Predicting Evacuation in Two Major Disasters: Risk Perception, Social Influence, and Access to Resources

The complex and somewhat bewildering phenomenon of why people sometimes decide not to evacuate from a dangerous situation is influenced by a combination of individual characteristics and 3 basic social psychological processes: (a) risk perception, (b) social influence, and (c) access to resources. This study used a combined sample of 777 adults interviewed after Hurricanes Hugo and Andrew. Although numerous variables significantly predicted evacuation, much variance in this behavior still remained unexplained. Different population subgroups gave different reasons for not evacuating (e.g., severeness of storm, territoriality). A multifaceted and tailored approach to both individuals and communities is needed; a simple warning is often not enough.

[1]  Fran H. Norris,et al.  In search of altruistic community: Patterns of social support mobilization following Hurricane Hugo , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[2]  Nancy B. Kurland.  Ethical Intentions and the Theories of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior1 , 1995 .

[3]  Earl J. Baker,et al.  Predicting Response to Hurricane Warnings - Reanalysis of Data from 4 Studies , 1979 .

[4]  F. Norris,et al.  Protective function of resources related to life events, global stress, and depression in older adults. , 1984, Journal of health and social behavior.

[5]  J. S. Stephenson,et al.  When Disaster Strikes1 , 1971 .

[6]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  The Effects of Ethnicity on Evacuation Decision-Making , 1991, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[7]  Sheldon Cohen,et al.  Positive Events and Social Supports as Buffers of Life Change Stress , 1983 .

[8]  Y. Rofé,et al.  Stress and affiliation: A utility theory. , 1984 .

[9]  Robert A. Stallings,et al.  Evacuation Behavior at Three Mile Island , 1984, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[10]  Ronald W. Perry,et al.  Evacuation Decision-Making in Natural Disasters , 1979 .

[11]  T. Drabek,et al.  Families in Disaster: Reactions and Relatives , 1968 .

[12]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Social influence and crime-victim decision making. , 1984 .

[13]  F. Norris,et al.  Age differences in the psychological consequences of Hurricane Hugo. , 1993, Psychology and aging.

[14]  Charles E. Fritz,et al.  The Human Being in Disasters: A Research Perspective , 1957 .

[15]  Michael K. Lindell,et al.  The Protective Action Decision Model Applied to Evacuation During the Three Mile Island Crisis , 1984, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[16]  Monique M. Raats,et al.  Including Moral Dimensions of Choice Within the Structure of the Theory of Planned Behavior1 , 1995 .

[17]  Earl J. Baker,et al.  Hurricane Evacuation Behavior , 1991, International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters.

[18]  Neil D. Weinstein,et al.  Testing four competing theories of health-protective behavior. , 1993 .