MR imaging of the breast.

The results of clinical investigation suggest that MR imaging can provide clinically important information that cannot be obtained with conventional imaging methods, and that this modality will, in the future, be an invaluable adjunctive breast imaging tool just as breast ultrasound is today. MR imaging appears to be the most accurate method for the detection of implant failure, and although it is the most costly of the available implant imaging techniques, it may be the study of choice when there is a question of implant integrity that cannot be answered with conventional methods. MR imaging as a method to detect, diagnose, and stage breast cancer remains in the investigational stage. The specificity of MR imaging appears limited because of the overlap in the enhancement kinetics and morphologic appearance of benign and malignant lesions. In selected cases, the identification of certain morphologic features, such as internal septations or the absence of enhancement, may be used to classify a lesion as benign, offering an alternative to percutaneous or excisional biopsy. MR imaging appears to be very sensitive for the visualization of both invasive carcinoma and DCIS. Perhaps most important, MR imaging can detect invasive and noninvasive breast carcinoma that is both mammographically and clinically occult, offering the potential for more accurate breast cancer staging and optimized treatment planning. MR imaging is emerging as perhaps the most promising imaging modality for breast cancer detection to date. Published results, however, are from studies with relatively small numbers of patients. The results of these studies should be validated in a large-scale clinical trial before MR imaging is implemented clinically, outside of research settings. This type of clinical investigation is needed to define the technical requirements for optimal imaging, to define interpretation criteria, to develop accurate MR imaging guided localization and biopsy systems, to define the clinical indications for which MR imaging should be used as an adjunct to conventional imaging methods, and to address the issue of cost-effectiveness. One such trial, an international, multi-institutional study funded by the National Cancer Institute, is presently underway.

[1]  S G Orel,et al.  Differentiating benign from malignant enhancing lesions identified at MR imaging of the breast: are time-signal intensity curves an accurate predictor? , 1999, Radiology.

[2]  M. Taupitz,et al.  Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[3]  R. J. Jackman,et al.  Stereotaxic large-core needle biopsy of 450 nonpalpable breast lesions with surgical correlation in lesions with cancer or atypical hyperplasia. , 1994, Radiology.

[4]  N M Hylton,et al.  Imaging techniques for breast MR imaging. , 1994, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.

[5]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[6]  G Lutterbey,et al.  Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. , 1997, Radiology.

[7]  E Grabbe,et al.  MR-guided biopsy of suspect breast lesions with a simple stereotaxic add-on-device for surface coils. , 1994, Radiology.

[8]  M D Schnall,et al.  Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. , 1995, Radiology.

[9]  H Requardt,et al.  Prototype Breast Coil for MR‐Guided Needle Localization , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  L W Bassett,et al.  Silicone breast implants: US evaluation. , 1993, Radiology.

[11]  L. Bassett,et al.  Linguine sign at MR imaging: does it represent the collapsed silicone implant shell? , 1994, Radiology.

[12]  L. Kalisher,et al.  Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1995, Radiology.

[13]  C. Claussen,et al.  Menstrual cycle and age: influence on parenchymal contrast medium enhancement in MR imaging of the breast. , 1997, Radiology.

[14]  L J van Erning,et al.  MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. , 1994, Radiology.

[15]  R. Gilles,et al.  Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. , 1995, Radiology.

[16]  L W Bassett,et al.  Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. , 1992, Radiology.

[17]  M D Schnall,et al.  Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. , 1997, Radiology.

[18]  S. Heywang,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. , 1989, Radiology.

[19]  A. Stillman,et al.  Diagnosis of breast implant rupture: imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  A. Stavros,et al.  US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. , 1993, Radiology.

[21]  H Mumtaz,et al.  Staging of symptomatic primary breast cancer with MR imaging. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  Gorczyca Dp MR imaging of breast implants. , 1994 .

[23]  K. Hopper,et al.  Nonpalpable breast lesions: stereotactic automated large-core biopsies. , 1991, Radiology.

[24]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[25]  L L Fajardo,et al.  Breast cancer diagnosis in women with subglandular silicone gel-filled augmentation implants. , 1995, Radiology.

[26]  K M Harris,et al.  Silicone implant rupture: detection with US. , 1993, Radiology.

[27]  I Tocino,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. , 1997, Radiology.

[28]  C K Kuhl,et al.  Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localization and biopsy device. , 1997, Radiology.

[29]  L. Liberman,et al.  US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. , 1998, Radiology.

[30]  E. Zerhouni,et al.  Single- and double- lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria. , 1995, Radiology.

[31]  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Augmented Breast and Breast Tumors , 1996 .

[32]  J E Kuhlman,et al.  Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography. , 1993, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[33]  L. Bassett,et al.  MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone-gel implants: spectrum of findings. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[34]  M. Schnall,et al.  High-resolution MR imaging of the breast: clinical context. , 1996, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[35]  J M Pruneda,et al.  MR imaging in the management before surgery of lobular carcinoma of the breast: correlation with pathology. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[36]  M. Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1997, Radiology.

[37]  J W Sayre,et al.  Silicone breast implant ruptures in an animal model: comparison of mammography, MR imaging, US, and CT. , 1994, Radiology.

[38]  O Lucidarme,et al.  Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. , 1994, Radiology.

[39]  M D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging-guided localization and biopsy of breast lesions: initial experience. , 1994, Radiology.

[40]  D. Kopans,et al.  Preoperative imaging-guided needle placement and localization of clinically occult breast lesions. , 1989, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  S. Edge,et al.  Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. , 1995, Radiology.

[42]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. , 1996, Radiology.

[43]  M D Schnall,et al.  Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. , 1997, Radiology.

[44]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.

[45]  P. Kornguth,et al.  Complex radial folds versus subtle signs of intracapsular rupture of breast implants: MR findings with surgical correlation. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[46]  D. Fraker,et al.  Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy. , 1997, Radiology.

[47]  M D Schnall,et al.  Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1994, Radiology.

[48]  G. Brody Fact and fiction about breast implant "bleed". , 1977, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[49]  T. Pilgram,et al.  Screening mammography in 350 women with breast implants: prevalence and findings of implant complications. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[50]  D B Kopans,et al.  Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. , 1995, Radiology.

[51]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: current status and future potential. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.