUSIONS MP-MRI/TRUS-fusion targeted biopsy did not improve PCa detection rate compared with TRUS-guided biopsy alone in patients with suspected PCa based on PSA values. PATIENT SUMMARY In this randomized clinical trial, additional prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before prostate biopsy appeared to offer similar diagnostic accuracy compared with routine transrectal ultrasound-guided random biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Similar numbers of cancers were detected with and without MRI. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01357512.

[1]  P. Pinto,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent MRI/ultrasonography fusion‐guided biopsy increase the detection of anteriorly located prostate cancers , 2014, BJU international.

[2]  Yousef Mazaheri,et al.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2011, Radiology.

[3]  Pierre Mozer,et al.  Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review. , 2015, European urology.

[4]  U. Capitanio,et al.  Testing the most stringent criteria for selection of candidates for active surveillance in patients with low‐risk prostate cancer , 2010, BJU international.

[5]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[6]  B. Carey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. , 2011, European urology.

[7]  Zeike A. Taylor,et al.  MR to ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate interventions , 2012, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Naira Muradyan,et al.  Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[9]  G. Haber,et al.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging before initial biopsy: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging‐targeted and systematic biopsy for significant prostate cancer detection , 2011, BJU international.

[10]  A W Partin,et al.  Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. , 1998, JAMA.

[11]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. , 2014, European urology.

[12]  William J Catalona,et al.  Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Simulated required accuracy of image registration tools for targeting high-grade cancer components with prostate biopsies , 2013, European Radiology.

[14]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of intraprostatic prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2009, Urology.

[15]  M. Terris,et al.  Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. , 1989, The Journal of urology.

[16]  H. Ozen,et al.  An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. , 2004, European urology.

[17]  J. Fütterer,et al.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature. , 2015, European urology.

[18]  J. Fütterer,et al.  Standards of reporting for MRI-targeted biopsy studies (START) of the prostate: recommendations from an International Working Group. , 2013, European urology.

[19]  P. Choyke,et al.  Utility of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging suspicion levels for detecting prostate cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[20]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging‐directed transrectal ultrasonography‐guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer , 2007, BJU international.

[21]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers. , 2012, European urology.

[22]  D. Nieboer,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2015, European urology.

[23]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  A study of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in men with untreated localised prostate cancer on active surveillance. , 2009, European urology.

[24]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. , 2011, Radiology.

[25]  Xavier Leroy,et al.  Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy--prospective multicenter study. , 2013, Radiology.

[26]  M. Stifelman,et al.  A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial. , 2014, European urology.

[27]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Very distal apical prostate tumours: identification on multiparametric MRI at 3 Tesla , 2012, BJU international.

[28]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer managed with active surveillance: role of anatomic MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging. , 2010, Radiology.

[29]  Neil Fleshner,et al.  Impact of multiparametric endorectal coil prostate magnetic resonance imaging on disease reclassification among active surveillance candidates: a prospective cohort study. , 2012, The Journal of urology.

[30]  F. Schröder,et al.  Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. , 2014, European urology.

[31]  P. Carroll,et al.  Pathological outcomes of candidates for active surveillance of prostate cancer. , 2009, The Journal of urology.