Effects of Complementary Auditory Feedback in Robot-Assisted Lower Extremity Motor Adaptation

This study investigates how complementary auditory feedback may affect short-term gait modifications induced by four training sessions with a robotic exoskeleton. Healthy subjects walked on a treadmill and were instructed to match a modified gait pattern derived from their natural one, while receiving assistance by the robot (kinetic guidance). The main question we wanted to answer is whether the most commonly used combination of feedback (i.e., haptic and visual) could be either enhanced by adding auditory feedback or successfully substituted with a combination of kinetic guidance and auditory feedback. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups, all of which received kinetic guidance. The control group received additional visual feedback, while the three experimental groups were each provided with a different modality of auditory feedback. The third experimental group also received the same visual feedback as the control group. Differences among the training modalities in gait kinematics, timing and symmetry were assessed in three post-training sessions.

[1]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[2]  J. H. Zar,et al.  Biostatistical Analysis (5th Edition) , 1984 .

[3]  U. Nayak,et al.  The effect of age on variability in gait. , 1984, Journal of gerontology.

[4]  T. Ifukube,et al.  A blind mobility aid modeled after echolocation of bats , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  W.J. Tompkins,et al.  Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Richard A. Brand,et al.  The biomechanics and motor control of human gait: Normal, elderly, and pathological , 1992 .

[7]  Peter B. L. Meijer,et al.  An experimental system for auditory image representations , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  G. Crombez,et al.  Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[9]  S. Hesse,et al.  Gait pattern of severely disabled hemiparetic subjects on a new controlled gait trainer as compared to assisted treadmill walking with partial body weight support , 1999, Clinical rehabilitation.

[10]  M. Thaut,et al.  The connection between rhythmicity and brain function , 1999, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[11]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[12]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  F. Prince,et al.  Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review. , 2000, Gait & posture.

[14]  M. Thaut,et al.  Kinematic optimization of spatiotemporal patterns in paretic arm training with stroke patients , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  Perry R. Cook,et al.  Real Sound Synthesis for Interactive Applications , 2002 .

[16]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Musical motor feedback (MMF) in walking hemiparetic stroke patients: randomized trials of gait improvement , 2003, Clinical rehabilitation.

[17]  M. Suteerawattananon,et al.  Effects of visual and auditory cues on gait in individuals with Parkinson's disease , 2004, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[18]  S. Perry,et al.  Stroke Rehabilitation: Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill , 2004 .

[19]  Van Peppen,et al.  The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke : what ’ s the evidence ? , 2004 .

[20]  S. Prentice,et al.  Adaptation to unilateral change in lower limb mechanical properties during human walking , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  Davide Rocchesso,et al.  Continuous sonic feedback from a rolling ball , 2005, IEEE MultiMedia.

[22]  Jörg Krüger,et al.  HapticWalker---a novel haptic foot device , 2005, TAP.

[23]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  Jonathan Berger,et al.  THE SOUND OF ONE ARM SWINGING: A MODEL FOR MULTIDIMENSIONAL AUDITORY DISPLAY OF PHYSICAL MOTION , 2006 .

[25]  Yukio Iwaya,et al.  COGNITIVE-MAP FORMATION OF BLIND PERSONS IN A VIRTUAL SOUND ENVIRONMENT , 2006 .

[26]  Reymond Clavel,et al.  The WalkTrainer: A Robotic System for Walking Rehabilitation , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[27]  S.J. Harkema,et al.  A Robot and Control Algorithm That Can Synchronously Assist in Naturalistic Motion During Body-Weight-Supported Gait Training Following Neurologic Injury , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Repetitive Task Training for Improving Functional Ability After Stroke , 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[29]  J.A. Galvez,et al.  Some Key Problems for Robot-Assisted Movement Therapy Research: A Perspective from the University of California at Irvine , 2007, 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[30]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  A Powered Leg Orthosis for Gait Rehabilitation of Motor-Impaired Patients , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[31]  J. Veneman Design and evaluation of the gait rehabilitation robot LOPES , 2007 .

