Discovery Learning in Kindergarten Mathematics.

The discovery learning hypothesis, when applied to mathematical concepts, suggests that if subjects are presented with learning situations where they may derive for themselves the rules or principles to be learned, they will learn better, retain the learning longer, and more readily transfer their learning to new situations. In most cases, the advantages of the discovery method have been thought to be mediated through motivational variables or through sets established during previous experience in learning situations. Bruner (1961), for example, believes that such methods arouse one's competence motivation. Kendler (1966) states that discovery methods should be superior because they cause the learner to structure his experience in his own language patterns. Kagan (1966), referring to Festinger's cognitive dissonance theory, suggests that discovery learners are most rewarded by their learning because they work hard to achieve it. Ausubel (1963, p. 144), although a staunch defender of expository teaching, agrees that under certain conditions discovery methods should be somewhat superior because of the motivation and effort that may be associated with them. Whether a student's motivation is involved has seldom been evaluated

[1]  J. Bruner The act of discovery. , 1961 .

[2]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Generalizability of scores influenced by multiple sources of variance , 1965, Psychometrika.

[3]  Bert Y. Kersh The adequacy of "meaning" as an explanation for the superiority of learning by independent discovery. , 1958 .

[4]  B. Rothenberg CONSERVATION OF NUMBER AMONG FOUR- AND FIVE-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN: SOME METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS , 1969 .

[5]  Robert C. Craig,et al.  The transfer value of guided learning , 1953 .

[6]  G. Gruen Experiences affecting the development of number conservation in children. , 1965, Child development.

[7]  J. Piaget,et al.  Child's Conception Of Geometry , 1960 .

[8]  M. Wittrock Effect of certain instructions upon conceptually mediated learning. , 1963 .

[9]  H. Bellin Learning and operational convergence in logical thought development , 1965 .

[10]  J. Wohlwill,et al.  Experimental analysis of the development of the conservation of number. , 1962, Child development.

[11]  E. Keislar,et al.  Learning by discovery : a critical appraisal , 1969 .

[12]  R. Sprott,et al.  INDUCING NUMBER CONSERVATION IN CHILDREN. , 1964, Child development.

[13]  Bert Y. Kersh,et al.  Learning by Discovery: An Interpretation of Recent Research , 1962 .

[14]  R. Craig Directed versus independent discovery of established relations. , 1956 .

[15]  R. Gagne Conditions of Learning , 1965 .

[16]  Willis E. Ray Pupil Discovery vs. Direct Instruction , 1961 .

[17]  H. Zimiles,et al.  The development of conservation and differentiation of number. , 1966, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[18]  J. Krumboltz,et al.  The Comparative Effects of Inductive and Deductive Sequences in Programed Instruction* , 1965 .

[19]  Bert Y. Kersh The motivating effect of learning by directed discovery. , 1962 .

[20]  G. M. Haslerud,et al.  The transfer value of given and individually derived principles. , 1958 .

[21]  Martin Sylvester Wolfe Effects of Expository Instruction in Mathematics on Students Accustomed to Discovery Methods , 1963 .

[22]  D. Ausubel The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. , 1963 .