Nivolumab Alone and With Ipilimumab in Previously Treated Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: CheckMate 032 Nivolumab 1 mg/kg Plus Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Expansion Cohort Results.

PURPOSE CheckMate 032 is an open-label, multicohort study that includes patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with nivolumab 3 mg/kg monotherapy every 2 weeks (NIVO3), nivolumab 3 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (NIVO3+IPI1), or nivolumab 1 mg/kg plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses followed by nivolumab monotherapy 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks (NIVO1+IPI3). We report on the expanded NIVO1+IPI3 cohort and extended follow-up for the NIVO3 and NIVO3+IPI1 cohorts. METHODS Patients with platinum-pretreated mUC were enrolled in this phase I/II multicenter study to receive NIVO3, NIVO3+IPI1, or NIVO1+IPI3 until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, including duration of response. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were treated with NIVO3 (minimum follow-up, 37.7 months), 104 with NIVO3+IPI1 (minimum follow-up, 38.8 months), and 92 with NIVO1+IPI3 (minimum follow-up, 7.9 months). Objective response rate was 25.6%, 26.9%, and 38.0% in the NIVO3, NIVO3+IPI1, and NIVO1+IPI3 arms, respectively. Median duration of response was more than 22 months in all arms. Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 21 (26.9%), 32 (30.8%), and 36 (39.1%) patients treated with NIVO3, NIVO3+IPI1, and NIVO1+IPI3, respectively. Grade 5 treatment-related pneumonitis occurred in one patient each in the NIVO3 and NIVO3+IPI1 arms. CONCLUSION With longer follow-up, NIVO3 demonstrated sustained antitumor activity alone and in combination with ipilimumab. NIVO1+IPI3 provided the greatest antitumor activity of all regimens, with a manageable safety profile. This result not only supports additional study of NIVO1+IPI3 in mUC, but demonstrates the potential benefit of immunotherapy combinations in this disease.

[1]  T. Powles,et al.  Abstract CT031: Updated efficacy and safety profile of durvalumab monotherapy in urothelial carcinoma , 2018, Clinical Trials.

[2]  E. Plimack,et al.  Abstract CT178: Nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma: Efficacy and safety update and association between biomarkers and overall survival in CheckMate 275 , 2018, Clinical Trials.

[3]  J. Szustakowski,et al.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Lung Cancer with a High Tumor Mutational Burden , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Bohuslav Melichar,et al.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  P. Hegde,et al.  Atezolizumab versus chemotherapy in patients with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor211): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised controlled trial , 2018, The Lancet.

[6]  S. Culine,et al.  Two-year follow-up from the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial of pembrolizumab (pembro) vs investigator’s choice (paclitaxel, docetaxel, or vinflunine) in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer (UC). , 2018 .

[7]  D. Jäger,et al.  Nivolumab monotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma: Longer-term efficacy and safety results from the CheckMate 032 study. , 2018 .

[8]  A. Ravaud,et al.  Avelumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum failure (JAVELIN Solid Tumor): pooled results from two expansion cohorts of an open-label, phase 1 trial. , 2018, The Lancet Oncology.

[9]  Nicholas J. Vogelzang,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Updated Results From a Phase 1/2 Open-label Study , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[10]  D. Schadendorf,et al.  Overall Survival with Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Melanoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  J. Desai,et al.  Nivolumab in patients with metastatic DNA mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer (CheckMate 142): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[12]  E. Plimack,et al.  Nivolumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma after platinum therapy (CheckMate 275): a multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial. , 2017, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  S. Culine,et al.  Pembrolizumab as Second‐Line Therapy for Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  P. Sharma,et al.  Nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent metastatic urothelial carcinoma (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2 trial , 2016, The Lancet. Oncology.

[15]  Jedd D. Wolchok,et al.  The future of cancer treatment: immunomodulation, CARs and combination immunotherapy , 2016, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[16]  P. Sharma,et al.  Nivolumab monotherapy in recurrent metastatic urothelial carcinoma (CheckMate 032): a multicentre, open-label, two-stage, multi-arm, phase 1/2 trial , 2016 .

[17]  S. Urakami,et al.  Impact of C‐reactive protein kinetics on survival of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated by second‐line chemotherapy with gemcitabine, etoposide and cisplatin , 2012, BJU international.

[18]  Ron Brookmeyer,et al.  A Confidence Interval for the Median Survival Time , 1982 .

[19]  E. S. Pearson,et al.  THE USE OF CONFIDENCE OR FIDUCIAL LIMITS ILLUSTRATED IN THE CASE OF THE BINOMIAL , 1934 .