Ultrasound modalities and quantification: developments of multiparametric ultrasonography, a new modality to detect, localize and target prostatic tumors

Purpose of review An imaging tool providing reliable prostate cancer (PCa) detection and localization is necessary to improve the diagnostic pathway with imaging targeted biopsies. This review presents the latest developments in existing and novel ultrasound modalities for the detection and localization of PCa. Recent findings The ultrasound modalities that were very promising on introduction (HistoScanning and Doppler) have shown a wane in performance when tested in larger patient populations. In the meantime, novel ultrasound modalities have emerged in the field of PCa detection. Modalities, such as shear wave elastography (SWE) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) show very promising results. SWE produces an absolute elasticity measure and removes the need for manual compression of the tissue. The former allows comparison between scans and patients, the latter reduces the interoperator variability. Quantification of CEUS enables easily interpretable and accurate imaging of the microvascular changes associated with clinically significant prostate tumors. Summary The novel ultrasound modalities of SWE and CEUS imaging open the door for taking targeted biopsies based on the detection and localization of PCa by these novel modalities. This potentially improves PCa detection wherein significantly reducing the number of biopsy cores.

[1]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Correspondence - Spatiotemporal correlation of ultrasound contrast agent dilution curves for angiogenesis localization by dispersion imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[2]  J. Cho,et al.  Shear Wave Elastography for Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study , 2014, Korean journal of radiology.

[3]  Jie Tang,et al.  Diagnostic performance of contrast enhanced ultrasound in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2013, Academic radiology.

[4]  E. Jung,et al.  First results of endocavity evaluation of the microvascularization of malignant prostate tumors using contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) including perfusion analysis: first results. , 2012, Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation.

[5]  Martijn Smeenge,et al.  Current status of transrectal ultrasound techniques in prostate cancer , 2012, Current opinion in urology.

[6]  B. Beyer,et al.  Does HistoScanning™ predict positive results in prostate biopsy? A retrospective analysis of 1,188 sextants of the prostate , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[7]  R. Memo,et al.  Shear Wave Ultrasound Elastography of the Prostate: Initial Results , 2012, Ultrasound quarterly.

[8]  S. Shariat,et al.  Innovations in diagnostic imaging of localized prostate cancer , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[9]  Werner Jaschke,et al.  Value of enhanced transrectal ultrasound targeted biopsy for prostate cancer diagnosis: a retrospective data analysis , 2012, World Journal of Urology.

[10]  Juan Huang,et al.  Real-time elastography in the diagnosis of patients suspected of having prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2014, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  Yunkai Zhu,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Ultrasonography for the Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: a Preliminary Study , 2009, Korean journal of radiology.

[12]  Hessel Wijkstra,et al.  The value of dynamic contrast enhanced power Doppler ultrasound imaging in the localization of prostate cancer. , 2003, European urology.

[13]  M. Brock,et al.  Multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate: adding contrast enhanced ultrasound to real-time elastography to detect histopathologically confirmed cancer. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Wenmiao Shu,et al.  Elasticity as a biomarker for prostate cancer: a systematic review , 2014, BJU international.

[15]  Johan Braeckman,et al.  Detection, localisation and characterisation of prostate cancer by Prostate HistoScanning™ , 2012, BJU international.

[16]  P. Scardino,et al.  What is still needed to make focal therapy an accepted segment of standard therapy? , 2014, Current opinion in urology.

[17]  Samir S Taneja,et al.  Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing. , 2013, The Journal of urology.

[18]  M. Mischi,et al.  Contrast-ultrasound dispersion imaging for prostate cancer localization by improved spatiotemporal similarity analysis. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  T. Tzai,et al.  Doppler spectral waveform parameters at neurovascular bundle vessels in patients with prostate biopsy. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[20]  C. Stief,et al.  Contrast-enhanced transrectal ultrasound (CE-TRUS) with cadence-contrast pulse sequence (CPS) technology for the identification of prostate cancer. , 2011, Urologic oncology.

[21]  R. Laing,et al.  Does prostate HistoScanning™ play a role in detecting prostate cancer in routine clinical practice? Results from three independent studies , 2014, BJU international.

[22]  Markus Graefen,et al.  Shear wave elastography for localization of prostate cancer lesions and assessment of elasticity thresholds: implications for targeted biopsies and active surveillance protocols. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[23]  Johan Braeckman,et al.  The accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography supplemented with computer‐aided ultrasonography for detecting small prostate cancers , 2008, BJU international.

[24]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Contrast-Ultrasound Diffusion Imaging for Localization of Prostate Cancer , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[26]  B. Fornage,et al.  Soft-tissue changes in the hand in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation with US. , 1989, Radiology.

[27]  M. Arditi,et al.  REAL-TIME CONTRAST-ENHANCED ULTRASOUND PARAMETRIC IMAGING IN PROSTATE , 2009 .

[28]  Johan Braeckman,et al.  Computer‐aided ultrasonography (HistoScanning): a novel technology for locating and characterizing prostate cancer , 2008, BJU international.

[29]  T. H. van der Kwast,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013. , 2014, European urology.

[30]  W. Willinek,et al.  Combination of C-TRUS with multiparametric MRI: potential for improving detection of prostate cancer , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[31]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Contrast-ultrasound dispersion imaging of cancer neovascularization by mutual-information analysis , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium.

[32]  M. Mischi,et al.  Angiogenesis imaging by spatiotemporal analysis of ultrasound contrast agent dispersion kinetics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[33]  N. Salem,et al.  Comparison of image-guided targeted biopsies versus systematic randomized biopsies in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic literature review of well-designed studies , 2014, World Journal of Urology.

[34]  M Arditi,et al.  Perfusion Quantification in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) – Ready for Research Projects and Routine Clinical Use , 2012, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[35]  Tomy Varghese,et al.  Transrectal quantitative shear wave elastography in the detection and characterisation of prostate cancer , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[36]  J. Gorce,et al.  Influence of Bubble Size Distribution on the Echogenicity of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: A Study of SonoVue™ , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[37]  N. Nader,et al.  Value of transrectal power Doppler sonography in the detection of low-risk prostate cancers. , 2013, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[38]  E J Halpern,et al.  Using gray-scale and color and power Doppler sonography to detect prostatic cancer. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[39]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  1054 Prostate cancer localization by contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging: Results from a pilot study , 2014 .

[40]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Novel contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging in prostate cancer , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[41]  M. Stöckle,et al.  Artificial neural network analysis (ANNA) of prostatic transrectal ultrasound , 1999, The Prostate.

[42]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: onset, progression and imaging , 2012, BJU international.