Metrics to Evaluate The Quality of Motion Compensation Systems in De-interlacing And Up-conversion Applications

Although motion compensation has improved a lot on natural videos, it still fails on sequences with erratic motions or mixed film-video content. This paper presents metrics to evaluate blur, combing artifacts, blockiness, halos and judder that remain typical limitations on such material even with state-of-the-art fallback policies.

[1]  E.B. Bellers,et al.  Solving occlusion in Frame-Rate up-Conversion , 2007, 2007 Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on Consumer Electronics.

[2]  G. Haan,et al.  Robust motion-compensated video upconversion , 1997 .

[3]  Gerard de Haan,et al.  Subjective evaluation of de-interlacing techniques , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Athanasios Leontaris,et al.  Quality Evaluation of Motion-Compensated Edge Artifacts in Compressed Video , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Marina Nicolas Handling of annoying variations of performances in video algorithm optimization , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  Murat Kunt,et al.  Quality assessment of motion rendition in video coding , 1999, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[7]  M. Nicolas,et al.  Low-cost handling of combing artifacts in motion-compensated deinterlacing , 2007, 2007 Digest of Technical Papers International Conference on Consumer Electronics.