[32]  Robert Riener,et al.  A Study on Sound Feedback in a Virtual Environment for Gait Rehabilitation , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[33]  Kurt A. Thoroughman,et al.  Divided attention impairs human motor adaptation but not feedback control. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX) , 2009, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[35]  Robert Riener,et al.  Evaluation of Visual and Auditory Feedback in Virtual Obstacle Walking , 2008, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[36]  Jeffrey D. Riley,et al.  Neuroplasticity and brain repair after stroke , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[37]  Jan F. Veneman,et al.  The Effects on Kinematics and Muscle Activity of Walking in a Robotic Gait Trainer During Zero-Force Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[38]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  The role of executive function and attention in gait , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[39]  A. Mirelman,et al.  Effects of Training With a Robot-Virtual Reality System Compared With a Robot Alone on the Gait of Individuals After Stroke , 2009, Stroke.

[40]  Vincent S. Huang,et al.  Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[41]  S. Hesse,et al.  Connecting research to the needs of patients and clinicians , 2009, Brain Research Bulletin.

[42]  Federico Avanzini,et al.  Integrating auditory feedback in motor rehabilitation systems , 2009 .

[43]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Multiple Comparison Procedures , 2009 .

[44]  Peter J Beek,et al.  Rhythm Perturbations in Acoustically Paced Treadmill Walking After Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[45]  T Bajd,et al.  Comparison of visual and haptic feedback during training of lower extremities. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[46]  Kara K. Patterson,et al.  Evaluation of gait symmetry after stroke: a comparison of current methods and recommendations for standardization. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[47]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Effect of visual distraction and auditory feedback on patient effort during robot-assisted movement training after stroke , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[48]  Brett Stevens,et al.  Sounding better: fast audio cues increase walk speed in treadmill-mediated virtual rehabilitation environments. , 2010, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[49]  G. Rosati The place of robotics in post-stroke rehabilitation , 2010, Expert review of medical devices.

[50]  Robert Riener,et al.  Locomotor training in subjects with sensori-motor deficits: An overview of the robotic gait orthosis lokomat , 2010 .

[51]  Elizabeth A. Brackbill,et al.  Robot-assisted modifications of gait in healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Robert Riener,et al.  Controlling patient participation during robot-assisted gait training , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[53]  Michael H. Thaut,et al.  Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation in Rehabilitation of Movement Disorders: A Review Of Current Research , 2010 .

[54]  Sungjin Hong,et al.  A Review of New Analytic Techniques for Quantifying Symmetry in Locomotion , 2010, Symmetry.

[55]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Virtual reality for gait training: can it induce motor learning to enhance complex walking and reduce fall risk in patients with Parkinson's disease? , 2011, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[56]  Jin-Seop Kim,et al.  Visual and kinesthetic locomotor imagery training integrated with auditory step rhythm for walking performance of patients with chronic stroke , 2011, Clinical rehabilitation.

[57]  M. Hove Interactive Rhythmic Auditory Stimulation reinstates natural 1/f structure in gait of Parkinson’s patients , 2011 .

[58]  D. Mozaffarian,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2011, Circulation.

[59]  Sunil K. Agrawal,et al.  Design of a minimally constraining, passively supported gait training exoskeleton: ALEX II , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[60]  S. Masiero,et al.  Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[61]  Joseph Hidler,et al.  Role of Robotics in Neurorehabilitation. , 2011, Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation.

[62]  Simone Spagnol,et al.  Effect of task-related continuous auditory feedback during learning of tracking motion exercises , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[63]  Paulina J. M. Bank,et al.  Walking to the beat of different drums: practical implications for the use of acoustic rhythms in gait rehabilitation. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[64]  Ronald N. Goodman,et al.  Neural decoding of treadmill walking from noninvasive electroencephalographic signals. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[65]  Ajitkumar P. Mulavara,et al.  Gait training improves performance in healthy adults exposed to novel sensory discordant conditions , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[66]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Substituting auditory for visual feedback to adapt to altered dynamic and kinematic environments during reaching , 2012, Experimental Brain Research.

[67]  Kate E. Webster,et al.  Rhythmic auditory cueing to improve walking in patients with neurological conditions other than Parkinson’s disease – what is the evidence? , 2013, Disability and rehabilitation.

[68]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Design: Exploring the Effect of the Anterior Lunge Degree of Freedom , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.