Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression

Abstract In the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) the decision maker makes comparisons between pairs of attributes or alternatives. In real applications the comparisons are subject to judgmental errors. Many AHP-matrices reported in the literature are found to be such that the logarithm of the comparison ratio can be sufficiently well modeled by a normal distribution with a constant variance. On the basis of this model we present the formulae for the evaluation of the standard deviations of the estimates of the AHP-weights obtained by regression analysis. In order to eliminate the effect of an outlier in the comparison ratios a robust regression technique is elaborated, and compared with the eigenvector method and the logarithmic least squares regression. A dissimilarity matrix approach is presented for the statistical simultaneous comparisons of the AHP-weights. The results are illustrated by simulation experiments.

[1]  Luis G. Vargas Reciprocal matrices with random coefficients , 1982 .

[2]  P. Leskinen Measurement scales and scale independence in the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[3]  P. D. Jong A statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for priorities , 1984 .

[4]  J. Fichtner On deriving priority vectors from matrices of pairwise comparisons , 1986 .

[5]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[6]  Ami Arbel,et al.  Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation , 1989 .

[7]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios , 1984 .

[8]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  The analytic network process in energy policy planning , 1986 .

[9]  Ahti Salo Inconsistency analysis by approximately specified priorities , 1993 .

[10]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Uncertainty in Expert Predictions of the Ecological Consequences of Forest Plans , 1996 .

[11]  F. Lootsma SCALE SENSITIVITY IN THE MULTIPLICATIVE AHP AND SMART , 1993 .

[12]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  KNOWING WHAT YOU WANT: MEASURING LABILE VALUES , 1988 .

[13]  Saeed Ghahramani Fundamentals of Probability , 1995 .

[14]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  A probabilistic study of preference structures in the analytic hierarchy process with interval judgments , 1993 .

[15]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[16]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[17]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ratio Statements , 1992, Oper. Res..

[18]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  An Experiment on the Numerical Modelling of Verbal Ratio Statements , 1997 .

[19]  G. Crawford,et al.  A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matrices , 1985 .

[20]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  On the measurement of preferences in the analytic hierarchy process , 1997 .

[21]  Elizabeth A. Peck,et al.  Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis , 2001 .

[22]  R. Hämäläinen,et al.  Preference programming through approximate ratio comparisons , 1995 .

[23]  L. Goddard,et al.  Operations Research (OR) , 2007 .

[24]  H. J. Einhorn,et al.  Cognitive processes in choice and decision behavior , 1979 .

[25]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[26]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and Its Applications , 1966 .

[27]  M. Zahir Incorporating the uncertainty of decision judgements in the analytic hierarchy process , 1991 .

[28]  P. Harker Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[29]  T. L. Saaty A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures , 1977 .

[30]  Rupert G. Miller Simultaneous Statistical Inference , 1966 .

[31]  C. Genest,et al.  A statistical look at Saaty's method of estimating pairwise preferences expressed on a ratio scale , 1994 .

[32]  Jyrki Kangas,et al.  Analyzing uncertainties in experts' opinions of forest plan performance , 1997 .

[33]  C. R. Rao,et al.  Linear Statistical Inference and its Applications , 1968 .