When children reflect on their own playing style: experiments with continuator and children

The Continuator project concerns the study of interactive musicalsystems that are able to learn musical styles. The Continuatorsystem was developed with the primary goal of designing new musicalinstruments in the context of improvised music. The strongsubjective impressions created with the use of the system led us toconsider its use in a pedagogical context. This article describesexperiments conducted with the system and 3- to 5-year-oldchildren. We highlight several dimensions of the study pertainingto music education, including attention span, spontaneousdevelopment of playing modes, and capacity to listen analytically.We describe very encouraging preliminary results and stress theimportance of using reflective interactive systems for triggeringmusical interest in children and creating stimulating,nonsupervised music learning environments. We conclude by settingup our research in the context of the theory of flow as an optimalexperience.

[1]  François Pachet,et al.  Experiments with a musical machine: musical style replication in 3 to 5 year old children , 2005, British Journal of Music Education.

[2]  Rafael Morales-Bueno,et al.  Using Multiattribute Prediction Suffix Graphs to Predict and Generate Music , 2001 .

[3]  R. Kurzweil The Age of Spiritual Machines , 1999 .

[4]  David Cope,et al.  Experiments In Musical Intelligence , 1996 .

[5]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[6]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[7]  François Pachet Multimedia at work - Playing with virtual musicians: the continuator in practice , 2002, IEEE MultiMedia.

[8]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits , 1996, INTR.

[9]  Rafael Morales Bueno,et al.  Using Multiattribute Prediction Suffix Graphs to Predict and Generate Music , 2001, Computer Music Journal.

[10]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[11]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  An experiment in musical composition , 1957, IRE Trans. Electron. Comput..

[12]  Joseph A. Paradiso,et al.  The Brain Opera Technology: New Instruments and Gestural Sensors for Musical Interaction and Performance , 1999 .

[13]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[14]  François Pachet Interacting with a Musical Learning System: The Continuator , 2002, ICMAI.

[15]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[16]  Charles F. Hockett,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[17]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Simulating turn-taking behaviours with coupled dynamical recognizers , 2002 .

[18]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[19]  Sidney S. Fels,et al.  Intimacy and embodiment: implications for art and technology , 2000, MULTIMEDIA '00.

[20]  François Pachet,et al.  The Continuator: Musical Interaction With Style , 2003, ICMC.

[21]  Gil Weinberg Expressive Digital Musical Instruments for Children , 1999 .

[22]  F. Kaplan Artificial Attachment : Will a robot ever pass Ainsworth ’ s Strange Situation Test ? , 2001 .