Is open-loop recycling the lowest preference in a circular economy? Answering through LCA of glass powder in concrete

Abstract The government of Quebec (Canada) is trying to find a useful outlet for the mixed waste glass pilling up in its landfills. One solution to consider is the use of fine glass powder from mixed waste glass as alternative cementitious materials (ACM) in concrete, using an open-loop circular-economy principle. To quantify the environmental feasibility of this concept, life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, in combination with a real case study (i.e., a concrete sidewalk in Montreal, Canada) are both assessed. More specifically, two different scenarios are compared, the business-as-usual (BAU) concrete production model, and a glass powder (GP) concrete production process model. All modeling efforts are performed using SimaPro 8.2 software, the Ecoinvent 3.2 database and the IMPACT 2002 + impact method. Finally, a Monte Carlo simulation, in addition to different sensitivity analyses, are carried out to assess the influence of data uncertainty and key parameter changes, such as the distance from suppliers, potential lifetime extension of the concrete, and possible particulate emissions during GP production. Results show the environmental benefits of using GP as an ACM in terms of every indicator. Moreover, the significant contribution of cement production in the environmental burden of concrete is noted. It appears as the main hotspot in most midpoint indicators, and in all four endpoint indicators. It is especially highlighted as a global warming indicator, with 74% of the greenhouse gasses (GHG) related to cement production for the BAU scenario and 68% for the GP scenario. The emissions of particles into the atmosphere (such as CO2, NOx, and SOx) from the clinker kiln chimney plays a major role in the overall environmental impact of concrete production. Another key result is the importance of transportation distance of the base materials, which could reverse the conclusion. The originality of this paper relies on the environmental assessment of the up-cycling of GP as a supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) in concrete. Indeed, this study allows for a better understanding of environmental impact of concrete and highlights the extent to which environmental benefits remain when mixed waste glass is used in an open-loop circular-economy context. At a larger scale, this study aims to encourage all municipalities/government that are struggling with common waste – such as mixed waste glass -- to find industrial symbioses at a local scale.

[1]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Do We Have the Right Performance Indicators for the Circular Economy?: Insight into the Swiss Waste Management System , 2017 .

[2]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[3]  Costas A. Velis,et al.  Metrics for optimising the multi-dimensional value of resources recovered from waste in a circular economy: A critical review , 2017 .

[4]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  The application of the pedigree approach to the distributions foreseen in ecoinvent v3 , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[5]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Environmental optimization of concrete sidewalks in urban areas , 2009 .

[6]  Yixin Shao,et al.  Studies on concrete containing ground waste glass , 2000 .

[7]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[8]  R. Veldhuijzen Van Zanten Geotextiles and geomembranes in civil engineering. , 1986 .

[9]  Weslynne Ashton,et al.  Industrial Symbiosis at the Facility Scale , 2017 .

[10]  P. Van den Heede,et al.  Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations , 2012 .

[11]  Jane C. Bare,et al.  TRACI 2.0: the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts 2.0 , 2011 .

[12]  F. Blomsma,et al.  The Emergence of Circular Economy: A New Framing Around Prolonging Resource Productivity , 2017 .

[13]  Neil Hirst,et al.  Buildings and Climate Change , 2013 .

[14]  Darli Rodrigues Vieira,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the manufacturing of common and ecological concrete: A review , 2016 .

[15]  Duncan Herfort,et al.  Sustainable Development and Climate Change Initiatives , 2008 .

[16]  Narayanan Neithalath,et al.  Influence of a fine glass powder on the durability characteristics of concrete and its comparison to fly ash , 2008 .

[17]  C. Tsiliyannis Industrial Wastes and By‐products as Alternative Fuels in Cement Plants: Evaluation of an Industrial Symbiosis Option , 2018 .

[18]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Planning strategies for promoting environmentally suitable pedestrian pavements in cities , 2012 .

[19]  Joan Rieradevall,et al.  Life cycle assessment of granite application in sidewalks , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  E. Hultink,et al.  The Circular Economy - A New Sustainability Paradigm? , 2017 .

[21]  J. Bare,et al.  Development of normalization factors for Canada and the United States and comparison with European factors. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  Steven De Meester,et al.  The recyclability benefit rate of closed-loop and open-loop systems: a case study on plastic recycling in Flanders , 2015 .

[23]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review , 2014 .

[24]  Bo Pedersen Weidema,et al.  Data quality management for life cycle inventories—an example of using data quality indicators☆ , 1996 .

[25]  C. Meyer The greening of the concrete industry , 2009 .

[26]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Product Carbon Footprints and Their Uncertainties in Comparative Decision Contexts , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  Arezki Tagnit-Hamou,et al.  Pozzolanic properties of fine and coarse color-mixed glass cullet , 2011 .

[28]  Melanie Haupt,et al.  How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016 , 2017, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[29]  Glen P. Peters,et al.  Efficient algorithms for Life Cycle Assessment, Input-Output Analysis, and Monte-Carlo Analysis , 2007 .

[30]  A. Tagnit-Hamou,et al.  Effect of Glass Powder on Concrete Sustainability , 2017 .

[31]  Mourad Ben Amor,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment of beverage packaging systems: focus on the collection of post-consumer bottles , 2016 .

[32]  Narayanan Neithalath,et al.  Influence of a Fine Glass Powder on Cement Hydration: Comparison to Fly Ash and Modeling the Degree of Hydration , 2008 .