Computing gradient-based stepwise benchmarking paths
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Lei Fang. Centralized resource allocation based on efficiency analysis for step-by-step improvement paths , 2015 .
[2] Juan Aparicio,et al. The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure: Comment , 2010, Math. Comput. Model..
[3] Sungmook Lim,et al. Method of Benchmarking Route Choice Based on the Input Similarity Using DEA , 2011 .
[4] Peter Nijkamp,et al. A stepwise-projection data envelopment analysis for public transport operations in Japan , 2011 .
[5] Song Jin Yu,et al. Benchmark optimization and attribute identification for improvement of container terminals , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[6] W. Cooper,et al. Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .
[7] Sebastián Lozano,et al. Gradual technical and scale efficiency improvement in DEA , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..
[8] Joe Zhu,et al. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver , 2002 .
[9] William W. Cooper,et al. Handbook on data envelopment analysis , 2011 .
[10] Juan Aparicio,et al. Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA , 2007 .
[11] H. Welsch,et al. Meaningful environmental indices: a social choice approach , 2004 .
[12] Song Jin Yu,et al. Performance based stratification and clustering for benchmarking of container terminals , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..
[13] Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al. A new look at measuring sustainability of industrial parks: a two-stage data envelopment analysis approach , 2014, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.
[14] Sungmook Lim,et al. A DEA-BASED METHOD OF STEPWISE BENCHMARK TARGET SELECTION WITH PREFERENCE, DIRECTION AND SIMILARITY CRITERIA , 2012 .
[15] Juan Aparicio,et al. Estimating and decomposing overall inefficiency by determining the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in data envelopment analysis , 2020, Oper. Res..
[16] Laurens Cherchye,et al. A comment on multi-stage DEA methodology , 2001, Oper. Res. Lett..
[17] Juan Aparicio,et al. A survey on measuring efficiency through the determination of the least distance in data envelopment analysis , 2016 .
[18] Alexander Vaninsky,et al. Data envelopment analysis with a single DMU: A graphic projected-gradient approach , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[19] Juan Aparicio,et al. The directional profit efficiency measure: on why profit inefficiency is either technical or allocative , 2013 .
[20] Sebastián Lozano,et al. Determining a sequence of targets in DEA , 2005, J. Oper. Res. Soc..
[21] Juan Aparicio,et al. A well-defined efficiency measure for dealing with closest targets in DEA , 2013, Appl. Math. Comput..
[22] Juan Aparicio,et al. Decomposing technical inefficiency using the principle of least action , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[23] Juan Aparicio,et al. The determination of the least distance to the strongly efficient frontier in Data Envelopment Analysis oriented models: Modelling and computational aspects ☆ , 2016 .
[24] Loo Hay Lee,et al. A study on the selection of benchmarking paths in DEA , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..
[25] Timo Kuosmanen. Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis with Undesirable Outputs , 2005 .
[26] Chulwoo Baek,et al. The relevance of DEA benchmarking information and the Least-Distance Measure , 2009, Math. Comput. Model..
[27] Sebastián Lozano,et al. Dominance network analysis of economic efficiency , 2017, Expert Syst. Appl..
[28] J. Pastor,et al. On how to properly calculate the Euclidean distance-based measure in DEA , 2014 .
[29] Si-Il Sung,et al. Integrated Approach to Construction of Benchmarking Network in DEA-Based Stepwise Benchmark Target Selection , 2016 .
[30] Alireza Amirteimoori,et al. A Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2010 .
[31] Juan Aparicio,et al. Closest targets and strong monotonicity on the strongly efficient frontier in DEA , 2014 .
[32] Patrick T. Harker,et al. Projections Onto Efficient Frontiers: Theoretical and Computational Extensions to DEA , 1999 .
[33] Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al. Monotonicity of minimum distance inefficiency measures for Data Envelopment Analysis , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[34] L. Seiford,et al. Context-dependent data envelopment analysis—Measuring attractiveness and progress , 2003 .
[35] E Thanassoulis,et al. Developing a decomposable measure of profit efficiency using DEA , 2007, J. Oper. Res. Soc..
[36] Han Kook Hong,et al. Evaluating the efficiency of system integration projects using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and machine learning , 1999 .
[37] Young Ae Kim,et al. A method of stepwise benchmarking for inefficient DMUs based on the proximity-based target selection , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..
[38] Atsuhiko Kai,et al. LEAST DISTANCE BASED INEFFICIENCY MEASURES ON THE PARETO-EFFICIENT FRONTIER IN DEA , 2012 .
[39] Sungmook Lim,et al. An Optimization Approach to the Construction of a Sequence of Benchmark Targets in DEA-Based Benchmarking , 2014 .
[40] Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al. Finding Closest Targets in Non-Oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies , 2003 .
[41] Eduardo González,et al. From efficiency measurement to efficiency improvement: The choice of a relevant benchmark , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[42] Sungmook Lim,et al. Stepwise Benchmarking Path Selection in DEA , 2012 .
[43] Sebastián Lozano,et al. A two-stage DEA approach for quantifying and analysing the inefficiency of conventional and organic rain-fed cereals in Spain , 2017 .
[44] Diego Prior,et al. A learning ladder toward efficiency: Proposing network-based stepwise benchmark selection , 2016 .
[45] Laurens Cherchye,et al. An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .