Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay.

BACKGROUND The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) has recently been endorsed as a validated alternative to guinea pig methods for the identification of skin sensitization hazard. Nevertheless, there has been some debate regarding the utility of this method for the detection of metal contact allergens. OBJECTIVE In these investigations, we have used the LLNA to determine the skin sensitization potential of 13 metal salts, 8 of which were considered to possess a significant ability to sensitize man, whereas the remaining 5 were judged to lack such potential. RESULTS The predictions from the LLNA were correct for 7 of the 8 (88%) sensitizing metals and for 4 of the 5 (80%) nonsensitizers when considered against the experience of these metals as human skin sensitizers. Thus, the overall predictive accuracy of the LLNA in relation to metals was 11/13 (85%), which is very similar to the accuracy of approximately 88% in relation to a much larger number of low-molecular-weight organic chemicals, as reported previously. CONCLUSION These data provide support for the potential utility of the LLNA in hazard identification of metal contact allergens.

[1]  D. Burrows,et al.  CHROMIUM: METABOLISM AND TOXICITY , 1983, The Ulster Medical Journal.

[2]  D. Basketter,et al.  The local lymph node assay: status of validation. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[3]  R. Menne.  Textbook of Contact Dermatitis , 1995, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[4]  I Kimber,et al.  The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. , 1996, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  J Hilton,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay. , 1995, Methods in molecular biology.

[6]  D. Basketter,et al.  Nickel, cobalt and chromium in consumer products: a role in allergic contact dermatitis? , 1993, Contact dermatitis.

[7]  R. Baer,et al.  The Most Common Contact Allergens , 1973 .

[8]  T. Menné,et al.  Tin: an overlooked contact sensitizer? , 1987, Contact dermatitis.

[9]  I Kimber,et al.  Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes. , 2000, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[10]  D A Basketter,et al.  Classification criteria for skin‐sensitizing chemicals: a commentary , 1999, Contact dermatitis.

[11]  Nguyen Lq,et al.  Reactions to manganese and cadmium in tattoos. , 1979 .

[12]  I Kimber,et al.  A comparison of statistical approaches to the derivation of EC3 values from local lymph node assay dose responses , 1999, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[13]  G. Frank Gerberick,et al.  Examination of the local lymph node assay for use in contact sensitization risk assessment. , 1992 .

[14]  I Kimber,et al.  Strategies for identifying false positive responses in predictive skin sensitization tests. , 1998, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[15]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Temporal stability of local lymph node assay responses to hexyl cinnamic aldehyde , 1998, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[16]  M. Demedts,et al.  Assessment of the sensitization potential of five metal salts in the murine local lymph node assay. , 1997, Toxicology.

[17]  A M Kligman,et al.  The identification of contact allergens by human assay. 3. The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. , 1989, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[18]  J. Fowler.  Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Metals , 1990 .

[19]  Paul Brooker,et al.  Progress in Toxicological Testing: Reduction and Refinement Issues , 1998, Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA.

[20]  R. Scheper,et al.  Oral induction of tolerance to nickel sensitization in mice. , 1993, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[21]  A. Karlberg,et al.  Copper – a rare sensitizer , 1983, Contact dermatitis.